NOTE IMDb
5,9/10
1,6 k
MA NOTE
Ajouter une intrigue dans votre langueCharlie is an actor in a film studio. He messes up several scenes and is tossed out. Returning dressed as a lady, he charms the director. Even so, Charlie never makes it into film, winding u... Tout lireCharlie is an actor in a film studio. He messes up several scenes and is tossed out. Returning dressed as a lady, he charms the director. Even so, Charlie never makes it into film, winding up at the bottom of a well.Charlie is an actor in a film studio. He messes up several scenes and is tossed out. Returning dressed as a lady, he charms the director. Even so, Charlie never makes it into film, winding up at the bottom of a well.
- Réalisation
- Scénario
- Casting principal
Dan Albert
- Cameraman
- (non crédité)
Cecile Arnold
- Actress
- (non crédité)
Billie Bennett
- Actress
- (non crédité)
Helen Carruthers
- Actress
- (non crédité)
Glen Cavender
- Other Director
- (non crédité)
Charley Chase
- Actor
- (non crédité)
Dixie Chene
- Actress
- (non crédité)
Frank Dolan
- Boy
- (non crédité)
Vivian Edwards
- Actress
- (non crédité)
Billy Gilbert
- Cameraman
- (non crédité)
Grover Ligon
- Actor
- (non crédité)
Gene Marsh
- Actress
- (non crédité)
Avis à la une
This is an interesting little short comedy that, while rather uneven, is generally amusing. It's mostly remembered for Chaplin disguising himself as a woman, in an attempt to get into a movie studio. The idea of a man masquerading as a woman, or vice versa, was relatively common in the old silent comedies - this is one of the more believable efforts, as Charlie's disguise is credible enough to make that part of the movie work all right. But that's not necessarily the best or even the most interesting part of the film.
The setting in a movie studio is interesting in itself, offering a chance for some good-natured self-parody, and they got reasonable mileage out of the idea. Perhaps the best-crafted scene occurs very early on, when Chaplin and 'Fatty' Arbuckle have a battle of wits in the dressing room. It's no coincidence that it is the one scene in the picture in which Chaplin performs with another highly talented comedian, as the smooth timing and careful movement make it stand out from the more disjointed, frantic pace of most of the rest of the movie. But even as a whole, the movie works all right, despite its lack of refinement. It's hardly one of Chaplin's top efforts, but still entertaining and worth seeing.
The setting in a movie studio is interesting in itself, offering a chance for some good-natured self-parody, and they got reasonable mileage out of the idea. Perhaps the best-crafted scene occurs very early on, when Chaplin and 'Fatty' Arbuckle have a battle of wits in the dressing room. It's no coincidence that it is the one scene in the picture in which Chaplin performs with another highly talented comedian, as the smooth timing and careful movement make it stand out from the more disjointed, frantic pace of most of the rest of the movie. But even as a whole, the movie works all right, despite its lack of refinement. It's hardly one of Chaplin's top efforts, but still entertaining and worth seeing.
I am not really sure whether I liked this Charlie Chaplin short or not. Compared to his more famous shorts from 1915 to 1918 this is not that good but since it is Chaplin I found myself smiling almost constantly.
Here he plays an actor who messes up several takes. He is fired but returns dressed up as a woman. He kind of seduces the movie's director who likes the woman.
The problem with this short is that the only real joke here is Chaplin dressed up as a woman. Of course that is fun to see, but we don't see the real Chaplin and I guess that it makes this Chaplin short a little disappointing.
Here he plays an actor who messes up several takes. He is fired but returns dressed up as a woman. He kind of seduces the movie's director who likes the woman.
The problem with this short is that the only real joke here is Chaplin dressed up as a woman. Of course that is fun to see, but we don't see the real Chaplin and I guess that it makes this Chaplin short a little disappointing.
I've seen quite a few Chaplin shorts from early in his career and I've noticed that his early stuff (done for Keystone Studios) is pretty dreadful stuff. Unlike his wonderful full-length films from the 20s and 30s, the films from 1914-1915 are incredibly poorly made--having no script but only vague instructions from the director. In most cases, the films had almost no plot and degenerated to people punching and kicking each other.
This movie has a very thin plot. Charlie is either working at a movie set or he sneaks in--it's not sure which. And, he makes a mess of everything until he's thrown out,...only to return in drag! The director thinks Charlie's a hot tamale and begins making passes at him/her! Actually, I was shocked just how GOOD Chaplin looked as a girl! He probably could have passed as a woman in public.
FYI--this is the second film in which Chaplin appeared in drag. It also features Fatty Arbuckle in a cameo playing, I think, himself.
This movie has a very thin plot. Charlie is either working at a movie set or he sneaks in--it's not sure which. And, he makes a mess of everything until he's thrown out,...only to return in drag! The director thinks Charlie's a hot tamale and begins making passes at him/her! Actually, I was shocked just how GOOD Chaplin looked as a girl! He probably could have passed as a woman in public.
FYI--this is the second film in which Chaplin appeared in drag. It also features Fatty Arbuckle in a cameo playing, I think, himself.
A little hard to follow at times. Feels like Chaplin aimed too high in some scenes, which ends up looking too chaotic with the limitations of the movie industry a century ago.
Nonetheless a nice little show. A bit more polished than Laughing Gas and probably above the average Keystone production.
Nonetheless a nice little show. A bit more polished than Laughing Gas and probably above the average Keystone production.
'The Masquerader' is uneven and coarse. The humor is blunt, consisting mostly of kicks and fallings. Still, there are some clever moments - the scene in the dressing room with Roscoe 'Fatty' Arbuckle (who, in this case, outshines Chaplin). The plot might be a little bit difficult to follow, but here's my take - Charles Chaplin plays an actor (possibly himself) who gets hired in the movies. He dresses up as his most famous character, The Tramp. On the set, he misses his cues, flirts with women, and organizes some proper shenanigans which end in him getting fired and kicked out of the studio. The actor (Chaplin) returns, now dressed as a woman (a very beautiful woman). He (now she) attracts the attention of the director right away, and again, he starts another round of mischief.
The film is uneven and thinly plotted, but still, it is an interesting movie, mostly because it offers us a brief glance at the behind the scenes of that era's movie-making. Did I mention how convincingly feminine Chaplin looks in drag?
The film is uneven and thinly plotted, but still, it is an interesting movie, mostly because it offers us a brief glance at the behind the scenes of that era's movie-making. Did I mention how convincingly feminine Chaplin looks in drag?
Le saviez-vous
- AnecdotesThis film is among the 34 short films included in the "Chaplin at Keystone" DVD collection.
- ConnexionsEdited into Quand le rire était roi (1960)
Meilleurs choix
Connectez-vous pour évaluer et suivre la liste de favoris afin de recevoir des recommandations personnalisées
Détails
- Date de sortie
- Pays d’origine
- Site officiel
- Langues
- Aussi connu sous le nom de
- Charlot et l'Fone
- Société de production
- Voir plus de crédits d'entreprise sur IMDbPro
- Durée
- 13min
- Couleur
- Mixage
- Rapport de forme
- 1.33 : 1
Contribuer à cette page
Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant