Avis des utilisateurs

It's crazy to me to think that the last time a 'Final Destination' movie came out I was a young 20 year old man full of hopes and dreams. And the title of the fourth film in the series, 'The Final Destination', implied it would be the final instalment of the series back in 2009, however anyone familiar with modern Hollywood probably knew that was unlikely to remain the case - and it lasted 2 years.

When you make an instalment 14 years after the last, there's probably a sense that you have to do something a little different in order to justify it. And this film does mix the formula up - slightly. Just enough that it feels a little different, but not enough that it really alters the formula we have come to know and love.

The opening scene in this movie was really good. It was lengthy, fairly creative and had some great individual kills in the mix. From there thing go into a lull for a while, allowing the story to set itself up. Then the film goes bananas the rest of the way and we are treated to brilliant kill scene after brilliant kill scene. There are some really good ones in this film.

One thing that was a problem here - and something that has plagued the series in almost every film - is that it is riddled with unlikable characters. I can only think that's being done intentionally at this point to make people feel disposable and like no one is safe, but I can't help but feel the films would be slightly more impactful if the characters were a bit more likable overall.

All in all though I would say 'Final Destination: Bloodlines' was a lot better than it had any right to be 25 years after the original. 8/10.

Not bad at all. It makes the most logically-connected sense out of all the FD series. But... Realism? Way less now. Personally, it's still between "mid" to the "quite good" level. The FD series have always stood out in the category of horror. This movie still has some questionable scenes that leaves me with slight curiosity on how some of the occurences could be avoided, but it didn't disappoint me. The casting is wonderful and so is the acting. Plus, this one's highly supernatural and not as gory as the others in terms of screen time. A lot relies on the sound/music, and angles. I watched it in Premiere so I got the benefit of the sound system's work. The special effects and lighting quality made every scene look realistic in portrayal. What impressed me is that this is one of those moderate-comeback horror thrillers that's categorized as supernatural but isn't involving a visible entity or character. These kinds of movies stand out to me. And I'm overall impressed by the tense moments FD is able to exhibit. Also, this is my first review on IMDb!

Really enjoyed this one! It's super brutal again, but the story was told differently this time with the whole Bloodlines twist, which made it feel fresh and exciting. The plot was good and kept me entertained all the way through, with lots of intense moments, great pacing, and a few cool surprises along the way. I watched it in D-Box with Dolby Atmos - the sound was absolutely amazing, super powerful, and the moving seats made it even more intense and fun. Definitely a unique cinema experience. If you enjoy brutal action, great sound, and a fresh twist, you should totally check it out. Solid 7/10!

Final Destination: Bloodlines isn't going to pull a rabbit out of its undead hat, reinvent the horror wheel, or stake its claim as a genre-defining masterstroke-but that's not the point.

What it does do is breathe new life into a franchise that felt like it had run out of steam. Bloodlines is a solid sixth installment, packing the same patented "inevitable death" mechanics we know and (occasionally) love, but with enough fresh twists to keep die-hard fans from checking out.

If you never warmed to the idea of "death's design" calling the shots, this won't convert you. For everyone else, the film delivers brilliantly choreographed set pieces of grisly demise-think elaborate Rube Goldberg traps drenched in splatter FX-that hit the sweet spot between macabre creativity and good old-fashioned gore.

The biggest upgrade this time around is emotional buy-in: the victims aren't a bunch of arbitrary strangers thrown together by fate. Instead, Bloodlines builds sincere rapport with its core ensemble, giving each death a bit more narrative weight (and, yes, a smidge of pathos) before the inevitable payoff.

Unfortunately, the dialogue remains as thin as ever-flat exposition one moment, telenovela melodrama the next-reminding you that subtlety wasn't high on the call sheet.

On the plus side, the movie leavens the carnage with genuinely funny, ironically staged moments-many courtesy of Erik, whose over-the-top flair steals scenes from our so-called protagonist-and the delightfully absurd chain reactions (who knew the garbage truck could be such a menace?).

Even though the film trudges into its predictable finale with all the subtlety of a wrecking ball, Bloodlines is pure adrenaline: brutal, energetic, and darkly comedic. In other words, exactly what you paid for when you bought that Final Destination ticket.

Final Destination: Bloodlines is a great time. It does the smart thing and goes for a more comedic approach than earlier entries in the series.

Bloodlines contains possibly the best opening of the franchise and the first 20 minutes are a treat. The effects, while not amazing, do the job and are particularly gory even for this series.

The movie works well bringing a new twist on the Final Destination formula and the family are all likable enough in their own ways.

It would be remiss of me not to mention a standout in Richard Harmon. I spend a good portion of his time on screen trying to calculate if Tom Green could have fathered him as he is his dead ringer in this (amazingly both canadian as well). It was obvious they were going for a Tom Green type of character.

Tony Todd shows up for the last time as the mortician and it's a great emotional and poetic send off for him as well as giving his character an interesting backstory.

The movie has some nice little easter eggs for fans of the series with some call backs to previous entries as well as harking back to some of the premonitions.

The Final Destination franchise has always been interesting to me but never quite delivered a quality movie. This is perhaps the closest it has came to that by just being a good time and not getting bogged down in the lore.

Loved the movie.. and from what I noticed in the movie theatre and from my friends. Everyone enjoyed it! I personally enjoyed the overall story.. The opening scene in the tower is amazing really. Showed the story back in the old days and after many years in our time how death (a person) follows everyone.

I liked it.. Especially how the story carries on.. as a family curse plot. Some people find Final Destination movies repetitive.. true. I guess hardcore fans might expect/anticipate every single shot because it follows the same path as the old movies. But this one is very enjoyable.

Really keeps you at the edge of your seat. Most accidents were amusing to be honest. Especially the one in the MRI machine. Very creative.

If you are going into this movie just to have a good time and turn your brain off then you'll enjoy this film. However, as someone who became obsessed with the Final Destination franchise nearly 2 decades ago after watching the choose your own fate edition of Final Destination 3 with the tanning bed scene permanently seared into my brain, I'm a bit more harsh.

Cons:

• The CGI blood and kills. Nothing takes me out of a scene more than dark red cartoon blood. With a film that is built PRIMARILY on deaths it should be quite limited on the usage of CGI. We've seen great use of practical effects which is why this feels like such wasted potential. The biggest reason these movies work is because no matter how ridiculous the set up is the death still feels real (4th sequel excluded). It doesn't have the same effect if the person dying sudden looks like an animated character.

• This might be the most useless protagonist since the 4th installment. The main character might be the blandest character in the whole movie, and she has some tough competition because only 3 people stand out in this movie. I can forgive throw away characters if the deaths are memorable but both are lacking here.

• There have been rumors that there were reshoots and I believe them because the final act has some pacing issues and ends somewhat abruptly.

Pros:

• I will say that this film had the 2nd best opening scene/disaster behind the pile up.

• Tony Todd's goodbye was moving and possibly the best dialogue he has given in the franchise.

• The hospital death scene involving an MRI machine has a great build up of suspense and emotion and is up there with other iconic final destination death scenes.

• While there is more cons then pros for me I still had a good time and still fun to see in theaters. While some FD sequels miss the mark there is always another sequel that can surpass it. Can't wait for the next sequels!!

It's wild to say this, but after five movies and more than two decades, Final Destination somehow still has life left in it. Or rather, death. And this time, it hits a little closer to home. Bloodlines isn't just about unlucky strangers cheating fate anymore but it's about family. And with that shift, the stakes suddenly feel heavier, the emotions more raw. Because when death comes for the blood, it's not just fear you feel. It's grief. It's guilt. It's love. And maybe that's why this entry stands out, for better or worse.

Let's start with the concept. Family has never been the center of this franchise. We've seen classmates, co-workers, and acquaintances on the run from death, but this time, we're watching people who genuinely care for each other fall into that cycle. That makes a huge difference. It hurts more. It hits deeper. And yeah, it makes us wonder, if it were your family, how far would you go to stop the inevitable?

Also, credit where it's due. The film tries something new with the opening accident. No highways, no planes, no race tracks or suspension bridges. This time, it all kicks off in a high-rise restaurant. That shift alone already breathes new life into the formula. It's unexpected. It's acrophobic. It's oddly elegant and terrifying at the same time. But don't get too excited, if you were hoping for the long-awaited ship or water-related disaster (like many of us were), this ain't it.

Now, let's talk about the gore. We know why you're here. And yes, the deaths are brutal. Bloody. Wild. There were moments we flinched, moments we squirmed, moments we covered our eyes and peeked through our fingers. But as great as some of those sequences were, they don't quite reach the unforgettable horror of FD 2 or 3. Why? Because it uses too much CGI. The deaths feel animated and not in a good way. There's something about practical effects that stick with you, that disturb you long after the credits roll. Bloodlines often trades that realism for spectacle, and in doing so, it loses a bit of its bite.

The suspense is honestly a hit or miss. Part of what made Final Destination so scary was how simple the deaths were. The log truck that caused generational trauma, the tanning bed that was caused by dripping water, the escalator that was merely simple but very traumatizing, the lasik eye surgery that could happen basically to anyone. They made you fear your own bathroom. But here, some of the deaths feel too 'engineered'. Like fate had to go through a hundred different steps and a sprinkle of miracles just to make them happen. That makes it less scary, less grounded. It becomes a "movie death," not a "this could happen to me" death.

And that brings us to tone. This one's tricky. Bloodlines has this weird, goofy energy that feels like it wandered in from another genre. While we have cloudy sombre mood in Final Destination 2 or gothic rock look in Final Destination 3, this one felt goofy overall. It's still horror, yes, but it sometimes flirts a little too hard with comedy and not in the smart, dark humor way. Some of the jokes land, but a few feel way out of place. Like they belong in a Nickelodeon teen movie, not a franchise built on dread and doom. It felt comical and fantasy-like. You can definitely feel the directors' Disney Channel DNA in there especially in how some of the dialogue is written and delivered (Remember, they directed the live-action Kim Possible Movie fore real). A few lines honestly made us laugh, not because they were funny, but because they felt awkwardly placed or just plain corny.

But even with the tonal whiplash, the movie does do a few things really well. The balance between drama and horror is actually quite solid in some scenes. There are moments where you do care about the characters, their grief, their confusion, their desperation. There's one particular scene involving a sibling that really tugged at the heart. And those are the moments where Bloodlines reminds us what this franchise can be when it isn't trying to be too clever or too loud.

There are also some nice throwbacks for longtime fans but it's blink-and-you'll-miss-it easter eggs like a passing log truck, a familiar hospital name (Clear River, anyone?), and references to past characters or deaths. It's fan service, sure, but in a sweet, subtle way. Not overbearing. Just enough to make you smile but in fear.

Unfortunately, the pacing could've been tighter. The first half is a slow burn, and if you came in expecting death after death like Final Destination 2 or 4, you might be let down. This feels more like the first film. The story drives the engine, and the deaths are pit stops along the way. The final climax was mid. It doesn't really feel like that was supposed to be the climax of the movie. They could have explored more on how they could have impacted the story or the deaths more but what we got was a mid climax that felt boring and meh. It just doesn't build up to that edge-of-your-seat tension we were hoping for. It fizzles, rather than explodes.

We need to be honest about the visuals. Some of the camera work, lighting choices and delivery of dialogues just feel... off. Almost like you're watching an 18+ TV show rather than a polished horror film. At times it looks cheap, which is disappointing because this series deserves to feel cinematic. The horror deserves weight. Gravity. Darkness. Instead, it occasionally feels like a high-budget student film with B to C-list actors.

Still, despite all of that, we can't lie. We had fun. It gave us chills. It made us look over our shoulder. And more than anything, it reminded us that the Final Destination series still knows how to make death feel terrifyingly inevitable.

Verdict: After five films and a long break, Final Destination: Bloodlines doesn't just bring the franchise back - it rewires it. It's flawed, yes. The CGI bleeds into the kills too much. The goofy tone doesn't always match the stakes. But it hits deep. This isn't just about death anymore. It's about love, guilt, and what it means to lose someone you'd die for. Sure, some deaths feel too engineered, and yes, the tone sometimes slips into Nickelodeon-territory, but there's a real beating heart underneath the chaos. The CGI may cheapen the gore, but it still made us squirm, look away, and nervously laugh all in the same breath. It's not the scariest entry but it might be the most 'human'. And for a series known for senseless carnage, that's a wild achievement.

I have always loved Final Destination ever since the first one came out 25 years ago. This one nailed "the comeback". Super fun movie that stays true to the winning recipe from the previous movies.

I'm not gonna reveal anything, but it's final destination just as you remember them and want them to be.

I'm giving it a 10 star rating because it is a 10 star sequel that delivers what the fans want.

Of course it's not a 10-star oscar-worthy film experience, it isn't that kind of movie. But it is a 10-star movie for what kind of movie it is, and was ever supposed to be.

Highly recommend this movie both for fans of the series, and also for new viewers.

One of the best of the franchise in my opinion.

Humor, yes, dark humor, mixed with very nice CGI and well, not so predictable ending.

We made a game, watching and predicting/betting who's gonna die next and how.

Very entertaining.

Screenplay good, acting very decent.

Solid 7 in my opinion.

Was worth waiting.

Was worth watching.

The movie started with some promise but quickly lost momentum. The tower scene lacked fear or tension, and the height didn't feel scary at all due to poor cinematography. A similar scene in The Fall was shot with much more tension and thrill. Here, the CGI was weak, and the death scenes lacked clarity. The story felt rushed and shallow, with major missed opportunities. Character development was minimal, and the plot lacked emotional depth. That said, the humor worked well, especially Eric, played by Richard Harmon. His performance was genuinely entertaining and stood out in an otherwise forgettable film.

The film breathes fresh, terrifying life into the beloved horror franchise, delivering a masterclass in inventive, nail-biting suspense. Far from a tired rehash, this installment cleverly expands the lore with its "Bloodlines" concept, adding a compelling new layer to Death's relentless pursuit. The film excels at what the series does best: crafting elaborate, Rube Goldberg-esque death sequences that are both shockingly brutal and morbidly entertaining.

The directors demonstrate a keen understanding of tension, building unbearable anticipation before each gruesome payoff. The cast, while facing inevitable doom, delivers genuinely panicked and relatable performances, making their desperate struggle against fate all the more engaging. For fans craving creative kills and a thrilling ride, "Bloodlines" is a triumphant return to form that proves there's still plenty of life (and death) left in this iconic series.

Is it worth watching? Absolutely, especially for horror fans and those who love the franchise's signature inventive deaths.

After the first scene everything else about the movie is forgettable, characters are flat except that I can't remember his name at the moment because... Mr. Todd. Great performance. Those two things stood out in the movie. The way it started it was great but with each new scene after main character girl visits her family and then her grandmother after that it started to get, well cheap, like cheap thrills. It looked like average slasher movie. There weren't any smart ways they stopped someone from dying so that they die after they stopped it, there wasn't anything else later that would be special about the movie. There weren't any quotes, there was luck symbolism with coin and how it was used "to get them" and they lost the coin so "like a lucky coin" and old woman found it and lost it. There was some exploration of luck and fate then but as we could have seen, it was superficial. Also the ending was very dumb for me, yeah they couldn't cheat death and so but... I wish there was bit more depth to the story, bit more exploration of some themes like luck, life, death, fate. It's a missed opportunity, movie is good to pass time but time is expensive and we should "enjoy every second of our lives" as Todd said. Overall entertaining and okay.

It's great to see the Final Destination franchise return after all these years as it's always occupied a unique area in the horror movie genre... but Bloodlines does leave quite a lot wanting for me. In short, it has good new ideas (in its story-line, plot twists and deaths) but they could have been better "fleshed" out to make this more of a blockbuster and less of a straight to streaming services kind of experience.

My biggest complaint is I really wish there were more deaths! Usually each Final Destination's kill count goes way into the double digits. The original of course had over 200 from the opening sequence alone. This film needed more gore to keep it interesting for me and distract from the somewhat recycled plot lines and B-tier acting.

Respect how they didn't kill off Tony Todd's character to finish the trilogy,due to his real health issues therefore we must imagine it for closure.. With that said,hope they let Final Destination-Rest In Peace versus milking it.

Only way another Final Destination movie would be acceptable,if survivors returned & finally found a way to end things.. Closing what started a generational chain reaction,even before some were born. Etc.

Outside of the cameo with the legendary TT everything else,was basically been there seen that production.. Nothing felt overly original,not clichéd or perhaps with plotholes.

Not disregarding some of the opening scene positives but was like they used the whole budget on that,as the remaining movie felt lackluster.

Did anyone think the home Iris created felt more like,she was trying to keep out walkers versus death? All those spikes,etc. Logic failure!

Notice movies that claim to be horror try to fit in the all type of categories,to get most viewership regardless these days.. Where it can be on Shudder for example,but also under Disney.

I'm rather shocked with the high ratings,but also feel people(certain generations)don't appreciate quality movies anymore.

Acting to actors chosen was tolerable,cinematography & music was fine.. However you just didn't care about anyone,rooting for them or upset if they died.

Not part of the trilogy will probably rewatch,but was worth viewing once.

I don't know how they managed to pull this off, but somehow Final Destination: Bloodlines is the best Final Destination film of the lot!

What it does so well is to stand on its own as a fun experience, whilst also building on and adding to existing Final Destination mythology. It contains some nice nods and easter eggs to the previous films, and also weaves in Tony Todd's stalwart Final Destination character in a very satisfying way. However, none of this feels out of place to the point where newcomers will feel lost. Watching this film makes the previous Final Destination films better in my opinion due to the way it adds to the mythology.

Another great thing about this film is that it deviates from the standard Final Destination formula. Don't get it twisted, it is still largely the same thing, but the whole 'bloodlines' element does add something different. This makes it feel quite fresh, which is a big problem the franchise had after the second film in my opinion.

In terms of the performances and characters these are good. Certainly more fleshed out than the last couple of films. Kaitlyn Santa Juana is a strong lead as Stefani, and the rest of the characters are decently developed and interesting enough. Unlike some of the previous Final Destination films, I did find myself caring about the fate of these characters.

Then there is the main attraction of these films, the gory kills. You won't be disappointed watching this instalment as there are some top kills. The use of practical effects work was also very impressive in bringing them to life. They are all classic Final Destination kills, and will stick in your mind long after watching the film!

Overall this film was such a big surprise. It easily had potential to be a lazy cash grab, but they managed to make a thoroughly entertaining film that showed a lot of love and appreciation for the franchise. If you have enjoyed any of the previous Final Destination films or just have a penchant for gory horror, then you will definitely enjoy this!

This sixth franchise installment keeps the same core concept as the previous films but takes a fresh approach to the story. This time, the accidents aren't shown through the typical dynamics of the characters, but focus on tragedies from the past of the main character's grandmother. The film doesn't just involve friends and loved ones, but also family, making the narrative much darker and more morbid.

The deaths are far more creative, and while the accidents themselves aren't typical for a horror movie, they're events you could imagine happening in everyday life. Still, these occurrences are something we haven't seen in the series before, making the film all the more unpredictable.

It's been 14 years since the last installment, and I'm glad the creators decided to bring Final Destination back. I think they nailed the essence of the story, and the film is just as good as the previous ones, if not better than some. The effects are incredible, the CGI is top-notch, and we've been lacking a high-quality horror film like this, especially in the last few years.

I have to mention that the film disgusted and shocked me more than the previous ones, which means they nailed the effects. This film not only satisfies fans of the franchise but also brings something new and revitalizes the series.

I watched the double bill, the first movie and this back to back, both for the first time.

This films opener is fantastic, a genuinely 10/10 opener, it's shot amazingly, and the affects were amazing. However that was the peak of the movie and its never really able to reach those same highs. The first movies best feature was the tension created before a death, think Todd's death.

This movie mostly falls flat with this, instead trading mention for humour. Watching the first film with the exact same crowd, no one laughed at any deaths, it was serious and tense, bloodlines focused way too much on making the atmosphere light-hearted that it felt like a horror comedy on the level of cocaine bear.

What this film does do better is the gore, the deaths feel a lot more impactful visually, without going into details, a lot of them make you cringe out of sympathy. My last gripe is the scene in tattoo parlour shown on the bloodlines teaser trailer, it pretty much was only included so that they could put it in trailers and promotional material.

One of the problems with movie series like this is that makers can't handle the pressure of the hype and eventually let it down. BUT, they found something new and exciting with Bloodlines. The movie starts like a typical Final Destination, makes you think that it's going to be the same old stuff again but it eventually grows out to be a Well Written Storyline with a great screenplay that keeps us hooked to the scene even though we kind of expect what is going to happen. I mean that's the whole point of Final Destination itself right?- we know what's gonna happen and wait for the ways that's gonna happen and the WAYS are written and shot beautifully. Loved the experiments with cinematography. Humor worked out good at places.

A Good fun watch. Definitely recommended.

Watched> Friday, 9th May, 2025 @ The Backlot Cinema, Blackpool. Rated 3 * * * Good < Cert. 15 > HORROR. This was part of a double bill in Screen 7, first showing the 2000 Final Destination, which I hadn't seen, so this was just right for me to watch the one 25 years ago, before this latest version. The earlier one kept me on the edge of my seat throughout, with the build up of events unfolding in each of the horror scenes, and the big scene of all in the aircraft. The modern version did have it's own 'spectacular' scene in the extremely tall tower/restaurant building, which was shown in all the trailers. It was more spectacular than the aircraft scene. If the first one was bad enough putting you of flying, then this one was bad enough putting you of going in to a lift/elevator. The original does keep the horror serious at all times, but the new one did have the filmgoers laughing a number of times at the more slapstick style horror, which did put me off somewhat. I am sure a lot of reviewers will most likely disagree. (ps)

The return of the series after 14 years should not have been like this. It honestly felt like I was watching a gory Disney Channel Original Movie. The tone was way too childish. If it weren't for the gore, I'm sure it would have been rated PG-13 because the dialogue wasn't mature at all. I would have preferred a darker and more serious tone like in the first two movies.

One of the things that bothered me the most was the way they handled Bludworth. In the previous films, he was a mysterious character who seemed to have a supernatural connection to death. In Bloodlines, he's reduced to just an ordinary guy. I'm pretty sure this wasn't the original vision for the character. It felt like they rushed to close his arc because the actor is reportedly sick and may not return in future installments. The Bludworth we see in this film doesn't align with the enigmatic presence we knew. The man who used to deliver eerie, metaphorical warnings now feels completely humanized and bland.

The Final Destination series has never been fully consistent in its lore, but it's 2025. If you're bringing a franchise like this back, you need to be more coherent and deliberate. The final train crash should have been Stefani's premonition. All the other films start with something like a finger cut cut. Or maybe Charlie should have had the vision at the prom. The CGI in the final scene was awful. It looked like something out of Spy Kids.

On the bright side, I did appreciate the emotional approach of focusing on a family rather than a group of classmates or coworkers for once. It helped the audience connect more deeply with the characters. I really liked Iris and thought Brec Bassinger did a great job. The Skyview Tower collapse, while not visually perfect, ranks among my top three openings in the franchise.

The hospital sequence was by far the best part of the movie. The MRI death easily enters my top five deaths across all the films. I also liked how complex the death order was this time. The butterfly effect was depicted pretty well.

Overall, the movie was watchable but fell short of my expectations. A more serious and darker tone would have been a better fit. Honestly, if the whole film had taken place in the 1960s and followed Iris and the diner characters, it might have turned out better. But the most important thing is this franchise needs to be taken out of Zach and Adam's hands. They are turning it into a kids movie with gore.