Apparently it is not possible to write a lasting (negative) review of this film without moral guards approving it for deletion. How come? Because this is about the issue of a "deviant" sexual identity? Like with "The Danish Girl"? A film that I liked very much because it had cinematic and storytelling qualities and wasn't completely resting on a topic that was just hyped? I'll say it again: I don't care about people's sexuality as long as it is not overbearing or attacking or endangering other people. When I watch a film or a work of art about it, I first look at the topic neutrally. This film didn't manage to give me a feeling that made it cinematic. Inflationary dramaturgy, the already mentioned resting on a trendy topic, boring cinematography, mediocre to poor acting performances etc. Left me disappointed with this film. But hey, it seems hard to express an opinion like that, right? Because the current misunderstanders of morality, ethics and justice obviously cannot deal with opinions on works of art, because they believe that it is useful to play the arrogant and uninformed moral police on every bad product that affects one of their beloved trend topics. Unfortunately, democracy will probably not work with such people in the long term.
