[go: up one dir, main page]

    Calendrier de sortiesLes 250 meilleurs filmsLes films les plus populairesRechercher des films par genreMeilleur box officeHoraires et billetsActualités du cinémaPleins feux sur le cinéma indien
    Ce qui est diffusé à la télévision et en streamingLes 250 meilleures sériesÉmissions de télévision les plus populairesParcourir les séries TV par genreActualités télévisées
    Que regarderLes dernières bandes-annoncesProgrammes IMDb OriginalChoix d’IMDbCoup de projecteur sur IMDbGuide de divertissement pour la famillePodcasts IMDb
    OscarsEmmysSan Diego Comic-ConSummer Watch GuideToronto Int'l Film FestivalSTARmeter AwardsAwards CentralFestivalsTous les événements
    Né aujourd'huiLes célébrités les plus populairesActualités des célébrités
    Centre d'aideZone des contributeursSondages
Pour les professionnels de l'industrie
  • Langue
  • Entièrement prise en charge
  • English (United States)
    Partiellement prise en charge
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Liste de favoris
Se connecter
  • Entièrement prise en charge
  • English (United States)
    Partiellement prise en charge
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Utiliser l'appli
  • Distribution et équipe technique
  • Avis des utilisateurs
  • Anecdotes
  • FAQ
IMDbPro

L'Antre - Le Film le plus meurtrier jamais réalisé

Titre original : Antrum: The Deadliest Film Ever Made
  • 2018
  • 18
  • 1h 35min
NOTE IMDb
4,9/10
5,3 k
MA NOTE
Nicole Tompkins and Rowan Smyth in L'Antre - Le Film le plus meurtrier jamais réalisé (2018)
Regarder Official Trailer
Lire trailer1:40
1 Video
79 photos
HorreurFilm d'horreur de type « found footage »Horreur folklorique

Un garçon et une fille vont dans la forêt pour creuser un trou jusqu'en enfer. Réputé comme film maudit des années 1970, Antrum examine le pouvoir terrifiant de la narration.Un garçon et une fille vont dans la forêt pour creuser un trou jusqu'en enfer. Réputé comme film maudit des années 1970, Antrum examine le pouvoir terrifiant de la narration.Un garçon et une fille vont dans la forêt pour creuser un trou jusqu'en enfer. Réputé comme film maudit des années 1970, Antrum examine le pouvoir terrifiant de la narration.

  • Réalisation
    • David Amito
    • Michael Laicini
  • Scénario
    • David Amito
    • Michael Laicini
  • Casting principal
    • Nicole Tompkins
    • Rowan Smyth
    • Dan Istrate
  • Voir les informations de production sur IMDbPro
  • NOTE IMDb
    4,9/10
    5,3 k
    MA NOTE
    • Réalisation
      • David Amito
      • Michael Laicini
    • Scénario
      • David Amito
      • Michael Laicini
    • Casting principal
      • Nicole Tompkins
      • Rowan Smyth
      • Dan Istrate
    • 135avis d'utilisateurs
    • 39avis des critiques
  • Voir les informations de production sur IMDbPro
    • Récompenses
      • 3 nominations au total

    Vidéos1

    Official Trailer
    Trailer 1:40
    Official Trailer

    Photos79

    Voir l'affiche
    Voir l'affiche
    Voir l'affiche
    Voir l'affiche
    + 75
    Voir l'affiche

    Rôles principaux22

    Modifier
    Nicole Tompkins
    Nicole Tompkins
    • Oralee
    Rowan Smyth
    • Nathan
    Dan Istrate
    Dan Istrate
    • Cassius
    Circus-Szalewski
    Circus-Szalewski
    • Hanzie
    Shu Sakimoto
    Shu Sakimoto
    • Haruki
    Kristel Elling
    Kristel Elling
    • Amber
    Lucy Rayner
    Lucy Rayner
    • Narrator
    Pierluca Arancio
    Pierluca Arancio
    • Demon Amon
    A.J. Bond
    • Self
    Nathan Fleet
    Nathan Fleet
    • Self
    Brock Fricker
    • Self
    Brock Fricker
    • Self
    Assen Gadjalov
    • Self
    Ivan Gaston
    • Self
    Hank Nae
    • Self
    Douglas Olsson
    • Self
    Tabitha Tao
    Tabitha Tao
    • Self
    Joanna Timm
    • Self
    • Réalisation
      • David Amito
      • Michael Laicini
    • Scénario
      • David Amito
      • Michael Laicini
    • Toute la distribution et toute l’équipe technique
    • Production, box office et plus encore chez IMDbPro

    Avis des utilisateurs135

    4,95.3K
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10

    Avis à la une

    8nmn34

    Depends On What You Think a Movie Is

    Warning. This is a movie that's better watched without prior research.

    Antrum is a gimmick. It is a movie about a movie that plays the movie in its entirety, and that is going to make it a difficult pill for many people to swallow. But the premise is pretty solid. There exists this movie, it is pretty messed up, and everyone who watches it dies. Now, does it work?

    The movie is interesting in its commitment to the gimmick. It does feel like a movie from the 70s. There are a few tells that detract from it, but things like the choice of clothes, the jenky 70s audio, and grainy film quality does make it feel older. But more importantly, it makes some of the effects feel natural. Periodically, there are sigils that pop up that looked as though they were etched into the film by hand. Then comes the truly messed up parts. The movie sporadically just quits and cuts to some shocking footage. I didn't care for the torture scenes so much but there is one scene that I found truly disturbing. Without spoiling anything, its when the screen just spontaneously goes black where the movie gets genuinely so creepy it becomes hard to watch. There is no build to it but it is the most upsetting two minutes I've seen in any movie.

    Unfortunately, the plot of the movie is a bit slow and tedious. There are long shots of kids digging a hole. In fact, that's the premise of the movie. This isn't necessarily bad, it works with the gimmick, but if you can't bring yourself to buy into that gimmick, its going to hurt. A lot. No manner of horrible taxidermy squirrels or devil shaped brass bulls is going to save that. If you can get into it, the movie is pretty entertaining, like looking up cursed images online. Its just you putting more into it.

    I overall liked it. It was a fun experience if only for its cursed film gimmick. Not for everyone but ultimately something that should have been tried for yourself before reading a single review. So if you've gotten to this point, you've done goofed.
    7Reviews_of_the_Dead

    Interesting Take on the Cursed Film with a Touch of Found Footage

    This was a film that I heard about from one of the people that voted on what films to have at the Nightmares Film Festival. The little bit he told me, I made sure this was one that I would check out as it kind of sounds like similar to things like The Ring where there's a curse film. This was also the regional premiere for it, so that was kind of a cool aspect as well. The synopsis is a young boy and girl enters the forest to dig a hole to hell. Said to be a cursed film from the late 1970's, Antrum examines the horrifying power of storytelling.

    We actually start this off as a mockumentary of the history of this film. It is supposed to be coming out of Russia from what I could tell. This was screened in Romania and the theater burned down. There were also mysterious deaths when it was shopped around to show at film festivals. I really like how you get this uneasy feeling before it is actually shown. There's even a warning at the beginning stating that anyone who watches it, will die.

    The story itself is very basic. We have Nathan (Rowan Smyth) and his sister Oralee (Nicole Tompkins). They're family dog has to be put down and Nathan takes it quite hard. His mother isn't the nicest when he asks if the dog will go to heaven. He's shot down on this. His sister finds a book where she thinks that she can go to Hell to bring the dog's soul back. Near them, in the woods is antrum, or the door to hell. They have to dig a hole and go through the many layers in order to get to the level the dog's soul is at. Things aren't necessarily how they seem though and there are these weird men nearby who also seem to be Devil worshippers.

    The recap to this had to be a little bit shorter as there's actually not a lot to the story here. I actually don't mind this though, because a lot of what happens here is really in the visuals. I don't really want to spoil a reveal that happens late in the movie, because it actually makes a lot of sense to the truth of what is going on. A lot of this is actually based on perception though.

    There's really cool aspect to this film that if you're paying attention of you will see flashes of images in different places. What makes this even better is that at the very ending during the credits, it goes back to the documentary aspect to explain them. It actually makes sense why this is a cursed film and possible why the bad things happen. I'm not going to lie, I'm a sucker for this even though I know that it's not real.

    Something else I should point out is that this is from Canada, but they make it out to be like it is from Russia. They do a clever job at that making it seem why things are so off like they are. They also did a great job in filtering the images to make it look like it was filmed in the 70's. It is little attentions to details like that which make me appreciate the work that the filmmakers are doing. There's also not really a lot in the way of effects and what we get are more tricks of film and the look of things, which definitely adds to what they're going for.

    To shift to the pacing, the runtime comes in at 95 minutes. I think this actually works here, because the film within the film is probably just over an hour. The opening takes time to set the stage and try to build the fear of what happens to those that actually watch this. I'm not going to lie to you, I was a bit unnerved even though I knew nothing would happen. I do think that the lack of story does hurt just the slightest bit because I just feel it doesn't necessarily know where it was going. The ending was fine in my opinion and worked for what they were building toward.

    This would take me to the acting of this film, where I have to say overall they were fine. The historians and film experts I believed. They don't really come off as actors so that helps with the realism. The actors in the film are definitely amateurish feeling, which actually adds to creepiness of it for me. Like I said, they're not great, but there is something to what they're doing.

    Now with that said, this is an odd film that stuck with me a bit longer than it should have. It doesn't have a lot in the way of story, but I like the back-story they create for it. The pacing is good for the most part, but the lack of story does make it lose its way a bit in later in the story for me. There are some cool visuals and some really creepy parts for sure. The acting comes off very amateurish, but I actually think that works in the favor of the movie. The soundtrack doesn't necessarily stand out, but it does fit for what was needed and I do have to say, there's some really creepy ambient noise as well. Overall I'd have to say this is a slightly above average film. I liked it, but I think there's some missing parts to it really set it apart from similar type movies.
    7FFreviewer89

    Still alive

    Just watched this film and have still been alive for about 20 minutes now so I'm pretty pleased about that.
    5giagal

    It works, I died!

    Unfortunately the only deadly matter in this movie is boredom. The deadly boredom hits you very soon, then works it way, slowly, being helped by one of the silliest plots one can conceive, leading you either to sleep or to die. I died, it works...
    8quarkpusher

    Antrum is excellent and I will die on this hill.

    While clearly not appreciated by everyone, I found Antrum incredibly effective.

    I would start with the pitch-perfect performances of the two protagonists, played by Nicole Tompkins and Rowan Smyth. At times you forget you're watching a movie; you can tell the direction is very deliberate here as the script slithers along in an unorthodox and bizarre way, yet these two actors somehow manage to express exactly what you'd believe real people would at any given moment.

    Secondly, the film is disorienting and oppressive. This is accomplished, first of all, by invading a "safe space" from demons, Satan, hell, and the occult: a sunny, almost idyllic forest. Usually, dark forces creep around in gothic mansions or dark forests after midnight, around bonfires.

    Not so, here. Instead, the bad stuff happens mainly in broad daylight in an otherwise peaceful, appealing setting. The effect, therefore, is more unsettling because daylight and nice forests are supposed to be the respite between the periods of darkness where evil things rise and run amok in the shadows.

    There is no respite here.

    Further, the not-quite-subliminal frames inserted into the film really amplify matters, which brings me to the most important point:

    If the filmmakers would have asked me my opinion of this, I would have advised them to ditch the concept of a "cursed film" leaving the middle part - the Antrum story itself - to speak for itself. It feels like the filmmakers started out with this idea of a cursed film, perhaps with the film's plot as a secondary concern, but in reality the film itself holds up well and exceeds expectations.

    In particular, we're not 100% sure that what we're seeing is really happening, or whether the two characters have unwittingly created an egregore, in which a consensus hallucination of sort is occurring.

    Had the filmmakers had a much larger budget, they might have been tempted to use CGI to represent actual supernatural elements, but, in particular, the chains dragging across the forest floor were somehow more horrifying than a full-bore representation of what was supposed to be pulling at those chains.

    I might have even advised pulling back further to make this even more subtle. The real tension here is between what is real and what is imagined in the minds of the characters.

    The metal baphomet is reminiscent of the wicker man, which I appreciated, and the way the film doesn't feel the need to explain the presence of that or the forest Hungarians who treat it as some kind of totem, is greatly appreciated. Any attempt to tie this film together with a grand explanation would have been far less satisfying.

    Something is seriously wrong in this forest.

    Lastly, there is the soundtrack, which must be fully heard to be believed. As with the deft editing, I kept wondering how the filmmakers figured out how to combine all of these things the way they did to create a deeply unsettling experience.

    I am not sure why this is not rated higher. Viewed in the right state of mind, the film really breaks a lot of conventions.

    I like it a whole lot. What starts as a film about tunnelling to hell morphs into folk horror, as the landscape - the sunny forest - becomes a character unto itself.

    Vous aimerez aussi

    Butterfly Kisses
    5,9
    Butterfly Kisses
    Found Footage 3D
    5,3
    Found Footage 3D
    Savageland
    6,0
    Savageland
    The Poughkeepsie Tapes
    5,9
    The Poughkeepsie Tapes
    Death of a Vlogger
    5,6
    Death of a Vlogger
    Agartha's antrum
    Possum
    5,8
    Possum
    Hell House LLC III: Lake of Fire
    5,1
    Hell House LLC III: Lake of Fire
    The Surrender
    5,4
    The Surrender
    The Devil's Doorway
    5,3
    The Devil's Doorway
    Lake Mungo
    6,2
    Lake Mungo
    The Tunnel
    5,8
    The Tunnel

    Histoire

    Modifier

    Le saviez-vous

    Modifier
    • Anecdotes
      Blink and you miss it: There are several phrases in latin scattered all over the movie. These phrases are shown in at least one frame: 15:54 min 'Abyssus Abyssum Invocat' (Deep calleth unto deep). These words are part of the Psalms, chapter 42, verse 7, of the King James Version. 44:45 'Facilis Descensus Averno' (the downward path to death/Hell Is easy), from Virgil's Aeneid, Book VI, Line 126. 55:07 'Cave Hominem Unius Libri' (Beware the man of one single book). A variant of 'Homo Unius Libri', a phrase attributed to Thomas Aquinas. 1:10:02 'Nihil Pretiosius Veritate' (Nothing is more beautiful than the truth), attributed to Francisco Sánchez de las Brozas, from his opus 'Minerva sive de causis linguae latinae', Book I, Chapter 1.
    • Gaffes
      The chest of the sculpture used as an oven is decorated with two metal disks, they are bicycle brakes, introduced only at the end of the 90s.
    • Citations

      Title Card: LEGAL NOTICE: By continuing to watch this film, you agree that the producers of this film have made you aware of the history and dangers associated with Antrum. The producers, distributors, cast, crew, unions, and theater management on all levels, are released of all liability for any event that occurs to you during or after your screening, including but not limited to illness, injury, mortal danger, or death. If you disagree in any way with this notice, you must leave the theater now.

    • Crédits fous
      A second set of credits is shown 10 minutes in for the deadly film, after the documentary-style introduction. The cast and crew names are mostly written in Cyrillic letters, with a few exceptions, which use the Latin alphabet.
    • Connexions
      Featured in FoundFlix: Antrum (2019) Explained (2020)

    Meilleurs choix

    Connectez-vous pour évaluer et suivre la liste de favoris afin de recevoir des recommandations personnalisées
    Se connecter

    FAQ15

    • How long is Antrum: The Deadliest Film Ever Made?Alimenté par Alexa

    Détails

    Modifier
    • Date de sortie
      • 12 novembre 2018 (France)
    • Pays d’origine
      • Canada
    • Sites officiels
      • Official site
      • Official site (Japan)
    • Langues
      • Anglais
      • Hongrois
      • Japonais
    • Aussi connu sous le nom de
      • Antrum
    • Société de production
      • Else Films
    • Voir plus de crédits d'entreprise sur IMDbPro

    Box-office

    Modifier
    • Montant brut mondial
      • 26 $US
    Voir les infos détaillées du box-office sur IMDbPro

    Spécifications techniques

    Modifier
    • Durée
      • 1h 35min(95 min)
    • Couleur
      • Color
    • Rapport de forme
      • 1.78 : 1

    Contribuer à cette page

    Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant
    • En savoir plus sur la contribution
    Modifier la page

    Découvrir

    Récemment consultés

    Activez les cookies du navigateur pour utiliser cette fonctionnalité. En savoir plus
    Obtenir l'application IMDb
    Identifiez-vous pour accéder à davantage de ressourcesIdentifiez-vous pour accéder à davantage de ressources
    Suivez IMDb sur les réseaux sociaux
    Obtenir l'application IMDb
    Pour Android et iOS
    Obtenir l'application IMDb
    • Aide
    • Index du site
    • IMDbPro
    • Box Office Mojo
    • Licence de données IMDb
    • Salle de presse
    • Annonces
    • Emplois
    • Conditions d'utilisation
    • Politique de confidentialité
    • Your Ads Privacy Choices
    IMDb, une société Amazon

    © 1990-2025 by IMDb.com, Inc.