[go: up one dir, main page]

    Calendrier de parutionsTop 250 des filmsFilms les plus regardésRechercher des films par genreSommet du box-officeHoraires et ticketsActualités du cinémaFilms indiens en vedette
    À la télé et en streamingTop 250 des sériesSéries les plus populairesParcourir les séries TV par genreActualités TV
    Que regarderDernières bandes-annoncesProgrammes IMDb OriginalChoix d’IMDbCoup de projecteur sur IMDbFamily Entertainment GuidePodcasts IMDb
    OscarsPride MonthAmerican Black Film FestivalSummer Watch GuideSTARmeter AwardsAwards CentralFestivalsTous les événements
    Nés aujourd’huiCélébrités les plus populairesActualités des célébrités
    Centre d’aideZone des contributeursSondages
Pour les professionnels du secteur
  • Langue
  • Entièrement prise en charge
  • English (United States)
    Partiellement prise en charge
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Liste de favoris
Se connecter
  • Entièrement prise en charge
  • English (United States)
    Partiellement prise en charge
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Utiliser l'appli
  • Distribution et équipe technique
  • Avis des utilisateurs
  • Anecdotes
  • FAQ
IMDbPro

Arctic Void

  • 2022
  • 1h 25min
NOTE IMDb
4,6/10
3,4 k
MA NOTE
Tim Griffin and Michael Weaver in Arctic Void (2022)
Regarder Arctic Void Official Trailer
Lire trailer2:01
1 Video
7 photos
Conspiracy ThrillerDramaHorrorMysterySci-FiThriller

Lorsque l'électricité tombe mystérieusement en panne et que presque tout le monde disparaît d'un petit bateau de tourisme dans l'Arctique, la peur devient le maître pour les trois qui resten... Tout lireLorsque l'électricité tombe mystérieusement en panne et que presque tout le monde disparaît d'un petit bateau de tourisme dans l'Arctique, la peur devient le maître pour les trois qui restent.Lorsque l'électricité tombe mystérieusement en panne et que presque tout le monde disparaît d'un petit bateau de tourisme dans l'Arctique, la peur devient le maître pour les trois qui restent.

  • Réalisation
    • Darren Mann
  • Scénario
    • Darren Mann
    • Jay Kirk
    • William Paul Jones
  • Casting principal
    • Michael Weaver
    • Tim Griffin
    • Justin Huen
  • Voir les informations de production sur IMDbPro
  • NOTE IMDb
    4,6/10
    3,4 k
    MA NOTE
    • Réalisation
      • Darren Mann
    • Scénario
      • Darren Mann
      • Jay Kirk
      • William Paul Jones
    • Casting principal
      • Michael Weaver
      • Tim Griffin
      • Justin Huen
    • 139avis d'utilisateurs
    • 12avis des critiques
  • Voir les informations de production sur IMDbPro
  • Vidéos1

    Arctic Void Official Trailer
    Trailer 2:01
    Arctic Void Official Trailer

    Photos6

    Voir l'affiche
    Voir l'affiche
    Voir l'affiche
    Voir l'affiche
    Voir l'affiche
    + 2
    Voir l'affiche

    Rôles principaux16

    Modifier
    Michael Weaver
    Michael Weaver
    • Ray Marsh
    Tim Griffin
    Tim Griffin
    • Alan Meursault
    Justin Huen
    Justin Huen
    • Sean Tibbets
    Rune Temte
    Rune Temte
    • Jim
    Sarah Alles
    Sarah Alles
    • Freida
    Laura Sophia Becker
    • Elsie
    Ingrid Liavaag
    • Marlene
    Thea Sofie Loch Næss
    Thea Sofie Loch Næss
    • Lucy
    Thomas Gallagher
    • Anders
    Jim Johansen
    • Taxi Driver
    James Dunlop
    • Marius
    Andreas Eriksson
    • Boat Passenger
    Hege Giske
    • Boat Passenger
    Ingrid Liavaag
    • Marlene
    Vanessa Pitusi
    • Boat Passenger
    Joel Vikberg Wernstrom
    • Boat Passenger
    • Réalisation
      • Darren Mann
    • Scénario
      • Darren Mann
      • Jay Kirk
      • William Paul Jones
    • Toute la distribution et toute l’équipe technique
    • Production, box office et plus encore chez IMDbPro

    Avis des utilisateurs139

    4,63.4K
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10

    Avis à la une

    7zamboni-36633

    Was great until it wasn't

    At the end of this movie it says This film was shot in 16 days by 16 people. That's pretty amazing considering it had an interesting plot, a very unique location for filming and the acting was just fine. The camera didn't bounce all over the place and the movie wasn't shot in the dark so you couldn't see what was going on. I enjoyed this movie quite a bit and cared about the characters. Then, the ending. Or lack thereof. I don't know who thought up the ridiculous ending, but someone, anyone should have laughed and said, "No, really. How are we ending this story?"
    smoke0

    It was OK

    I don't get all the hate for this, somebody doesn't like somebody personally or professionally and I couldn't care less about their feelings.

    I would not bother to review a film like this ordinarily because it was neither great or horrible, just a movie that kept me interested enough to watch to the end, but due to all the hate I just felt I needed to add a more positive review.
    6curtd-49392

    Contrary to others here expecting something else, I enjoyed it.

    A movie should fulfill it's promise. The script, acting, direction, lighting, and photography are better than most foreign films, and even the sound holds together. Americans (myself included) prefer more closure than the ending provides. And I'm still unsure whether or not I understand the ending. But the truth is that for a Saturday afternoon on a cold winter day, it was beautiful to look at, held attention, better crafted, and far, far, better edited than much higher budget productions. The credits state that it was filmed with 16 people in 16 days and there are some interesting names in the 'Special Thanks' credits that are encouraging, and might explain that success. So IMO the movie fulfills its promise even if the crew didn't carry the story to a comforting end.
    5leesimon-26357

    Not terrible, just quite disappointing.

    Two men who produce a nature TV series hire a cameraman and head to a remote Norwegian village to shoot an episode. While on a passenger vessel with a colorful cast of bystanders and crew, an unknown event causes all but the 2 friends and their cameraman to go missing without a trace. What happened and what will happen to our protagonists?

    The premise of the movie is quite good, however the script is lacking in plot movement and development. The dialogue is also quite bad. The most disappointing thing was the low effort put towards writing good reasons for plot points to occur. This kind of movie also really shows how difficult it must be to write believable and natural-sounding dialogue, because these people do not speak to each other like normal humans would speak to each other. Events happen because they have to happen, not because any character has a realistic reason to make something happen. The amount of time spent "walking around looking befuddlingly puzzled" is WAY too long. They truly did not have to spend so much movie time watching each of the 3 characters walk around not knowing what is going on.

    Having said that, none of the shortcomings take this movie down to a 1 or 2 star level. It looks absolutely gorgeous, and every shot adds to the general atmosphere of the serene setting. The basic idea is also pretty good. Without spoiling anything about the ending, it's not quite fair to say that "nothing happens" or that the ending is a non-ending. I would have preferred if less time was spent during the "we don't know what's going on" phase of the story, and the movie spent maybe 20 minutes at the end exploring what they are introducing as the explanation for the event. Again, no spoilers, but while I think they were going for a purposeful cliffhanger ending, I think it comes across more like a "lazy, no time to write plausible, real answers" type of ending.

    I won't watch it again because it was too boring throughout without enough of a satisfying ending for the viewer. However, I wouldn't stop a friend from watching it if it came on TV.
    7Top_Dawg_Critic

    Such a wasted opportunity.

    Three writers and not one could come up with an actual ending? What's worse, is that this film could've so easily been epic. It had excellent directing, amazing cinematography, beautiful landscapes and settings, spot on score, and the cast and performances were great. For a low budget indie film, this can school even some experienced filmmakers on how to create the perfect suspense and environment for its genre. Even the writing was great until about the final act. There were no plot holes or technical issues, then the ending just got sloppy and boring. Seeing the little special effects with the animals brings the tension and suspense level right up, and you know it's building up to something huge, and then, boom!, a total let down. Budget can't be the excuse, because imagination is free. It's seems more like the writers got bored and/or lazy. Such an easy fix and what a shame. Sadly, it's only a 7/10 from me, all going to the first three-quarters of what was almost a perfect film, and it could've easily been more, if there was a little more effort.

    Vous aimerez aussi

    Island Zero
    4,7
    Island Zero
    3022
    4,5
    3022
    The Tank
    4,6
    The Tank
    Radius
    6,2
    Radius
    The Forest
    4,6
    The Forest
    Sentinelle
    4,9
    Sentinelle
    Les ombres du désert
    5,3
    Les ombres du désert
    Natt til 17.
    5,5
    Natt til 17.
    Motherly
    5,2
    Motherly
    The Thaw
    5,2
    The Thaw
    Risen
    3,6
    Risen
    La Dernière Femme sur terre
    4,7
    La Dernière Femme sur terre

    Histoire

    Modifier

    Le saviez-vous

    Modifier
    • Anecdotes
      The film was shot in 16 days by 16 people on location in Svalbard Norway.
    • Gaffes
      Satellite phones, in this case Iridium, do not work inside buildings (unless they have an external antenna linking to the outside).
    • Citations

      Alan Meursault: Are you my friend? I'm your friend. And friends don't eat friends.

    • Crédits fous
      A shot of the floating camera bag appears after the credits.

    Meilleurs choix

    Connectez-vous pour évaluer et suivre la liste de favoris afin de recevoir des recommandations personnalisées
    Se connecter

    FAQ13

    • How long is Arctic Void?Alimenté par Alexa

    Détails

    Modifier
    • Date de sortie
      • 18 février 2023 (Pologne)
    • Pays d’origine
      • États-Unis
    • Site officiel
      • look book
    • Langues
      • Anglais
      • Norvégien
      • Allemand
    • Aussi connu sous le nom de
      • Dissonance
    • Lieux de tournage
      • Pyramiden, Svalbard, Norvège(Russia)
    • Sociétés de production
      • Mann-made Pictures
      • Two Doors Down
    • Voir plus de crédits d'entreprise sur IMDbPro

    Spécifications techniques

    Modifier
    • Durée
      1 heure 25 minutes
    • Couleur
      • Color
    • Rapport de forme
      • 2.35 : 1

    Contribuer à cette page

    Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant
    Tim Griffin and Michael Weaver in Arctic Void (2022)
    Lacune principale
    By what name was Arctic Void (2022) officially released in India in English?
    Répondre
    • Voir plus de lacunes
    • En savoir plus sur la contribution
    Modifier la page

    Découvrir

    Récemment consultés

    Activez les cookies du navigateur pour utiliser cette fonctionnalité. En savoir plus
    Obtenir l'application IMDb
    Identifiez-vous pour accéder à davantage de ressourcesIdentifiez-vous pour accéder à davantage de ressources
    Suivez IMDb sur les réseaux sociaux
    Obtenir l'application IMDb
    Pour Android et iOS
    Obtenir l'application IMDb
    • Aide
    • Index du site
    • IMDbPro
    • Box Office Mojo
    • Licence de données IMDb
    • Salle de presse
    • Annonces
    • Emplois
    • Conditions d'utilisation
    • Politique de confidentialité
    • Your Ads Privacy Choices
    IMDb, une société Amazon

    © 1990-2025 by IMDb.com, Inc.