NOTE IMDb
5,6/10
8,1 k
MA NOTE
Une femme d'une trentaine d'années qui alterne entre amour et chagrin d'amour au cours d'une année. Au cours de cette période, elle va percer les secrets de sa vie qui changera du tout au to... Tout lireUne femme d'une trentaine d'années qui alterne entre amour et chagrin d'amour au cours d'une année. Au cours de cette période, elle va percer les secrets de sa vie qui changera du tout au tout dans les lieux les plus surprenants.Une femme d'une trentaine d'années qui alterne entre amour et chagrin d'amour au cours d'une année. Au cours de cette période, elle va percer les secrets de sa vie qui changera du tout au tout dans les lieux les plus surprenants.
- Réalisation
- Scénario
- Casting principal
Jonathan R. Freeman
- Graham
- (as Jonathan Brooks)
Avis à la une
If you are looking for an intellectual movie, skip this one. This is a movie about a 'lost' girl 'finding' herself. She has two incredibly attractive men to choose from and on goes the story. This movie is very reminiscent of wattpad fanfictions I used to read as a teen. I honestly saw this movie for Sebastian Stan and his performance was good. Woodley, as ever, has the emotional range of a cucumber. The soundtrack of the movie, however, is good. If you are bored and looking for a predictable romance movie that does not require a lot of thinking, this is for you.
"Endings, Beginnings" is a spare story of a woman, Daphne, who appears to have no career or job, and seems adrift in her personal life after a break-up. She does a lot of party- and club-hopping in LA, and meets two hot dudes who happen to be close friends. This triangle gets messy when she falls into a sexual relationship with both of them. One is the classic bad boy who owes people money, smokes pot, but is great in bed. The other is a more serious academic and writer who offers the prospect of a deeper relationship, but she seems to find him less "exciting." Even though he's very cool and good-looking!
The shaky camera work, abrupt cuts, dreamy lighting and lack of dialogue or structured plot make this seem like a music video more than a feature film. Stan and Woodley have some raunchy sex scenes, and you can see why she finds him irresistible, but this is fairly shallow fare due to the direction and writing.
The shaky camera work, abrupt cuts, dreamy lighting and lack of dialogue or structured plot make this seem like a music video more than a feature film. Stan and Woodley have some raunchy sex scenes, and you can see why she finds him irresistible, but this is fairly shallow fare due to the direction and writing.
This movie terribly lacked substance and excitement. Nothing happens except kitschy texts on the screen every five minutes and the next thing you know, Daphne slinks out of one guy's arms and runs into the other's, only to turn back to the first one again in a jiffy. I'd expect a movie with Jamie Dornan to have a lot more verve and zest, to be honest. What a shame.
I have to admit that the original title is way more apt - but then again Love again also makes sense. This is a movie about love and relationships .. and a different type of femme fatale. If she can be called that. Maybe a subtle Siren? And one that only seems to sway a certain type of man.
Of course those men being portrayed by two very well known actors (one from the Marvel Cinematic Universe, the other from the 50 shades movies) makes it easier for a certain target audience to get involved in this. Having Woodley in this of course will also appease another target group. And the movie being quite raunchy helps too (nudity and a lot of heated .. connections included) ... if you are not easily offended that is of course.
A different and akward look at sex life and expectations ... especially for those undecided ones ... why choose one, when you can have both? Or how certain are you that one is better than the other? Feelings can never be left unaccounted for ...
Of course those men being portrayed by two very well known actors (one from the Marvel Cinematic Universe, the other from the 50 shades movies) makes it easier for a certain target audience to get involved in this. Having Woodley in this of course will also appease another target group. And the movie being quite raunchy helps too (nudity and a lot of heated .. connections included) ... if you are not easily offended that is of course.
A different and akward look at sex life and expectations ... especially for those undecided ones ... why choose one, when you can have both? Or how certain are you that one is better than the other? Feelings can never be left unaccounted for ...
Le saviez-vous
- AnecdotesThe MPAA initially gave the film an NC-17 rating due to its realistic depiction of sexuality. The director made several edits but each of them got the same rating. Finally, the movie was released unrated in the U.S.
Meilleurs choix
Connectez-vous pour évaluer et suivre la liste de favoris afin de recevoir des recommandations personnalisées
- How long is Endings, Beginnings?Alimenté par Alexa
Détails
Box-office
- Montant brut mondial
- 239 231 $US
- Durée
- 1h 50min(110 min)
- Couleur
- Rapport de forme
- 2.35 : 1
Contribuer à cette page
Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant