Dernier amour

A vision let's say very personal and original of Casanova: weakly charismatic, almost inexpressive, idle, depressed and even suicidal, ... I guess the film evokes a namesake, because even Jean-Claude Dus within Les bronzés font du ski (1979) is definitely more seductive. Except this pathetic and inappropriate non-sense, the costumes and sets are top.

I never fell in love with Casanova, quite the opposite, his films are always boring, misogynistic, disgusting and disgusting, and this one is no different, with the difference that the protagonist rejects him, perhaps that's why, of all of them, this was the least unpleasant, despite the fact that the toxic and scumbag macho attitude remains in him, and in all the others that appear in the film, which makes it longer and more tiring... Some men definitely have difficulty accepting a woman's NO...

In the 18th century, Casanova, known for his practices of pleasure and seduction, arrives in London after being forced into exile. In this city that he barely knows, he meets a young courtesan, Charpillon, several times, who enchants him to the point of making him forget about other women. Casanova is willing to do anything to win her over, but Charpillon always avoids him, using the most diverse pretexts. She proposes a challenge to him: that he loves her as much as he desires her.

No, I´m not an expert on Casanova. Therefore I did some research after watching this movie. One episode stood out from his life if you ask me. He had a child with his own daughter. I thought that Casanova only had affairs outside his family. I don´t understand or approve of that decision.

But all in all I guess that Casanova, above all, was most famous for his love affairs with many different women. And most love affairs have a great amount of romance, passion, seduction and flirtiness. But "Dernier amour"/"Casanova, Last Love" has too little of those feelings in my opinion. I understand that older people usually don´t have the same energy as younger people. But love affairs can contain many different things, not just bedroom stuff.

I didn´t regret watching this movie. It has beautiful costumes and some tender moments. But I don´t know if I would want to watch this movie again.

Casanova, "the most powerful man in the world," the adorable phallus, in his mid-years, infatuated with a young woman half his age who doesn't give him enough attention. Isn't this the classical tragedy during all human existence, say from the Bible's King David to the numbers of fifty-year-old divorces nowadays? The sexual power young women have, even the ugliest or less talented one, drives crazy so many men and makes them put in risk their reputation, money, even their own life. Casanova here insists it is more than mere infatuation, and he is correct, his situation is far more complicated than that. What is the truth of his desire then? Is it about some power this particular woman intrinsically has? The movie rightly shows her ambiguously; she is attractive, yes, but also vulgar and manipulative. Therefore, is it something unsatisfying that he sees in himself? Maybe yes. Casanova is a libertine who has built a reputation as a womanizer; he has money, social influences, ex-lovers are fond of him. However, we see him here precisely on the verge of self-humiliation and degradation, risking losing everything just for the sake of receiving care and attention from a love that is impossible only for him. Casanova, "the most powerful man in the world," is the only one who cannot have this woman. This puzzle may be the punishment he unconsciously inflicts on himself, following the legend of Don Giovanni, the quest for moral redemption through self-inflicted spiritual and sexual pain. This movie is a masterpiece, for it shows the moment of realization that all human beings have, at some point, seeing the finitude of their lives. The film is also profoundly humanistic. It shows how and why power relations are complicated and bi-directional, far from what the current MeToo wave of childish self-victimization has popularized in the Anglo-American culture. Script and direction are precise and dynamic here, and the photography is evocative and technically perfect. Actors Lindon and Martin deliver enjoyable parts; they succeed at making this power game vivid and tragic.