NOTE IMDb
4,7/10
3,7 k
MA NOTE
À travers des reconstitutions glaçantes, des gens ordinaires partagent avec leurs proches les histoires terrifiantes qui les hantent.À travers des reconstitutions glaçantes, des gens ordinaires partagent avec leurs proches les histoires terrifiantes qui les hantent.À travers des reconstitutions glaçantes, des gens ordinaires partagent avec leurs proches les histoires terrifiantes qui les hantent.
Parcourir les épisodes
Avis à la une
Beggining with episode 1 i was intrigued, but my questions kept piling up.. then when it came to episode 2 i stopped watching. Netflix needs to understand they have to give more information to these accounts. it's one person telling their story, poorly. there are no names, facts or evidence period. I'm really aggravated with Netflix's sloppiness on this show because it had potential to be very interesting. After watching the second episode, you will have one million questions & zero answers leaving you completely unsatisfied.. Would absolutely not recommend to anyone.
As the title suggests, this is a show about people with untreated PTSD...
All of them have experienced something traumatic at a young age, and now they see ghosts.
Really, instead of exploiting them on TV, these people should be offered councelling, or some other forms of help.
Really, instead of exploiting them on TV, these people should be offered councelling, or some other forms of help.
Not sure why so many bad reviews. I compare it to a camp site stories. The re-enactments , video production looks good. Sounds good if you have surrounded sound. I live in the Dallas area and recognized the people in the born cursed episode, I know there not actors but are very successful family. I would say out of the 2 season there's probably 2 episodes i can do without, other than that they were very interesting and good.
What made this series so poor was that it is advertised as supposedly true stories based on interviews from the victims. Perhaps the "true story" aspect was intended to make it seem scarier, but in reality, it was a distraction. First of all, as other reviewers are saying, there was no evidence to back up any of these accounts. Second, the stories were so over the top that it was highly unlikely they were true. If they would have left out the true aspect, cut out the interviews, and just made this a scary anthology series of ghost stories, it could be pretty good.
First of all, You can't look at this from a "where are the facts" kind of way. It doesn't claim to be an investigative series. It's like telling ghost stores around a campfire. It says based on a true story bc the people telling it believe it to be true. Nothing about this show is actually factually based and I believe that to be the point. It's cool cinematography and is a bit scary/troubling. The slaughterhouse episode is outlandish, but it's meant to be taken at face value. Its not a damn documentary, like these people making the other comments are expecting it to be.
Le saviez-vous
- ConnexionsFeatured in WatchMojo: Top 10 Worst Horror TV Shows (2019)
Meilleurs choix
Connectez-vous pour évaluer et suivre la liste de favoris afin de recevoir des recommandations personnalisées
- How many seasons does Haunted have?Alimenté par Alexa
Détails
Contribuer à cette page
Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant