Silent Zone

If you like zombie movies, you will like this movie. It is well above average for this genre.

The country of origin is given as Hungary, but some of this movie definitely looked like the Chernobyl restricted zone. Either way, the locations were good, the big wide angle shots were well done, the camera work was excellent. This does not look like a cheap, low budget movie.

There was character development, not a lot, but enough to keep you interested. The acting was for the most part good, especially the leading characters. Some of the secondary parts, with only a few lines, did come off as amateurish, but mostly quite professional.

It's not great or outstanding, and I will probably never watch it again, but I felt it was well worth my time on a lazy afternoon.

Overall: Above average zombie movie, recommended.

Everything that needs to be in a film of this genre is present in Silent Zone: a simple plot, intense action, hordes of the undead, and a mad scientist.

However: The acting is bad, the dialogue is dull, and the fight scenes are so poorly executed that I actually laughed out loud at times. The director clearly didn't have an armorer on set. The way the actors handle firearms is comical, and the amount of muzzle flash is ridiculously unrealistic. The tension of traveling through the remnants of civilization is nonexistent. The characters don't fit together, they are underdeveloped, and they left no impression on me.

To sum up: The framework of this film could serve as a starting point for writing a script for any movie in this genre. Silent Zone is a failure only because it didn't have enough funding.

While I had indeed never heard about this 2025 zombie movie titled "Silent Zone", then given my love of all things zombie, of course I had to check it out, without the shadow of a doubt.

Writers Viktor Csák and Krisztián Illés put together a fair enough script. Sure, for a zombie movie, then it was somewhat generic. But it still proved entertaining nonetheless, so the movie did what it was supposed to do.

There wasn't a single familiar actor or actress on the cast list, which is actually something I do enjoy whenever I watch a movie. The acting performances in the movie were fair.

The snarling sounds that the infected, or zombies, made was just downright stupid. It just added a very unnecessary comedy element to the infected, and thus taking away from what was supposed to be scary.

Something that definitely was interesting in "Silent Zone" was that writers Viktor Csák and Krisztián Illés actually put in a small boy turning into an infected. That is usually something zombie movies tend to stay well clear of, so that was a nice touch.

However, the zombie make-up and effects left much to be desired. This was ultimately a low budget zombie movie and it showed. I wasn't particularly impressed with the effects in the movie. I've seen worse low budget zombie effects, of course, but the effects in "Silent Zone" were nothing to write home about.

Some of the music in the movie borrowed a bit too heavily from the iconic "28 Days Later" theme.

"Silent Zone", despite of having a title that made zero sense to the contents of the movie, was a watchable zombie movie, but nothing out of the ordinary. There are far better zombie movies out there.

My rating of director Peter Deak's 2025 zombie movie "Silent Zone" lands on a five out of ten stars.

I can't even believe that I paid $5 for this movie. The fights are terrible, the "bleeding" is even worse, and the acting is really bad!! The make-up is really bad too...one part in the beginning was a woman who got bit on the face and it looked like she dipped her face in dirt or rocks. The availability of vehicles for the all too hurried escape time after time was really really bad. I get it that everyone wants to make the perfect zombie movie but it's ridiculous that the "hero" is some guy who blames and blames everyone else because something didn't go to plan as he would of liked. I love zombie movies but this one isn't good at all.

I finally caught Silent Zone, and while it's not the kind of film that's going to redefine the post-apocalyptic horror genre, it does enough right to keep you watching. It's one of those movies that doesn't try to be flashy or groundbreaking but instead leans into the tension and grit of survival-and for the most part, it works.

The setup is pretty straightforward. Years after a brutal outbreak has wiped out most of civilization, survivors Cassius and Abigail have learned how to stay alive by keeping their heads down and trusting no one. Their fragile routine gets thrown off when they encounter a pregnant woman. It's a moral dilemma that forces them to risk their own safety to find her a place of refuge. From that point, it becomes a tense road movie, where the threats come not just from the infected but from other desperate survivors.

What the film does well is build tension. You're never quite sure when something terrible is going to happen, and it creates this constant sense of unease. The infected are genuinely creepy, and the encounters with other survivors-who are often just as dangerous-add a layer of unpredictability. There's always this looming sense that things could go bad at any second, and that definitely kept me invested.

The performances also deserve some credit. The actors bring enough emotional depth to make you care about their struggle. You can feel the fear and the weariness in them, especially during the tougher moral moments when they're deciding whether to trust strangers or keep moving. That said, while the cast is solid, the characters themselves feel a little thin at times. There are moments when I wanted to know more about their pasts or what drives them beyond just survival. The film hints at deeper emotions but doesn't quite dig deep enough to make the characters feel fully fleshed out.

Visually, the movie is decent but nothing to write home about. The wasteland setting is bleak and unforgiving, which suits the story, but there's a kind of generic feel to it. It's the kind of landscape you've seen in plenty of other post-apocalyptic films, and I found myself wishing for just a bit more visual personality. The action sequences are engaging and well-paced, but there were moments when I felt like they leaned too much on standard tropes-running, hiding, close calls. It's effective but also a little predictable.

That kind of sums up the whole film. Silent Zone doesn't do much wrong, but it doesn't really stand out either. It plays it safe, which isn't necessarily bad, but it means the movie is more of a solid watch than an unforgettable experience. I never felt bored, but I also never felt blown away. It's competent, tense, and has some emotional beats that land well, but I couldn't shake the feeling that it could have pushed a little harder, dug a little deeper.

Still, if you're in the mood for a straightforward survival thriller with enough tension to keep you on edge, it's worth a watch. It doesn't try to be more than what it is, and in a way, I respect that. Just go in with tempered expectations, and you'll probably come away satisfied, if not overly impressed.