Alice et le maire

This film creates a delightful romantic setting for two subtle characters -- Alice and Mayor, both charming -- to build a dialog on current social politics that culminates in brilliant answers to current social-economic questions without breaching the comfort of a great date-night film. Brilliant balance! Profound, deeply rewarding, beautiful, charming and cute! One of my favorite films of all time. I saw this on a plane to Paris (English subtitles) and I strongly encourage you to bring it mainstream in America, at least in the independent theater network (where Woody Allen's films go). More please!

Alliance Française French Film Festival Alice is a philosopher who is invited to work for the Mayor of Lyon. Paul, the Mayor has reached the time in his life where he is suffering from a lack of new ideas, both political and of any other kind. Alice, unknowingly to herself is also having a crisis of self belief. Can these two very different people complete each other? What are the defining characteristics of a real friendship?

ALICE AND THE MAYOR is a slice of life gentle sort of film that touches lightly upon serious problems. There are no higher stakes and dramatic turns. But it's a timely reminder that those are often not needed to have a turmoil in one's soul.

The main focus of the film is in dialogue. It is swift, precise, somewhat intellectual but never snobbish. There are many characters, some are memorable even though they fleetingly enter and leave the scene. Fabrice Luchini, as the mayor, is warm, with not being overly friendly, and stern in a way that comes out as gentle. It's a complex character with only the tip of the iceberg being shown, but somehow we can feel the rest of it hidden away. A wonderful performance indeed.

This is not a film for everyone. It's very smooth and devoid of any sharp angles. If politics is a cutthroat business this is not how it's presented here. For most of the viewers the characters will seem to come from a parallel world. Even being very likeable, they are extremely detached from reality and this is the movie's weakest point.

I've enjoyed Fabrice Lucchini in a lot of movies, which is why I went to see this one. He does his usual fine job of creating a character. But the story didn't much interest me, and most of the rest of the characters were very formulaic. The speech the the mayor and his female assistant near the end of the movie was enthralling - a "why can't we have that sort of candidate" moment - but I don't know that it justified sitting through the rest of the movie.

The film is engaging, it makes us want to follow the story of Alice and the mayor Théraneau. Fabrice Luchini and Anaïs Demoustier have both great performances, and it makes it hard not to be caught by them. However, if we pay attention, while there are important discussions, most (certainly not all) of the supposedly brilliant ideas proposed by Alice are actually shallow and vague slogans: neither deep as the intellectuals who are criticized, nor pratical and effective as the politicians who are labeled as insensitive or dumb. As a matter of fact, even the (recurrently repeated by several characters) dichotomy between intellectuals and politicians make little sense. The several ideas proposed by Alice are not really connected, what makes them similar to the marketing texts the two characters say to oppose. How a brilliant attack on the financialization as they wrote may be compatible with the conclusion that the solution is "to be modest"? Perhaps this is the right film with the right actors, but the script lacks enough philosophy and political science for what it intends to.

Excellent actors, interesting-ish topic (local politics in a French city). At times I felt I was watching a documentary, some other times I felt I was there myself. The characters are very realistic in their frenchness and overall i found it an enjoyable watch. I do agree with some of the critics I have seen here and there regarding the dialogs: superficially they're good but if you engage too much in what is being discussed, it becomes apparent that it's not exactly at the level you'd expect from so-called intellectuals. In a way, it doesn't matter as it's more a comedy than an art house film but the main characters keep coming back to the subject of having ideas and the role of the « intellectual » in the society, making the above hard not to notice.