Soyuz spaseniya
- 2019
- 2h 16min
NOTE IMDb
5,2/10
1,8 k
MA NOTE
Ajouter une intrigue dans votre langueA group of officers of the Russian Imperial Guard prepare a revolt in December 1825, when about 3,000 officers and soldiers refused to swear allegiance to the new tsar.A group of officers of the Russian Imperial Guard prepare a revolt in December 1825, when about 3,000 officers and soldiers refused to swear allegiance to the new tsar.A group of officers of the Russian Imperial Guard prepare a revolt in December 1825, when about 3,000 officers and soldiers refused to swear allegiance to the new tsar.
- Réalisation
- Scénario
- Casting principal
- Récompenses
- 7 victoires et 7 nominations au total
Aleksei Guskov
- Knyaz Aleksey Sherbatov
- (as Aleksey Guskov)
Martins Kalita
- Glinka, ad'utant Miloradovicha
- (as Martinsh Kalita)
Marta Kessler
- Varya, Rileevs daugtter
- (as Marta Timofeeva)
Avis à la une
Highly recommend, great acting, great script, great music, fantastic special effects. I was fortunate enough to see this movie in the theater (twice), the standoff between the Decembrists and Nicholas I gave me chills, the movie makes you feel like you're almost there in Senate Square. Recommend reading a little about the Decembrists (at least their Wiki) before watching, will help you appreciate the odds they were up against and the sacrifice they made that much more.
Russia is making Hollywood look juvenile by comparison when they make films like this.
This movie is stunning and the story is extremely engaging.
I recommend this to everyone. It's much more classical and well made than any American movie from the past 10 years.
It's a well-done film, perhaps better if shot as a TV mini-series. I didn't get enough time to connect to all the characters essential to the plot but I did most especially with Emperor Nikolai and Sergei. The movie assumes you already know the backstory of the Decembrist Revolt and doesn't go in-depth with the issues and ideologies it presents. Nevertheless, it is well-shot and directed with beautiful locations and uniforms. Just a step below the BBC mini-series War and Peace. That sort of treatment is what was needed here. The score also felt out of place with the heavy and emotional scenes. Still a recommended watch for Napoleonic buffs.
I have no idea what the filmmakers were assuming. That Decembrist revolt is widely known to moviegoers, or that omitting the bulk of the details, cramming everything into two hours, and just bombarding the viewer with narration, time skips, and name inserts is going to immediately clue everyone in as to who is who, what they wanted, or even what side they are on. Or maybe they already knew that they would be commissioned to make a miniseries for TV out of what was left on the cutting floor.
Oh, would you look at that? The series came out in 2022.
Despite the fact that the standoff and subsequent suppression of the crowd are masterfully done, beautifully blending CGI and practical effects, the movie is lacking in everything else. Everyone besides Nicolas I is either bland or a caricature. Muravyov-Apostol gets a shoehorned, fictional love story that goes nowhere, adds nothing, and makes it all feel like studio encroachment because they knew that this was the only way they could make you root for the guy. The same mass appeal can be implied by a soundtrack featuring unfitting edits of rock music.
Obviously, the most prevalent topic of discussion is whether this movie is state-funded propaganda appealing to the masses to not "revolt," as inferred by all-knowing Russian liberals. What history books have they been smoking? If Kravchuk wanted, they could've leaned in so many directions to absolutely besmirch these people. From outlining what their actual bloody plan was on how to prevent counter-revolution to simply showing how Muravyov-Apostol tried to escape only to be stopped by his own soldiers angry at him for leading them to treason. If nothing else and truly almost nothing else is shown, the movie paints them as unscrupulous patriots and not as French-speaking, Voltaire-quoting, loathsome cowards who couldn't even shoot the tsar despite ample opportunity. They even presented Trubetskoy as not a miserable craven who just didn't want to come out, but as someone who thought he wouldn't need to because he saw Nicolas as weak, that he sees what direction the wind blows, and that he is going to fold any second. Which is so much more credit than even the Soviet interpretation of his action has ever given him.
Oh, would you look at that? The series came out in 2022.
Despite the fact that the standoff and subsequent suppression of the crowd are masterfully done, beautifully blending CGI and practical effects, the movie is lacking in everything else. Everyone besides Nicolas I is either bland or a caricature. Muravyov-Apostol gets a shoehorned, fictional love story that goes nowhere, adds nothing, and makes it all feel like studio encroachment because they knew that this was the only way they could make you root for the guy. The same mass appeal can be implied by a soundtrack featuring unfitting edits of rock music.
Obviously, the most prevalent topic of discussion is whether this movie is state-funded propaganda appealing to the masses to not "revolt," as inferred by all-knowing Russian liberals. What history books have they been smoking? If Kravchuk wanted, they could've leaned in so many directions to absolutely besmirch these people. From outlining what their actual bloody plan was on how to prevent counter-revolution to simply showing how Muravyov-Apostol tried to escape only to be stopped by his own soldiers angry at him for leading them to treason. If nothing else and truly almost nothing else is shown, the movie paints them as unscrupulous patriots and not as French-speaking, Voltaire-quoting, loathsome cowards who couldn't even shoot the tsar despite ample opportunity. They even presented Trubetskoy as not a miserable craven who just didn't want to come out, but as someone who thought he wouldn't need to because he saw Nicolas as weak, that he sees what direction the wind blows, and that he is going to fold any second. Which is so much more credit than even the Soviet interpretation of his action has ever given him.
I purchased this as a blue ray when it first came out because I love this period, and it wasn't disappointing. The only problem was the subtitles were really bad, incomplete, and sometimes would just vanish.
There is now a new version of it on YouTube with really good subtitles and scenes that were not in the first release. It is way better because you can follow the story. It is a great movie, and way more than a 5 and it is not propaganda, it is inspirational, unless of course you are a Russophobe.
Ask yourself, when all the rest of the countries have descended into a total mishmash of anarchy and mixed and competing cultures and races, what country will still exist in its purity. Russia, it is already a 1,000-year-old country, discount and disrespect it at your peril.
There is now a new version of it on YouTube with really good subtitles and scenes that were not in the first release. It is way better because you can follow the story. It is a great movie, and way more than a 5 and it is not propaganda, it is inspirational, unless of course you are a Russophobe.
Ask yourself, when all the rest of the countries have descended into a total mishmash of anarchy and mixed and competing cultures and races, what country will still exist in its purity. Russia, it is already a 1,000-year-old country, discount and disrespect it at your peril.
Le saviez-vous
- AnecdotesIn December 2019 Russian minister of culture of that time Vladimir Medinsky suggested to include the movie into the obligatory school program.
- GaffesSuch physical punishments in the army during and after the Napoleon wars were not proceeded, since they were cancelled by the order of commander Yakov Potemkin- They were only introduced in 1820 by commander Schwartz.
- ConnexionsEdited into Soyuz spaseniya. Vremya gneva: Épisode #1.1 (2022)
- Bandes originalesVladivostok 2000
Written and performed by Ilya Lagutenko
Meilleurs choix
Connectez-vous pour évaluer et suivre la liste de favoris afin de recevoir des recommandations personnalisées
- How long is Union of Salvation?Alimenté par Alexa
Détails
- Date de sortie
- Pays d’origine
- Site officiel
- Langue
- Aussi connu sous le nom de
- Union of Salvation
- Société de production
- Voir plus de crédits d'entreprise sur IMDbPro
Box-office
- Budget
- 700 000 000 RUR (estimé)
- Montant brut mondial
- 11 401 318 $US
- Durée
- 2h 16min(136 min)
- Couleur
Contribuer à cette page
Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant