NOTE IMDb
5,0/10
4,3 k
MA NOTE
Ajouter une intrigue dans votre langueA writer of crime stories discovers that reality is more criminal than the stories he writes.A writer of crime stories discovers that reality is more criminal than the stories he writes.A writer of crime stories discovers that reality is more criminal than the stories he writes.
- Réalisation
- Scénario
- Casting principal
Avis à la une
Watched for Pedro but it couldnt be worse. The worst movie ever.O
Cast and starring of Pedro Alonso, versus bad fiction and time waste.
Colour grading wasn't so high quality but 'watchable' but if you want to watch a good movie, you should go for another one.
Role playing of Alonso was really nice, as a psycho and murder psychologic things. Also gives some ideas and mottos to audience. But no satisfacting watch for a masterpiece enthusiasm.
Also directing and visual things were not awful, just parts and scenes were so long and sometimes artificial.
I'm not surprised by some of the negative reviews. This film starts off with a clever premise, that mixes in a Spanish social justice psychopath, reminiscent of "Dexter", with a literary bent and the world of high stakes corruption.
What follows tracks well, up to a point, where the lines between fact and fiction blur. What you are left with is open ended and up to you to interpret, with no solid conclusion.
Its a "tree falls in the woods" deal that is somewhat disconcerting. I can fully see why people who like a linear plot, with a tidy outcome might find it annoying.
I certainly felt a little disorientated but ultimately I was left feeling more positive about this film, than not. Sure its plot is light on detail but it makes its points with an enigmatic cleverness. The cast is well chosen, the characters interesting and the acting excellent.
It also makes some very pertinent points about the distance power places between people from distinct social strata, notions of corruption and the inequity of establishment justice.
7/10 from me.
What follows tracks well, up to a point, where the lines between fact and fiction blur. What you are left with is open ended and up to you to interpret, with no solid conclusion.
Its a "tree falls in the woods" deal that is somewhat disconcerting. I can fully see why people who like a linear plot, with a tidy outcome might find it annoying.
I certainly felt a little disorientated but ultimately I was left feeling more positive about this film, than not. Sure its plot is light on detail but it makes its points with an enigmatic cleverness. The cast is well chosen, the characters interesting and the acting excellent.
It also makes some very pertinent points about the distance power places between people from distinct social strata, notions of corruption and the inequity of establishment justice.
7/10 from me.
At the beginning I was interested but them it turned into something with no sense and you get lost in what they are trying to show.
The movie starts with a great premise: a sociopath writer, a swamp both actual and metaphorical and a power struggle in the mob.
The performances are great too.
Sadly the plot starts wobbling around aimlessly in the second part, hinting at social issues of various kind without really making a point about any of it.
Overall an interesting watch but not a revolutionary one
Le saviez-vous
- AnecdotesBased on the novel of the same name by Juanjo Braulio.
- GaffesQ says the Professor drives an Audi A8 when the car shown is actually an A6.
Meilleurs choix
Connectez-vous pour évaluer et suivre la liste de favoris afin de recevoir des recommandations personnalisées
- How long is The Silence of the Marsh?Alimenté par Alexa
Détails
- Date de sortie
- Pays d’origine
- Langue
- Aussi connu sous le nom de
- The Silence of the Marsh
- Lieux de tournage
- Sociétés de production
- Voir plus de crédits d'entreprise sur IMDbPro
Box-office
- Montant brut mondial
- 279 983 $US
- Durée
- 1h 32min(92 min)
- Couleur
- Mixage
- Rapport de forme
- 2.35 : 1
Contribuer à cette page
Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant