Richesse, luxure et trahison dans le contexte de l'Angleterre de l'époque de la Régence, vus à travers les yeux de la puissante famille Bridgerton.Richesse, luxure et trahison dans le contexte de l'Angleterre de l'époque de la Régence, vus à travers les yeux de la puissante famille Bridgerton.Richesse, luxure et trahison dans le contexte de l'Angleterre de l'époque de la Régence, vus à travers les yeux de la puissante famille Bridgerton.
- Récompensé par 2 Primetime Emmys
- 16 victoires et 100 nominations au total
Parcourir les épisodes
Résumé
Reviewers say 'Bridgerton' is lauded for its stunning costumes, diverse cast, and captivating narratives, though some critique its historical inaccuracies and modern touches. The romantic plot and character arcs receive mixed feedback, with praise for drama and occasional complaints about depth. Julie Andrews' narration is a standout feature. Criticisms include divergence from the original work and authenticity issues. Despite these, many find the series visually appealing and enjoyable.
Avis à la une
Claudia Jessie played Eloise with extreme class. Hope she continues to "stun the stage" in her future acting career!
Season 3 is boring. I cant even finish all episodes. I cant feel the chemistry between colin and penelope. I guess i expected too much. They tried to expand other characters too much and end up dimming the spotlight on colin and penelope. And the fact that they turned benedict into a bisexual is such a turn off. They are ruining the books. They are ruining the images i have for the main characters when i read the books. I think they should stick more to the original plot in the books because it's the main reason why people watch it at the 1st place anyway. I hope they will do better in the next season.
Let me just start that I am a fan of the books so I am watching this as I did when I watched all the live actions of Pride and Prejudice, with eyes finally getting my wish of seeing my fave books come to life, and I was not disappointed. Is it a masterpiece? NOT AT ALL. Is it accurate to the books? Not so much but they did get the heart of it. There's a lot of issue I find with it but somehow I still find myself watching it because I love the genre.
To note: If you are into the ACCURATE retelling of history then I'm telling you right now SKIP THIS. This isn't about the accurate retelling of history. So if the "diversity" and "wokeness", the designs of their costumes, the way they acted takes you away from the story because of inaccuracy then you will have a bad time. This isn't a documentary. This isn't a biography. This isn't a true story.
Now first of, the books star different siblings so each season will focus on different Bridgerton with splice inserts of side stories. S1 is more steamy and shoves a more lustful play on their romance it's a fake love turned real love trope. S2 is a slow burn and might be boring for some as it is less steamy, it's an enemies to lovers trope.
Now. If you're into the book series do give this a try! Of course it wouldn't be 100% accurate but I did feel that it was very true in how romance book genre goes. It's like a whimsical romance. Glazed over. Or whatever term. Something like those Hallmark Christmas romance movies but with more mature scenes. Modern music made classical. They really brought to life the family dynamic of the Bridgertons. I love how they interact with one another as a family.
Finally. If you're just looking for a Pride and Prejudice or historical setting romance show then do give this a try! You might just like it.
To note: If you are into the ACCURATE retelling of history then I'm telling you right now SKIP THIS. This isn't about the accurate retelling of history. So if the "diversity" and "wokeness", the designs of their costumes, the way they acted takes you away from the story because of inaccuracy then you will have a bad time. This isn't a documentary. This isn't a biography. This isn't a true story.
Now first of, the books star different siblings so each season will focus on different Bridgerton with splice inserts of side stories. S1 is more steamy and shoves a more lustful play on their romance it's a fake love turned real love trope. S2 is a slow burn and might be boring for some as it is less steamy, it's an enemies to lovers trope.
Now. If you're into the book series do give this a try! Of course it wouldn't be 100% accurate but I did feel that it was very true in how romance book genre goes. It's like a whimsical romance. Glazed over. Or whatever term. Something like those Hallmark Christmas romance movies but with more mature scenes. Modern music made classical. They really brought to life the family dynamic of the Bridgertons. I love how they interact with one another as a family.
Finally. If you're just looking for a Pride and Prejudice or historical setting romance show then do give this a try! You might just like it.
Fun for those who enjoy the frothy visual thrust, light story and modern casual take on costume drama. It's a trashy soap opera in a dream version of Regency. I do like the diversity in casting and experimentation in costume. Casting is strong. However I can't seem to appreciate this production as much as I wanted. I find the direction and delivery of lines tends to self conscious, loud, stagey and over the top. Also the soundtrack is the same thing again and again, pizzicato strings, not creative, boring that flattens depth of emotion or drama. Otherwise a heady trip with lots of short scenes whipping from one character to another. It's good, just not totally my cuppa. A pleasant pretty distraction.
Can we have the old showrunner back? Please.
There were only a handful of exciting episodes for season 3 and they didn't really make up for the others being so dull.
The plot structure they went for would have worked over at least 12 episodes instead of just 8. They clearly didn't want to give the romantic leads their time to shine which meant we didn't get time to fall in love with their love.
I think the assumption was that their friendship in was enough in previous seasons that we wouldn't need any time to buy their love. I need more time to see why after years they'd finally go for it. It was so awkward.
There were only a handful of exciting episodes for season 3 and they didn't really make up for the others being so dull.
The plot structure they went for would have worked over at least 12 episodes instead of just 8. They clearly didn't want to give the romantic leads their time to shine which meant we didn't get time to fall in love with their love.
I think the assumption was that their friendship in was enough in previous seasons that we wouldn't need any time to buy their love. I need more time to see why after years they'd finally go for it. It was so awkward.
Shondaland Series Through the Years
Shondaland Series Through the Years
From "Grey's Anatomy" and "Bridgerton" to "The Residence," take a look back at the stellar history of Shonda Rhimes' Shondaland series.
Le saviez-vous
- AnecdotesJonathan Bailey has prepared a manual on how to be a Bridgerton leading man or leading lady to pass on to his on-screen siblings for when it is their turn to be the focus of the show.
- Gaffes"Yellow line" road markings visible in several scenes, particularly early in Season 1 during filming around Royal Crescent in Bath. These line markings would not have been painted on until the 1950s, and serve to indicate that an area has limited or no parking facilities available.
- ConnexionsEdited into Colin, date cuenta (2024)
Meilleurs choix
Connectez-vous pour évaluer et suivre la liste de favoris afin de recevoir des recommandations personnalisées
- How many seasons does Bridgerton have?Alimenté par Alexa
Détails
- Date de sortie
- Pays d’origine
- Site officiel
- Langue
- Aussi connu sous le nom de
- Dòng Tộc Bridgerton
- Lieux de tournage
- Wilton House, Wilton, Salisbury, Wiltshire, Angleterre, Royaume-Uni(The Duke of Hastings' house in London exterior and debutants in court interior scene, Clyvedon's dining room)
- Sociétés de production
- Voir plus de crédits d'entreprise sur IMDbPro
- Durée1 heure
- Couleur
- Mixage
- Rapport de forme
- 2.00 : 1
Contribuer à cette page
Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant