Avis des utilisateurs

I quit after like... 15 minute? The acting is that bad and everything else is laughable.

OMG, there are so many anachronisms and incongruities in this movie that it's just IMPOSSIBLE to enjoy! This was made in England, and it seems like no one involved with the movie had ever even been to the USA. Let's break it down...

Incongruities / mistakes: 1. Crime scene tape is not white and blue in the US, it's suppose to be black and yellow. 2. We have door knobs over here, not door handles. 3. Police officials don't hold press conferences sitting down behind a rickety class room table in the US, they have a podium, or will possible hold the press conference outside the police building. 4. We don't have heat radiators in our individual offices. Offices have central heating. 5. The radiators in the detective's home are also distinctly British. 6. Several UK power outlets and light switches are visible thought out the movie. Jesus Christ you guys, how lazy are you?? 7. The police wouldn't arrest a notorious serial killer with just two guys with handguns and no bulletproof vests. 8. Main character's badge looks like something you buy off of eBay for a costume party.

Anachronisms / incorrect time: 1. In there very first scene at the bar there is a text plate stating it's 1978, but there's Electronic Dance Music (EDM) playing in the bar. In 1978?? WTF?? 2. The detective's computer is about almost 10 years to new for the time frame. 3. Police car outside the bar where the cops meet is probably 40(!) years to new! It's a brand new contemporary car, for christ's sake! 4. They didn't have HDTV or 3D motion graphics in news shows in the early 80s. 5. Ted Bundy's hair is all wrong. It looks like a modern haircut, which of course it is. 6. When we jump forward to 1989, the TV cameras are too new. They're just normal contemporary cameras. And again, contemporary cars are seen.

And then we get to the absolutely ridiculous American accents the actors put on. They're NOT EVEN CLOSE to sounding American. They sound like walking cliches of what a European might think an American sounds like, based off of 3 movies. This alone makes impossible for me to judge whether they're just horrible C-grade actors, or if they could possibly act if they got to stick to British English.

But the biggest problem--it's cardinal sin--is that it's just plain BORING!

I'm giving it a 2 since I guess technically it's not the absolute worst movie I've ever seen. But NOT MANY are worse. Stay away!

Bad American accents, a slow and uneventful storyline and poor acting. I would give this fim a miss

Terrible acting, awful dialogue, bad casting and historical inaccuracies (techno music in a 70s club??) make this one of the worst films I've seen. One of the few films I didn't watch through to the end. Could not take Bundy seriously because he looked like Sheldon Cooper.

Lots of positive reviews from people who made their accounts recently and reviewed only this one!

It's made in the UK with a British cast. The acting is not great, the treatment of the actual material is good but I recommend you read the book by Bob Keppel (who the main detective is based on)

This is not a good movie.

Incredible, really funny. The acting is genuinely the worst I've ever seen. I don't smoke weed but I can imagine this would be riot if you watched it a bit stoned. Hilarious

Bad acting, bad lines, just bad!!!! Watched all of it, and I will never get this time back. At first I though it's arty and made this way with purpose. And then the realization that it's bad because it's just bad. Lara Goodison(29 years old) plays Detective Richards young daughter. She's nearly 30 in real life!!!!!! We could tell! Worst scene is the not so high speed chase in the forest. Best giggle I've had in ages. Jump ahead in time and finally the killer is caught!! And very strangely nobody has aged at all. What a great story to tell and what a terrible way to tell it! There was not one good part of this movie.

Great concept. Horrible low budget production with the worse actors on the planet that sound like they're reading straight from cue cards. This reminds me of Gravitas Adventures junk movies that they attempt to make. Do not waste your time.

Ive genuinely created an account just to leave this review.

It's quite possibly the worst film I've ever watched, terrible acting, horrific accents, no plot.

I would rather have head butted a wall for 2 hours

The acting is so bad. I watched 15mins but I shouldnt have even wasted that much time. There wasnt one single decent actor!

Detective David Richards (played by former Eastenders star Mark Homer) leads the hunt for notorious serial killer The Green River Killer. With no leads to go on he agrees to visit Ted Bundy in prison hoping that the unique insights of one serial killer will help him catch another. Bundy and The Green River Killer plays out like a classic TV detective thriller rather than the dime-by-dozen serial killer biopics we've seen in last few years. I really appreciated the tense build up, human drama and gloomy atmosphere. Mark Homer has grown as an actor since we last saw him on the small screen but Jared Nelson steals the show as Gary Ridgway. He's genuinely creepy in every scene and nails Ridgeway's mannerisms. What surprised me the most though is the attention to detail and re-search that went into getting all the facts straight (only names of victims and the detective were changed). The only casting choice I had a problem with was Richard Mark, he does not look like Ted Bundy and is missing Bundy's charm (I also found his british accent very distracting). Overall an excellent and suspenseful thriller from the North Bank Team (Though regular Lee Bane are sadly missing) .This is a big growth and new territory for director Andrew Jones and easily one of his best films to date. I can't wait to see what he will do next.

The movie plays mostly like an old TV cop show following the main detective and FBI guy as they hunt down the Green River Killer and talk about serial killing. Most of the facts of the real case are followed closely but if you are aware of the true story it makes the film fairly predictable with few surprises. The best part of the movie is the performances by the actors playing Bundy and Ridgway. Both are very creepy and their scenes are by far the best parts of this movie.

Almost everything about this movie was so bad - the acting, the whole cinematic experience and so on, and so on. A total was of time, it looks like someone made this movie as homework or some kind of student project.

It is so bad to watch that I actually watched it till the end since I was curious it it can get any worse... I can honestly say that this is the worst made movie I have seen in my life - some scenes make absolutely no sense and as for the acting - I bet you can get random people from the street and they would actually do better.

The only somewhat interesting thing is the story...

Whoever spent a million dollars on this train wreck, can you please send me my $1.85 I wasted at the redbox??

The corpses in the river were the best actors in this dross, I nodded off in the hope I'd sleep through it. I didn't. I woke only ten minutes later to the grating nasal tone of 'Ted Bundy'. I hope the real-life police officer had a little more charisma than the actor who played him in this film.

So here's a first...I'm going to 'review' a movie that I haven't actually sat through. I simply can't, or won't, to be more precise. The first scene, as already mentioned, is set in 1978 in a nightclub - with banging dance music blaring. That is just really lazy. And it gets worse. Dreadful acting/script, the sets don't even remotely look 70s, I could go on.... and the movies only just started. So, I've stopped watching it but felt like popping this review up here cause.... why not?

I very rarely, if ever, put up reviews this bad, because someone worked hard to get their dream off the ground. But when you make a film and just can't be bothered to get simple things right that would cost nothing, you simply don't deserve to be making movies. Disgraceful really.....

Watch the first few scenes just to see what I mean - it's on UK Netflix....

This movie is so bad I had to open an IMDb account just to review it negatively. This is my first review ever in my life although I am a huge cinema lover. I physically felt the need to write a review because what the hell is going on here. Dialogues are poor, acting is even worse. I swear actors in commercials often deliver better performances than these ones have.

OMG.. there was everything wrong with this movie.. "acting", actors, writing, camera, music, make-up... i really didn't like anything!

Wow! I have seen some low budget stuff over the years and even made some myself but this is something else. It was all blatantly filmed in the UK with British radiators and sockets in full view. There is blatant disregard for the concept of time and fact. It was all modern not 70s and 80s, occasionally there would be a close up on a 70s mug and that would be it...and who cast Pee Wee Herman as Bundy? I also couldn't understand why they didn't age the actors for the 2001 sequence.

Since the early 2000s there's been a glut of straight-to-video offerings based on real serial killers. I think at this point every infamous American murderer has had their mug slapped on a DVD cover. Bundy especially! Most of the movies play fast and loose with the facts and many end up being pretty sleazy low-budget horror flicks which make you feel like you want to shower after seeing them. This is a very modestly budgeted entry in the serial killer genre but in giving it a chance I found it to be a surprisingly adequate documentary-style drama which tries to stick to the facts about the Green River Killer. One of the drawbacks of that approach is you get a talky film without much action but the horrifying moments which show the evil of the killers are effectively done. The sorority house murder by Bundy is particularly well executed. At times the movie's determination to not be overly sensational makes the tone a bit tepid but I could overlook the duller moments because overall it gives a fairly solid rundown of the facts as well as a realistic depiction of an obsessed cop whose out of his depth dealing with two serial killers. Flawed for sure but not bad at all.

Pretty bad acting, and just wrong! All wrong with conversations, the daughter of the detective that's a teenager practically stays the same through all the movie, when at least 12 years passed by from ted Bundy death and the day the caught the river kiler don't waste your time absolutely.

I couldn't get more than 10 minutes in. Surely there were American actors who could have played the part?