Miller's Girl

The film had so much potential,so much backstory it could use to drive plot,for instance why is Jonathans wife an alcoholic and what exactly does she write? Why is she foul mouthed and why exactly does she constantly undermine her own husband.

The films dialogue was mature,atleast,F words were used, people insulted,none of the over the top infantalization of movies shown today where the characters speak only baby language in an effort to rake more money at the box office by making it pg13.

At times,the film was confusing,the character Cairo sweet laments that she is unremarkable and mature yet she destroys an entire man's life simply because of rejection.

It's unfair for Jonathan to be fired and it's unfair for his whole life to be brought down by a single incident that isnt even legal in most jurisprudences,a life should be structured in such a way that it is decentralized so that no bodies lives can be destroyed due to anger felt by any 3rd party.

The film was met with controversy, audiences critiqued the age gap in ridiculous amounts,but that was just an exercise in sanctimoniousness and indulgence in it as well as nothing more than a fear projected,I don't exactly know when when it was decided that such arrangements were "evil","immoral" and even "pedophilic" but they are not Age Gap arrangements are not necessarily any of those let alone a fully blown psychiatric disorder.

The film wanted to put this in full show, specific societies across the western world bad a mirror put Infront of them and they didn't like what the saw so they reacted partly in due to cognitive dissonance since such actions are depicted in collosal amounts in adult content and often have power imbalances that are too great.

For some reason it is assumed that age Gap arrangements have 2 parties,the first party is the older one that is "predatory" and the second "being taken advantage of" effectively undermining the freewill and decision of the parties (M&F).

The film was unfairly critiqued and given a low score first by failed actors that indulge in their pedanticness and their pseudo image as beimg cinematically "cultured" that will often bash a film that is controversial by mimicking exactly what the average person is saying but in bigger words and by audiences particularly women that have had negative experiences with that leading them to shout their anecdotals as universal truths.

I rated the film a 6/10 because of other factors such an incomplete plot, confusion,lack of character building in some parts and failure to properly distinguish between imagined scenes and real scenes as well as the subtle undertones of proselytizing certain narratives and the almighty way everyone cut of Jonathan and left him even though previously they were all friends for this.

Student teacher arrangements are illegal and bad,but age gap arrangements are not.

The film had good color grading and sound, aesthetically pleasing,and the classrooms for once were not boring and badly structured,there were carpets,oak tables,wooden cabinets,you could see an effort was made,and it wasn't the Plastic dullness most films show.

I wouldn't say it is a good film but it was Decent in it's own category.

A poetic cinematic experience that follows Cairo Sweet, a student fond of literature, looking for experiences to write for a writing assignment, and her teacher Jonathan Miller, in a story full of blurry lines.

The social commentary in Miller's Girl is accomplished in a tasteful gothic dreamlike style with a script that gives just enough information to let the audience fill in the blank spaces.

The film's greatest asset is depicting desire as something that has to be realized yet deludes its owner every time its reach is closer to fulfillment, making the situation ambiguously complex. This is rendered brilliantly throughout the film, especially in the dialogues the protagonist has with herself. An open door that lets us in in the melancholic naivety of what it means to be young and flawed in a world that values perfection above all, yet it is found nowhere, and that crave for independence from inherited beliefs, and the natural thrill and anxious ache for the unknown and uncharted territories.

18 year old Cairo Sweet (Jenna Ortega) lives alone in a mansion while her parents are away somewhere. Her new married creative writing teacher Jonathan Miller (Martin Freeman) takes an interest in her and she returns the interest with obsession. When he rejects her pornographic writing, all hell breaks loose.

This movie oscillates between aggressively written and aggressively overwritten. It is trying so hard to be edgy. Jenna Ortega is oozing her lines out. I almost appreciate how hard it is running with scissors. At the end of the day, I am more annoyed with it than appreciate it. It doesn't help that the movie stops short. There is another fifteen minutes or more to go.

I do enjoy when a movie's dialog provides its own review. This film was " overreaching without ambition." The pacing of the movie was horribly painful. It is never a good sign when I leave the action of the movie and find myself looking around thinking " I am sitting in a movie theater. " Martin Freeman is a terrific actor but the script absolutely failed him. His talents were so totally wasted. I found this to be hopelessly sad as I expected so much from the film.

The movie harps on the mediocrity of the protagonist and then tries to paint him as a villain. It just did not ring true. The script just kept missing; and, it was hard to keep pressing forward. With 45 minutes, or so, to go; I just wanted it to be over.

A creative writing assignment yields complex results between a teacher and his talented student.

I note many poor reviews and I'm unsure why that is. The acting is great from every single member of the cast.

The dialogue is meaningful and well thought out.

The plot echoes what is happening around the world right now with thousands of teachers and students: some will get caught and some won't. But it's real and so it's great to see the inner workings of the process, by such great acting and story telling.

There's even a bit in there about how women in fact have all the power in the world, they just don't realise it.

There's an insightful comment too about how "We know where the line is and don't cross it." Except some do, and when they have it's too late to walk it back.

I was surprised at Ortega's depth of character acting, but in hindsight perhaps not a great distance from her Wednesday character.

But there's an interplay between her and Winnie, as power and courage shift between one and the other as the story goes on.

Great film, I liked it a lot.