Examen captivant des crimes non résolus du Golden State Killer qui a terrorisé la Californie dans les années 1970 et 1980.Examen captivant des crimes non résolus du Golden State Killer qui a terrorisé la Californie dans les années 1970 et 1980.Examen captivant des crimes non résolus du Golden State Killer qui a terrorisé la Californie dans les années 1970 et 1980.
- Récompenses
- 2 victoires et 4 nominations au total
Parcourir les épisodes
Avis à la une
This is a story about Michelle's chase of the EAR/ONS but it's truly a master class in documentary filmmaking. The chase gets under your skin. It unveils itself in a breathtaking manner. I am amazed that I hadn't heard more about the crime and the chase before this film.
As others have noted, this series is as much about Michelle McNamara as it is about the California rapes and murders. McNamara's story --- a sad but unremarkable descent into obsession and addiction --- is simply not interesting enough to justify the extended treatment it gets. The series is on surer footing when its focus shifts to the crimes and, in particular, to the victims of those crimes.
This is a documentary style series on the journey of the writer who became possessed with investigating the series of rapes and murders in California. Very interesting first person account of the writer and her path of investigating these cases.
Would recommend - enjoyed the series but saddened by the true events.
Would recommend - enjoyed the series but saddened by the true events.
This series is advertised as being a true cime story about the Golden State Killer.
Very quickly in the first episode, you feel like it's rather an advert for Michelle McNamarra's blog, podcast and book. The blog's URL is repeated multiple times like these bad adverts for car insurance and we're told by various people how great Michelle is and how great her book is going to be.
A lot of time is spent explaining how Michelle got interested in the case, how she investigated it, how she got access to evidence and sources, her thoughts and theories and how she wrote about it all.
Is this just a badly disguised tribute to Michelle from her family and friends?
If you stick with it, you do end up hearing from the victims and their story, and how the GSK operated but it does take a while.
The episodes though are often a jumble of bits which don't seem to have a particular order or flow to them. You don't feel like you are progressing through time or through an investigation. It's more like listening to someone remembering parts of Michelle's life story in random order until you reach the point when the crimes themselves are discussed. This makes it difficult to get into and at times quite boring.
Had they stuck to talking about the crimes, victims and investigations/evidence, it would have been a 2 (perhaps 3) episodes series but interesting throughout.
This is simply excellent documentary filmmaking.
I'm very familiar with the EAR/ONS (Golden Stare Killer) case having studied it on my own for many years. Of course, I'm ecstatic with the arrest of a suspect (leaving name out since he's not convicted) as I'm sure Michelle would be too. The first episode really hit home because I know what it's like to spend hour after hour day after day obsessed with amateur detective work. You sometimes wonder if you're having any impact at all and are often mocked for trying to shed light into places where it's never landed before. Michelle's work proved that amateur slueuthing can make a difference in subtle and important ways. Would the case have been solved without her contributions? Maybe, even probably, but that's not really the point. Her work demonstrates that the victims in these terrible crimes do matter, no matter how long the cases remain unsolved. The victims matter to her and to all of those who strive to solve these mysteries, and it's that fact that keeps amateur detectives motivated to the point of obsession and NOT some morbid fascination with human tragedy.
I said all of the above because I feel the filmmakers have done an excellent job capturing the real motivations for people like Michelle McNamara and all other armchair detectives. Since the subject matter is both the Golden State Killer case and Michelle McNamara's obsession with it, it's much more nuanced than a more traditional true-crime documentary where the subjects are generally comprised of police officers, the subject of their investigation, and, on occasion, surviving victims and family members. 'I'll Be Gone in the Dark' functions on all of those levels too but also goes deeper by using a non-traditional protagonist. The filmmakers deserve kudos for utilizing this unique angle, and in the first episode they've done an excellent job of setting up the the characters and the conflict of the documentary.
If the remaining episodes are on par with the first, this documentary series will easily score an 8/10.
(Note: I am not affiliated with the filmmakers, Michelle McNamara, or her estate in any way. The above review reflects my unbiased opinion of this documentary. Rest in peace Michelle.)
Le saviez-vous
- AnecdotesAimee Mann performs the series theme song: a cover of Leonard Cohen's "Avalanche".
- GaffesThe reenactment clips of Michelle McNamara doing her investigative work are supposed to be set in the early 2010s, but the Apple devices she's shown using are from the latter part of that decade.
- ConnexionsFeatured in Sky News @Breakfast: Épisode datant du 28 août 2020 (2020)
Meilleurs choix
Connectez-vous pour évaluer et suivre la liste de favoris afin de recevoir des recommandations personnalisées
- How many seasons does I'll Be Gone in the Dark have?Alimenté par Alexa
Détails
- Durée50 minutes
- Couleur
Contribuer à cette page
Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant
Lacune principale
What is the German language plot outline for I'll Be Gone in the Dark (2020)?
Répondre