Récit de la 2ème Guerre Mondiale centré sur les vies de personnes ordinaires affectées par la guerre.Récit de la 2ème Guerre Mondiale centré sur les vies de personnes ordinaires affectées par la guerre.Récit de la 2ème Guerre Mondiale centré sur les vies de personnes ordinaires affectées par la guerre.
- Récompenses
- 6 nominations au total
Parcourir les épisodes
Avis à la une
This is for people who want to know about confusion and pain, not the shoot them up pastiche of war that is typical. It's sibjective approach means it has nine of the grand narative, but that's exactly right for the humane film it is
Really amazed at amount of critical reviewers who base their criticism of a drama on history. This is a fictional account of some personal experiences of WWII not a documentary. Using your criteria, then all drama must be reviewed in terms of history and condemned if not absolutely accurate. Also, amazed that some reviewers are concerned about the bad depiction of Nazis and the display of blatant homophobic remarks as well as using the typical PC attack. I do see homophobic remarks in many reviews of any movie/series that has major gay roles. Looks like lots of right-wing and possibly Nazi nuts reviewing this but I guess that is to be expected when WWII related presentations are involved. But even with all this negativity, it has a decent rating because this series is well presented and acted. Great dramatic presentation of personal experiences and the challenges and heartache they faced in a horrific crisis.
Below the line is my original post.
I've just finished episode 4, and I've lowered my rating to a "2/10". Unbelievable that they've obviously used writers that have *zero* knowledge of basic warfare, or tactics of WWII. The British soldiers are portrayed as unorganised idiots that are so happy-go-lucky that they keep getting surprised by Germans because they don't even post sentries! For the record, at the beginning of the war, Brits were fierce warriors, even though severely outgunned.
The Germans in Poland keep falling for the female bait to their doom, but there's no retaliation against the innocent citizens?!
Oh, it's getting very, very bad, and not even Sean Bean can help this one.
I'll keep watching, but *only* because there's three episodes left.
Original.....................................................................................V
I was quite stoked for this after the first episode, even excusing some of the bad writing. I gave it a generous "9".
After the second episode, it's obvious that the men are weak, bumbling incompetents.
All the women are the leaders, strong, defiant, organized, and in charge.
Too bad that Hollywood has corrupted British film makers...
My rating slid to "5" stars, I'll adjust as necessary as the series progresses.
I've just finished episode 4, and I've lowered my rating to a "2/10". Unbelievable that they've obviously used writers that have *zero* knowledge of basic warfare, or tactics of WWII. The British soldiers are portrayed as unorganised idiots that are so happy-go-lucky that they keep getting surprised by Germans because they don't even post sentries! For the record, at the beginning of the war, Brits were fierce warriors, even though severely outgunned.
The Germans in Poland keep falling for the female bait to their doom, but there's no retaliation against the innocent citizens?!
Oh, it's getting very, very bad, and not even Sean Bean can help this one.
I'll keep watching, but *only* because there's three episodes left.
Original.....................................................................................V
I was quite stoked for this after the first episode, even excusing some of the bad writing. I gave it a generous "9".
After the second episode, it's obvious that the men are weak, bumbling incompetents.
All the women are the leaders, strong, defiant, organized, and in charge.
Too bad that Hollywood has corrupted British film makers...
My rating slid to "5" stars, I'll adjust as necessary as the series progresses.
1/10.... reallly?
Poor acting... really?
You are on this forum, as am I, for ONE reason - to convey the cinematic qualities of what we have before us. This is NOT a historical debate forum. I'm glad we got that out of the way....
World on Fire delivers. It doesn't deliver historical accuracy - but it delivers "the sense of the moment" and it does so pretty damn well.
This is a half full glas and it's contents are pretty tasty. Any review below 6/10 cannot be taken seriously.
Enjoy.
You are on this forum, as am I, for ONE reason - to convey the cinematic qualities of what we have before us. This is NOT a historical debate forum. I'm glad we got that out of the way....
World on Fire delivers. It doesn't deliver historical accuracy - but it delivers "the sense of the moment" and it does so pretty damn well.
This is a half full glas and it's contents are pretty tasty. Any review below 6/10 cannot be taken seriously.
Enjoy.
I thoroughly enjoyed the first episode and am already feel empathy towards some of the characters and look forward to seeing how their lives pan out. I particularly liked that you can see the human drama play out against the backdrop of war and not vice versa. Hope it stays this way and l shall look forward to Sunday nights.
Le saviez-vous
- AnecdotesThe weaponry in the Danzig Post Office is, in part, wrong. The Poles used their version of the American Browning Automatic Rifle (BAR). The program armed them with British BREN guns.
- GaffesThe characters of Kasia and her mother are listed in the credits with the surname Tomaszeski. However, as women their name in Polish would be Tomaszeska.
Meilleurs choix
Connectez-vous pour évaluer et suivre la liste de favoris afin de recevoir des recommandations personnalisées
- How many seasons does World on Fire have?Alimenté par Alexa
Détails
- Durée57 minutes
- Couleur
Contribuer à cette page
Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant
Lacune principale
What was the official certification given to Un monde en feu (2019) in Canada?
Répondre