NOTE IMDb
5,5/10
5,5 k
MA NOTE
L'histoire d'un noble devenu héros hors-la-loi qui fut couronné roi d'Écosse au 14ème siècle.L'histoire d'un noble devenu héros hors-la-loi qui fut couronné roi d'Écosse au 14ème siècle.L'histoire d'un noble devenu héros hors-la-loi qui fut couronné roi d'Écosse au 14ème siècle.
- Réalisation
- Scénario
- Casting principal
- Récompenses
- 1 nomination au total
Talitha Eliana Bateman
- Iver
- (as Talitha Bateman)
Anthony J. Sharpe
- Jacobus Crier
- (as Anthony Sharpe)
Chris Davis
- Hanging Man
- (as Chris 'Shadow' Davis)
Résumé
Reviewers say 'Robert the Bruce' delves into the psychological and emotional struggles of its titular character, showcasing his journey from despair to purpose. Angus Macfadyen's nuanced portrayal is widely praised, along with the film's focus on character development and historical context. However, criticisms include the slow pace, lack of major battles, and deviations from historical accuracy. Some find the low budget and minimal action disappointing compared to 'Braveheart', yet many appreciate the introspective approach to the historical figure.
Avis à la une
I am going to start by saying that the accents in this film are diabolical. Apart from the main star, Angus McFadyen, I found it painful to listen to everyone attempting to try a generic Scottish accent. For this reason I am deducting stars, because I couldn't concentrate on the plot.
The film runs at a very slow pace, which does add to the atmosphere but almost at the detriment of keeping the viewer's interest.
On the plus Angus McFadyen is great in the role as Robert and it is truly wonderful to see him in this role again (after 24 years since Braveheart). The action that we see is very well done and you can tell there is a lot of love in this film.
I would recommend this as a film you could watch in an afternoon but I wouldn't say that this is a film I would desperately go out of my way see otherwise.
The film runs at a very slow pace, which does add to the atmosphere but almost at the detriment of keeping the viewer's interest.
On the plus Angus McFadyen is great in the role as Robert and it is truly wonderful to see him in this role again (after 24 years since Braveheart). The action that we see is very well done and you can tell there is a lot of love in this film.
I would recommend this as a film you could watch in an afternoon but I wouldn't say that this is a film I would desperately go out of my way see otherwise.
I thoroughly enjoyed this film seeing him in a different light and all his vulnerabilities on show. It was very moving and hits you in the heart. Beautifully done and loved it. Look forward to next one. Please say there will be a next chapter.
First thing to say is with Braveheart still casting a long shadow over this period in Scotland's history and the more recent Outlaw King proving an entertaining if flawed take on The Bruce, the writers of this had a decision to make.
Clearly the decision to focus on Robert the Bruce's months in hiding was as much a financial decision as any artistic one. With the filming taking place in Montana, a largely unknown non Scottish cast and a novice director the budget constraints were more than apparent on screen.
This is not necessarily a barrier to making a watchable film but the idea that his months in hiding would make for an entertaining two hours was naive at best.
What we see is a fairly well worn tale of wounded hero taken in by noble peasant family until fit to return to his feet.
The young cast all perform well as does the mother Morag despite the limitations of the script but one speech in particular from the daughter is so maudlin it nearly ruins her entire performance.
Along with the stock medieval goons and villains pursuing The Bruce for the bounty on his head, the wonky sometimes laughable accents and a liberty taking retelling of The Bruce's altercation with John Comyn, the film casts The Bruce as a Taciturn almost mute figure when he is on screen.
This is meant to convey inner turmoil obviously but it unfortunately turns the film into a giant slog. Two hours feel like three and when do get some action at the end it is like sn Oasis in the desert. Even though it is a fairly standard battle sequence.
There are dozens of 10/10 reviews for this film here. And while I can't pretend to know exactly why they chose to score it this highly I can take a pretty good guess.
Unlike my fellow Yes voters I have to be honest. This just wasn't very good and was fatally flawed from the get go with the decision to include no real moments of spectacle.
If you're after a film about The Bruce then Outlaw King is still the best one out there. Just watch that.
Clearly the decision to focus on Robert the Bruce's months in hiding was as much a financial decision as any artistic one. With the filming taking place in Montana, a largely unknown non Scottish cast and a novice director the budget constraints were more than apparent on screen.
This is not necessarily a barrier to making a watchable film but the idea that his months in hiding would make for an entertaining two hours was naive at best.
What we see is a fairly well worn tale of wounded hero taken in by noble peasant family until fit to return to his feet.
The young cast all perform well as does the mother Morag despite the limitations of the script but one speech in particular from the daughter is so maudlin it nearly ruins her entire performance.
Along with the stock medieval goons and villains pursuing The Bruce for the bounty on his head, the wonky sometimes laughable accents and a liberty taking retelling of The Bruce's altercation with John Comyn, the film casts The Bruce as a Taciturn almost mute figure when he is on screen.
This is meant to convey inner turmoil obviously but it unfortunately turns the film into a giant slog. Two hours feel like three and when do get some action at the end it is like sn Oasis in the desert. Even though it is a fairly standard battle sequence.
There are dozens of 10/10 reviews for this film here. And while I can't pretend to know exactly why they chose to score it this highly I can take a pretty good guess.
Unlike my fellow Yes voters I have to be honest. This just wasn't very good and was fatally flawed from the get go with the decision to include no real moments of spectacle.
If you're after a film about The Bruce then Outlaw King is still the best one out there. Just watch that.
Good and accurate. but... Robert The Bruce in 1306 had 32 years old... so maybe the choice of Angus MacFayden wasn't a good one... looking at him it seems that 25 years from the death of William Wallace has passed and not only 1 :-) :-) :-)
Ok!
To be fare straight!
This movie is not so bad if you expecting a Drama movie.
But for those who's looking for action is not for you.
I was disappointed at this movie because Angus Macfadyen was playing the part as Robert the Bruce. The same actor playing Robert the Bruce on Brave heart. So my expectation was very high.
It was said that this movie was kind a sequel to Brave Heart, and the storyline from that movie to this one fits very good. But it doesn't have the same style as Brave Heart. This is more like Drama movie with a low budget production.
Not much really happens in the movie. Not much action at all except for one ore two fighting scenes. The rest is just drama.
The movie focus on Robert the Bruce hiding from other Scott's in a cave because of a price on his head. Actually the movie dose not show so much about Robert. Instead it's has it focus on another family with a mother telling stories about Robert to her kids. Robert do not appear much in this movie and has not so many lines.
This movie was not for me and I lost focus so many times in this movie because I got so bored.
To be fare straight!
This movie is not so bad if you expecting a Drama movie.
But for those who's looking for action is not for you.
I was disappointed at this movie because Angus Macfadyen was playing the part as Robert the Bruce. The same actor playing Robert the Bruce on Brave heart. So my expectation was very high.
It was said that this movie was kind a sequel to Brave Heart, and the storyline from that movie to this one fits very good. But it doesn't have the same style as Brave Heart. This is more like Drama movie with a low budget production.
Not much really happens in the movie. Not much action at all except for one ore two fighting scenes. The rest is just drama.
The movie focus on Robert the Bruce hiding from other Scott's in a cave because of a price on his head. Actually the movie dose not show so much about Robert. Instead it's has it focus on another family with a mother telling stories about Robert to her kids. Robert do not appear much in this movie and has not so many lines.
This movie was not for me and I lost focus so many times in this movie because I got so bored.
Le saviez-vous
- AnecdotesMhairi Calvey, who plays Robert the Bruce's wife Elizabeth de Bugh, previously played the younger version of Murron, William Wallace's wife, in Braveheart (1995).
- GaffesCharacters repeatedly carry their swords in a belt without a scabbard, and thrust their swords into snow or the ground for convenience. This is damaging to the blade. Swords were expensive and one's life depended on them.
- ConnexionsSpin-off from Braveheart (1995)
Meilleurs choix
Connectez-vous pour évaluer et suivre la liste de favoris afin de recevoir des recommandations personnalisées
- How long is Robert the Bruce?Alimenté par Alexa
Détails
- Date de sortie
- Pays d’origine
- Site officiel
- Langue
- Aussi connu sous le nom de
- Robert the Bruce: King of Scots
- Lieux de tournage
- Sociétés de production
- Voir plus de crédits d'entreprise sur IMDbPro
Box-office
- Montant brut mondial
- 23 425 $US
- Durée
- 2h 4min(124 min)
- Couleur
- Rapport de forme
- 2.39 : 1
Contribuer à cette page
Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant