NOTE IMDb
4,2/10
3,6 k
MA NOTE
Ellie, une ex-toxicomane, déménage dans une nouvelle ville avec ses deux enfants adolescents. Luttant pour rester clean, sa vie bascule quand elle rencontre Christopher, un drogué d'une autr... Tout lireEllie, une ex-toxicomane, déménage dans une nouvelle ville avec ses deux enfants adolescents. Luttant pour rester clean, sa vie bascule quand elle rencontre Christopher, un drogué d'une autre espèce.Ellie, une ex-toxicomane, déménage dans une nouvelle ville avec ses deux enfants adolescents. Luttant pour rester clean, sa vie bascule quand elle rencontre Christopher, un drogué d'une autre espèce.
- Réalisation
- Scénario
- Casting principal
Bishop Ali Stevens
- Pawn Salesman
- (as Bishop Stevens)
Matthew Davis
- Drug Addict
- (non crédité)
David Dickerson
- Dead Parent
- (non crédité)
Nicholas Palacio
- Busboy
- (non crédité)
Avis à la une
Watched this with a couple of friends, the movie was very generic and boring, overdone plot and had forgettable characters, wouldn't recommend this
3/10
I liked the story line. I liked the slow and steady pace. I really enjoy movies with those qualities. I also love that it's not a volume roller coaster. You know, louder than hell and then suddenly the actors are whispering and then loud again and back and forth. I hate riding the volume buttons on my remote as I'm watching a movie. What I didn't like is how dark it was. I love a dark themed movie but I can't stand when I can't see everything on the screen. I know that may not make sense to a lot of people but there's a difference between a dark movie and a poorly lit movie. But that's just me. My two cents.
So far, Blumhouse Films has done no wrong in my eyes. You can pretty much cover your eyes, point your finger to any one of their titles, and still come up a winner. "Family Blood," unfortunately, wasn't one of those.
Yes, it's a vampire story. And, yes, there were variations to that mythos on display here. But that couldn't make up for the fact that the movie was a long, slow-burning chore with characters you don't really care about. At least the filmmakers didn't throw the whole AA/NA concept down your throat...that much.
Yes, it's a vampire story. And, yes, there were variations to that mythos on display here. But that couldn't make up for the fact that the movie was a long, slow-burning chore with characters you don't really care about. At least the filmmakers didn't throw the whole AA/NA concept down your throat...that much.
Remember Vinessa Shaw? She was the lead female (Excluding the witches) in cult favorite Hocus Pocus (1993). Since then she's done.........and then there was.........and who could forget? Erm, stuff?
Here she leads as a former drug addict turned vampire and the affect it has on her and her two children. I can't help but feel like the whole movie was one big metaphor for addiction.
There is a problem though and it's a big one. The movie is unforgivably boring, so boring in fact I fell asleep about 1/3 of the way through and had to watch the thing from scratch again the next day.
It's SO lifeless, the characters simply aren't likeable and honestly until the last few minutes nothing happens. On top of that I see people claiming this is a new spin on the tired vampire formula, my question is how? How is this a new spin? This has been done before, the whole thing is devoid of originality.
Not one for fans of vampire cinema or for that matter cinema period.
The Good:
.......nope
The Bad:
I actually fell asleep and had to watch it again
So boring
Lifeless nonsense
Things I Learnt From This Movie:
Vinessa Shaw has nothing to contribute to the industry
Regular vampires > Twilight Vampires > These vampires
Here she leads as a former drug addict turned vampire and the affect it has on her and her two children. I can't help but feel like the whole movie was one big metaphor for addiction.
There is a problem though and it's a big one. The movie is unforgivably boring, so boring in fact I fell asleep about 1/3 of the way through and had to watch the thing from scratch again the next day.
It's SO lifeless, the characters simply aren't likeable and honestly until the last few minutes nothing happens. On top of that I see people claiming this is a new spin on the tired vampire formula, my question is how? How is this a new spin? This has been done before, the whole thing is devoid of originality.
Not one for fans of vampire cinema or for that matter cinema period.
The Good:
.......nope
The Bad:
I actually fell asleep and had to watch it again
So boring
Lifeless nonsense
Things I Learnt From This Movie:
Vinessa Shaw has nothing to contribute to the industry
Regular vampires > Twilight Vampires > These vampires
Different from what you might be used to but with that comes intrigue. Only complaint is that despite the slow process, character development was kind of a miss, as well as certain aspects of the movie where they had a chance to totally invent itself since it was a pretty original idea. Instead they fell back on tired ideas. When it comes to casting not to bad pretty good fits except for a role that really wasn't too important. Ajiino Alexus did a fine job but doesn't pass for a high school kid, which falls on the casting director. If you have time give it a watch.
Le saviez-vous
- Bandes originalesLost in the Night
Written by Tom Schraeder
Performed by Tom Schraeder, Dave Lugo, Russ Mallord
Meilleurs choix
Connectez-vous pour évaluer et suivre la liste de favoris afin de recevoir des recommandations personnalisées
- How long is Family Blood?Alimenté par Alexa
Détails
- Durée1 heure 32 minutes
- Couleur
- Rapport de forme
- 2.35 : 1
Contribuer à cette page
Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant
Lacune principale
What is the Brazilian Portuguese language plot outline for Family Blood (2018)?
Répondre