L'histoire vraie de l'équipe d'échecs du lycée de Miami Jackson High School, qui a été la première équipe de quartiers défavorisés à remporter le championnat national d'échecs des États-Unis... Tout lireL'histoire vraie de l'équipe d'échecs du lycée de Miami Jackson High School, qui a été la première équipe de quartiers défavorisés à remporter le championnat national d'échecs des États-Unis.L'histoire vraie de l'équipe d'échecs du lycée de Miami Jackson High School, qui a été la première équipe de quartiers défavorisés à remporter le championnat national d'échecs des États-Unis.
- Réalisation
- Scénario
- Casting principal
- Oelmy 'Ito' Paniagua
- (as Jorge Lendeborg)
- Rodelay Medina
- (as Angel Bismark Curiel)
Avis à la une
Admittedly, there could have been more in the way of character development (Sed's dad and Ito's backstory, for instance) and the minor plot (involving Ito and Andre) trails off a bit leaving the audience with more than a few questions. John Leguizamo inhabits his role as the teacher/coach as per usual and delivers an outstanding performance both as an actor and director. Also, Corwin C. Tuggles' portrayal of Sed was on point and, in my opinion, demonstrates his abilities as a serious dramatic actor and one to watch for the future.
All in all, whether you are a grandmaster or never played chess in your life, there is a lot to love about this heartwarming tale of resilience and overcoming adversity.
"Searching for Bobby Fisher" (1993) comes to mind as an example of one of those great movies that somehow disregarded the game entirely. I was horrified that they could make a movie about the game and purposely choose to remain ignorant of it, as if no one watching would notice. Yeah, guess who's gonna watch a movie about a famous chess player? Could it be.. other chess players?? I'm sure no one will notice that the games in the movie aren't real.
This movie is the first movie I've ever seen that uses actual historical games, play by play. It accurately uses the names of the openings, and has the actors playing the game for real as the viewer watches. The teacher talks about real historical chess players that shaped playing styles. That alone warrants 7 stars in my book.
The other two stars come from the quality of the film itself. This is not a movie about the game, it's about the people who played it. A group of "disadvantaged" kids who became winners. It's a great story. The actors did a great job. Character development was somewhat slim, but the viewer is carried along and learns to care about each of them. Their interplay is real, you really see that they are in touch with each other. John Leguizamo played a great part, I enjoyed it greatly.
The only reason I didn't give this a 10 was because I was put off just slightly by the "social justice" revising of history. José Raúl Capablanca didn't get marginalized and erased from history, that's a fabrication. He was world champion for 6 years and had a huge lasting influence on the game. Maybe the reason people don't know about him is because he was champion nearly 100 years ago. And Gabriel Maura from Puerto Rico? He did not "modernize" the game. He literally created a new version of it (called Modern Chess) which is popular in South America. That's why no one knows his name, it has nothing to do with his race. It has to do with the fact that these kids are living in the U.S. and don't play chess in South America. Shame shame people. -1 star.
Great movie, I really enjoyed it and I highly recommend it.
This is a real feel good film. It shows a true life story of triumph over adversity in a non-saccharin manner. The story telling avoids cliché and sentimentality. It does not dwell on the darkness of these young people's lives apart from when needed.
A truly remarkable film.
John Leguizamo directs here his first feature film that smacks of the 90s.
Nice to watch.
It's great to see how they actually explained chess with historic facts and that the actors played the game for real. It's also important to mention that these kind of movies make a difference in reminding kids to pursue not only their dreams, but most importantly the opportunities that open up to them.
Everybody has a chance to shine in life no matter where you come from or your ethnicity, it's all about wanting it.
Le saviez-vous
- AnecdotesMartinez started the after-school chess club in 1992 after his teacher's lounge rounds of chess with another teacher sparked student interest. His playing partner left the school that year and students began challenging him to matches so the club was born.
- GaffesDuring Ito's game at the regional tournament, both Ito and Martinez say that he is in "Zugzwang". However, in a real "Zugzwang" situation, a player loses only because he is forced to make a move, while Ito lose the same way even if it was his opponent's time to move, as he could take the pawn on d3 with the queen.
- Citations
Mr. Martinez: All right, now, people, this is gonna be very basic for some of you, but for the fish, or the newbies as I like to call you, this is gonna be eye opening because what you've got is 64 squares, 32 pieces, it doesn't matter how rich or poor you are, what Ivy League school you may go or you may not go to, what prison you hopefully never set foot in, because chess is the great equalizer.
- Crédits fousOver the credits, there are interviews with the real people who the movie is based on.
- Bandes originalesWhat Would You Do
Written by Timothy McNealy
Performed by Timothy McNealy
Published by Afrika Kuruvilla Kurian, BMI
Meilleurs choix
- How long is Critical Thinking?Alimenté par Alexa
Détails
Box-office
- Budget
- 3 000 000 $US (estimé)
- Montant brut mondial
- 20 322 $US
- Durée1 heure 57 minutes
- Couleur
- Rapport de forme
- 2.39 : 1