Ajouter une intrigue dans votre langueA vengeful ex-con goes on a 24 hour killing spree, never saying a word. The discredited detective investigating the case is convinced there is more to it than the evidence suggests.A vengeful ex-con goes on a 24 hour killing spree, never saying a word. The discredited detective investigating the case is convinced there is more to it than the evidence suggests.A vengeful ex-con goes on a 24 hour killing spree, never saying a word. The discredited detective investigating the case is convinced there is more to it than the evidence suggests.
- Récompenses
- 8 victoires au total
Avis à la une
Is this supposed to be a comedy ?
Awful acting, unrealistic scenarios and all round bad.
Couldn't watch after the first ten minutes of the annoying opening scene at the police station.
Also the background rap (or attempted rap) music is terrible.
Only one thing could have saved this and that would be for it not to have been made.
Awful.
Awful acting, unrealistic scenarios and all round bad.
Couldn't watch after the first ten minutes of the annoying opening scene at the police station.
Also the background rap (or attempted rap) music is terrible.
Only one thing could have saved this and that would be for it not to have been made.
Awful.
This film about a silent ex con seeking revenge is far more complicated for it's own good and many of the characters are straight from a cartoon I think. But its watchable but very bloated with an overly complex story and not enough action. But for a low budget film I've certainly seen worse.
Possibly the worst film I've ever seen, I say possibly as there must be worse I just can't think of one right now.
Let's start with the positive yep it's only one. Marc Bannerman was excellent, and considering I've seen more of this man incidentally on the street than on any screens in the last ten years I was surprised. Believable, didn't over do the tough guy routine a genuinely solid and enjoyable performance.
As for the rest, awful seriously absolutely awful. Wooden acting, ludicrous wardrobe decisions, even the sets made no sense. What police officer carries out interviews with a pen pot in reach of possibly dangerous suspects?
The dialogue was bordering on comical, the "story" about as engaging as watching ice melt if it wasn't for Bannerman occasionally popping in with some talent I wouldn't have got through it.
Save some time watch adverts you'll get more out of it
I've seen better student films. This looks like it has been shot on a camcorder, the audio sounds tinny and wrong, clearly they are running around with toy guns, the after effects gunshots look ridiculous.
The plot is just dumb. Acting is terrible. Any positive reviews are probably from the film maker and his mates.
Don't waste your time.
The plot is just dumb. Acting is terrible. Any positive reviews are probably from the film maker and his mates.
Don't waste your time.
Anyone who gives this more than 1 star is deluded. It's embarrassing! Worst film I've ever seen. I was fascinated to watch it to the very end, just because it was so bad. Awful, ridiculous story, the most terrible acting I've ever seen, worse than a primary school would make, bad audio recorded on an inline earphone mic I suspect. Just unbelievable that this even exists. Any positive reviews have definitely been brought. I haven't logged in to IMDB for years, but made the effort just for this. I even started clicking on other reviewers profiles to see if they were real. Sorry to guys who made it, as I hate to negate, but you just wasted 1:23 of my life.
Le saviez-vous
- AnecdotesThe actual production shoot was 8 days and featured a talking cast of 30 with 15 different location set-ups.
Meilleurs choix
Connectez-vous pour évaluer et suivre la liste de favoris afin de recevoir des recommandations personnalisées
Détails
- Durée1 heure 24 minutes
- Couleur
- Mixage
- Rapport de forme
- 2.35 : 1
Contribuer à cette page
Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant