Ajouter une intrigue dans votre langueA vengeful ex-con goes on a 24 hour killing spree, never saying a word. The discredited detective investigating the case is convinced there is more to it than the evidence suggests.A vengeful ex-con goes on a 24 hour killing spree, never saying a word. The discredited detective investigating the case is convinced there is more to it than the evidence suggests.A vengeful ex-con goes on a 24 hour killing spree, never saying a word. The discredited detective investigating the case is convinced there is more to it than the evidence suggests.
- Récompenses
- 8 victoires au total
Avis à la une
If not the worst then close to it. Bad acting, bad production, flimsy characters. I only gave it a 1 because I had to give it something
I've seen better student films. This looks like it has been shot on a camcorder, the audio sounds tinny and wrong, clearly they are running around with toy guns, the after effects gunshots look ridiculous.
The plot is just dumb. Acting is terrible. Any positive reviews are probably from the film maker and his mates.
Don't waste your time.
The plot is just dumb. Acting is terrible. Any positive reviews are probably from the film maker and his mates.
Don't waste your time.
I enjoyed Marc Bannermans performance but thats just about where the enjoyment ended. Story wasn't great, acting was questionable, effects were poor.
More like a wet midweek episode of Line of Duty than a movie, some parts were so unbelievable that I actually wondered if this was supposed to be a dark comedy!
Watch if you've got nothing better to do.
I hope Bannerman gets some more (better) job offers off the back of this
Possibly the worst film I've ever seen, I say possibly as there must be worse I just can't think of one right now.
Let's start with the positive yep it's only one. Marc Bannerman was excellent, and considering I've seen more of this man incidentally on the street than on any screens in the last ten years I was surprised. Believable, didn't over do the tough guy routine a genuinely solid and enjoyable performance.
As for the rest, awful seriously absolutely awful. Wooden acting, ludicrous wardrobe decisions, even the sets made no sense. What police officer carries out interviews with a pen pot in reach of possibly dangerous suspects?
The dialogue was bordering on comical, the "story" about as engaging as watching ice melt if it wasn't for Bannerman occasionally popping in with some talent I wouldn't have got through it.
Save some time watch adverts you'll get more out of it
Is this one of the worst films I've ever seen, or am I missing the point? Firstly the acting is atrocious, more wooden than a carpenters workshop, however, Bannerman is ok. The sound is bad, even with the over the top cockney vernacular, it's very hard to tell what anyone's saying. The landscape shots are ok, they seemed to have spent more time and money on these than the acting. The dialogue is like something out of a cartoon. I liked the sequencing very much. But all in all it was awful. The killer had the best deal, never saying a word. And the ending, my mouth was wide open, not through shock and horror, but shear disbelief!!
I spent most of the film threatening to turn it off, but didn't either from a morbid fascination, or the farcical hope that it was going to turn into a musical.
Still confused!!!
I spent most of the film threatening to turn it off, but didn't either from a morbid fascination, or the farcical hope that it was going to turn into a musical.
Still confused!!!
Le saviez-vous
- AnecdotesThe actual production shoot was 8 days and featured a talking cast of 30 with 15 different location set-ups.
Meilleurs choix
Connectez-vous pour évaluer et suivre la liste de favoris afin de recevoir des recommandations personnalisées
Détails
- Durée1 heure 24 minutes
- Couleur
- Mixage
- Rapport de forme
- 2.35 : 1
Contribuer à cette page
Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant