Viking Blood

I watched the movie which lasted almost 2 hours and I was curious enough to check it's ratings. By the time I read the 10/10 rating that 1-2 people reviewed with, I was kinda confused whether or not we watched the same movie. It was a bad movie, I feel like I wasted my time. There was nothing impressive to it. Some of the actors were decent, the rest of them felt like they were paying to actually be in the movie.

If you are up for an amateurish Viking flick with decent norse theme, this is the movie for you. When the lone hero does his thing some other dudes tries to do theirs. Costumes is decent (armour not so much though It would work in a reenactment society wich it probably origins from). The story is slow, built by a slow storyteller and he has a hard time convincing me to listen. The actors are quite good but the obviously lack directions. Music and sound is decent, but the dubbing has its flaws. I would only recomend this movie to someone who are binging Viking movies. Otherwise, walk away!

Seems like a pretty amateur effort, but the actors take it seriously and I enjoyed it. Sort of a Viking era Western. Some of the other reviewers are right in that the editing is terrible. Has lots of other flaws but it has a certain charm that you only find in independent flicks.

It is a meandering series of half squirts at a coherent plot. The big bad Earl has 10 men plus his wife and himself that the goody takes down. The good thing about it is it ends.

Fist full of Dollars was the original, this is a weak attempt to use that storyline and make a Viking version. Acting 7/10, Plot 2/10 unoriginal, Overall 5/10.