Ajouter une intrigue dans votre langueForced into early retirement, Felix Greystone falls in love with an augmented reality companion, to the detriment of his relationship with his wife and daughter.Forced into early retirement, Felix Greystone falls in love with an augmented reality companion, to the detriment of his relationship with his wife and daughter.Forced into early retirement, Felix Greystone falls in love with an augmented reality companion, to the detriment of his relationship with his wife and daughter.
- Réalisation
- Scénario
- Casting principal
- Récompenses
- 3 victoires et 2 nominations au total
Steve M. Robertson
- Ben
- (as Steven M. Robertson)
Avis à la une
Promising concept but unfortunately the only worthwhile actor is Richard Kind. The remainder of the cast is just wooden and the stark contrast is hard to ignore.
This is a pretty good movie. It has a science fiction element obviously, but once you're past that, everything is completely believable as good science fiction ought to be. The aging man is sent into retirement and finds himself in a stale and lifeless situation. Thus, his retirement gift has particular relevance to him given his damaged ego, low self-esteem, and monotonous marriage. The gift of course is the glasses which provide a life-like companion programmed with AI to tend perfectly to the needs and whims of the wearer. It's an interesting premise that reminds me somewhat of "Her" which deals with similar subject matter. But this movie isn't just a cheap copy of "Her" as it has a fresh take on matters. The AI character is played by Christen Harper, who is absolutely gorgeous in this. I'd watch the movie just for her, and in a way you're sharing the main characters experience of interacting with her. It's completely relatable the man needs a break from his bossy and overbearing wife and finds refuge in the beautiful companion. There are a few week points to the movie - it's fairly predictable, and the pacing feels a bit slow. And without going into specifics, the ending isn't really satisfying. That aside, it's definitely worth watching and the IMDB rating should be a bit higher in my opinion.
I don't think it's a terrible movie like some of these reviews but but feels like a low budget version of Spike Jonze's Her but not as inspired or thought provoking.
I think the suspense and originality of the movie provides enough for it to be higher rated than it is
I feel like Richard Kind is one of those actors who is just consistently underappreciated, or maybe even underestimated, even for as ubiquitous as he often is. He's wonderfully versatile as a character actor, and at that more than capable as a lead, too. Maybe I'm projecting, and I don't mean to sound like I'm in any way undervaluing his co-stars, but I also feel like the warm ease of his acting also helps to brings out the best in those with whom he shares the screen. Indeed, though Kind is the star here, Susan Blackwell, Christen Harper, Simone Policano, and others in smaller parts all shine as they play off the dynamics afforded in scenes together, and off of how their characters are thusly informed. And with that, it's safe to say that we've seen other stories like 'Auggie' before, tales that have played with similar notions. That doesn't mean that a new variation can't be worthwhile on its own merits, and as filmmaker Matt Kane and co-writer Marc Underhill craft what is seemingly their first full-length feature, I believe they've also whipped up something just meaningfully different enough in its approach to be quite deserving. This may not be wholly essential, but it's a well made and quietly satisfying drama.
One might easily imagine how with a slight adjustment the screenplay could have turned into more severe psychological territory, or perhaps become a thriller. As it is the picture is softly engrossing as the story of a recently retired man who finds revitalization from a source fraught with uncomfortable ramifications. Familiar and commendable themes are presented in a way that nonetheless feels fresh, and maybe particularly relevant in our ever-changing technological landscape. All told the writing is perhaps relatively uncomplicated and straightforward in every regard; there are no major surprises here except maybe in the last minutes, nor any major spark to stir deep investment. Yet characters, dialogue, scenes, and the narrative at large are written well, real and believable if light compared to what we often expect from movies. 'Auggie' is all that it needs to be to lock in our engagement and entertain. Factor in Kane's capable direction, and fine contributions from all those behind the scenes, and this is both made and written well.
Enjoyable as the story is, still it's the acting that stands out most. Save for an especially striking beat in the last minutes as suggested, there's nothing about this that specifically leaps out to grab our attention; strong as it is, it's not intensely absorbing. Even with a slightly downbeat tone, this is more the type of film that's a pleasant view for a relaxing night in, with just enough substance for us to ponder the ins and outs of the scenario and the plot as it unfolds. If my words in any way seem noncommittal or unbothered, take this as a reflection of how 'Auggie' presents itself, subdued and uninvolved. This may not be a title that appeals as much to those seeking something more immediately gripping, but if you're looking for a solid drama that doesn't require utmost active concentration, thanks above all to the writing and the cast this is well worth checking out.
One might easily imagine how with a slight adjustment the screenplay could have turned into more severe psychological territory, or perhaps become a thriller. As it is the picture is softly engrossing as the story of a recently retired man who finds revitalization from a source fraught with uncomfortable ramifications. Familiar and commendable themes are presented in a way that nonetheless feels fresh, and maybe particularly relevant in our ever-changing technological landscape. All told the writing is perhaps relatively uncomplicated and straightforward in every regard; there are no major surprises here except maybe in the last minutes, nor any major spark to stir deep investment. Yet characters, dialogue, scenes, and the narrative at large are written well, real and believable if light compared to what we often expect from movies. 'Auggie' is all that it needs to be to lock in our engagement and entertain. Factor in Kane's capable direction, and fine contributions from all those behind the scenes, and this is both made and written well.
Enjoyable as the story is, still it's the acting that stands out most. Save for an especially striking beat in the last minutes as suggested, there's nothing about this that specifically leaps out to grab our attention; strong as it is, it's not intensely absorbing. Even with a slightly downbeat tone, this is more the type of film that's a pleasant view for a relaxing night in, with just enough substance for us to ponder the ins and outs of the scenario and the plot as it unfolds. If my words in any way seem noncommittal or unbothered, take this as a reflection of how 'Auggie' presents itself, subdued and uninvolved. This may not be a title that appeals as much to those seeking something more immediately gripping, but if you're looking for a solid drama that doesn't require utmost active concentration, thanks above all to the writing and the cast this is well worth checking out.
Le saviez-vous
Meilleurs choix
Connectez-vous pour évaluer et suivre la liste de favoris afin de recevoir des recommandations personnalisées
- How long is Auggie?Alimenté par Alexa
Détails
- Date de sortie
- Pays d’origine
- Site officiel
- Langue
- Aussi connu sous le nom de
- Огги
- Lieux de tournage
- Fairfield, Connecticut, États-Unis(Shot entirely on location)
- Sociétés de production
- Voir plus de crédits d'entreprise sur IMDbPro
- Durée1 heure 21 minutes
- Couleur
- Rapport de forme
- 2.39:1
Contribuer à cette page
Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant