In the Cloud

... for the nice aerial shots of "London", and then it's all downhill from there as an inane plot kicks in, executed by awful writing, acting, and most of all, directon and cinematography: 5-second shots with almost constant camera movement within the shots will make most viewers seasick within 15 minutes. No hope of a rescue by interesting plot twists, however, as it's entirely predictable to the end. Amateur hour film-making at its worst.

Out of three reviews, two of them are gushing 10-star from people who only signed up to IMDB a week or two ago and have no activity other than leaving those reviews. Don't trust them.

Great idea, great premise good progression on a tech Sci Fi theory that is looking more and more plausible every day. It holds your attention, then it ends......badly. Why go through with the whole story progression when the end doesn't justify, well, the means? What was the conclusion? The answer was that there wasn't any. If you like tech for its own sake, and a story that forgets to end itself, then this is for you. The only conclusion I can draw here, is that they are making a sequel or a series. But rest assured, this audience member won't bight on watching the sequel. What is it with these low budget producers and their reach that exceeds a grasp ego thats a million light years away from reality? Great acting from Gabriel Byrne and the others was wasted on this thing.

I saw on tv. Maybe the history is not the most original, but has some moments and a mix of interesting elements. It's not a movie for a 4/10 maybe near a 6 for normal people, 7 for teenagers and a 5 - 5.5 for sci-fi fans.

A typical C-grade amateur production with cheap props and a story told over many times. This is very low budget. Acting, directing and writing is very novice.