Nick et Janine vivent dans le bonheur conjugal jusqu'à ce que l'ex-mari de Janine tente de les séparer. Alors que les souvenirs de Nick disparaissent, il doit décider ce qu'il est prêt à sac... Tout lireNick et Janine vivent dans le bonheur conjugal jusqu'à ce que l'ex-mari de Janine tente de les séparer. Alors que les souvenirs de Nick disparaissent, il doit décider ce qu'il est prêt à sacrifier pour conserver tout ce qu'il aime.Nick et Janine vivent dans le bonheur conjugal jusqu'à ce que l'ex-mari de Janine tente de les séparer. Alors que les souvenirs de Nick disparaissent, il doit décider ce qu'il est prêt à sacrifier pour conserver tout ce qu'il aime.
- Réalisation
- Scénario
- Casting principal
- Elliot
- (as Charles Singh)
- Ryder
- (as Natalie D'Amico)
- Hekima
- (voix)
Avis à la une
The film isn't really about time travel. It's never really explained how it works or how people have come to just accept their lives regularly being altered by people messing around in the past.
This is all love story and if people can still be in love if they don't remember each other.
It's a bit slow and pretentious in places. I almost gave up after 5 mins. When I got to the end it felt more like achievement than satisfaction at a good film.
It really felt like it could have been much better done. It's hard to really care about the characters so you feel cold against what is happening instead of being drawn in and involved. It should be a film you discuss about after but it's just lacking in something.
It's worth a watch but it just really feels like it should have been a far bigger and better film. A waste as it's well acted and it's believable but not well executed.
I liked the line "every love story changes the life lines of many people". This was the idea of the movie. It's unsettling. I also prefer to believe love is unique for everyone. That we all have a soul mate. But we may as well have more than one. Maybe one is more optimal than the other, maybe one is "a bigger love", maybe not. I don't know. Nobody knows. But we all know there is life after love and that life sometimes continues with another love.
So I think this is what the movie is exploting. Is it a good sci fi? Of course not. But it's a good love story. It's well executed. I like that it's slow and gentle. It has its own style and proper pace. I scrolled some of the slower moments, but as a whole, I think it's a good thing to watch. It poses interesting questions. The actors are good. The music is good. I like it. Maybe it's not for everyone, but to me, it has its charm.
Le saviez-vous
- AnecdotesThe short story by Robert Silverberg that this movie is based on was first published in the June 1983 issue of Playboy. Silverberg had previously published a collection of ten short stories under the same title in 1966, and decided to re-use the title for this story.
- Citations
Zoe Mikkelsen: What if you go back and change your past but you end up with no future?
- Crédits fousIn keeping with one of the film's mantras, that "Love is formed in a circle", each of the main end credits has a letter "O" which persists while the other letters fade out.
- Bandes originalesIn the Beginning
Written by Jeremy Steig
Meilleurs choix
- How long is Needle in a Timestack?Alimenté par Alexa
Détails
- Date de sortie
- Pays d’origine
- Site officiel
- Langues
- Aussi connu sous le nom de
- Une aiguille dans une botte de temps
- Lieux de tournage
- Sociétés de production
- Voir plus de crédits d'entreprise sur IMDbPro
- Durée
- 1h 51min(111 min)
- Couleur