NOTE IMDb
5,6/10
1,8 k
MA NOTE
Une romance de conte de fées prend une tournure inattendue lorsque Mark découvre que sa belle future épouse, Connie, a en fait comploté contre lui.Une romance de conte de fées prend une tournure inattendue lorsque Mark découvre que sa belle future épouse, Connie, a en fait comploté contre lui.Une romance de conte de fées prend une tournure inattendue lorsque Mark découvre que sa belle future épouse, Connie, a en fait comploté contre lui.
- Réalisation
- Scénario
- Casting principal
Ed Speleers
- Johnny
- (as Edward Speleers)
Charley McDougall
- John Doe
- (as Charley Mcdougall)
Ruth Clarson
- Pub Customer
- (as Ruth Horrocks)
Avis à la une
Production quality isn't hollywood level, but suprisingly well edited and acted out. Very enjoyable to watch and has real laughs in it. wouldn't mind watching it again.
Really enjoyed this one. Wasn't expecting much because I didn't know any of the actors but, boy, the dialogues are brilliant. Watched with my gf and we had a great time. Definitely a feel good movie. Highly recommended.
Not to be confused with the michael fox one from 1993. Growng up, mark (robert kazinsky) has always admired connie (samantha barks) from afar. So when she makes moves on him as an adult, he proposes right away. The viewers can see that she's just a gold digger. Mark's housemate can see it. But will mark figure it out in time? It gets a little painful to watch when they are being mean to each other, but oh well. The minister steals the show, with his fussing and cussing. Fun little adventure. On the roku channel. Directed by mark murphy.
Wasn't sure with the movie didn't think I would like it but it turned out to be a really funny movie a little sad at times shed a tear or two but otherwise funny movie
First of all let it be perfectly clear that the reviewers that scored this movie with a perfect ten are fake reviewers. They all have just one review so it's pretty obvious somebody made them writing this as a favor. Any normal human being could see this movie is just a stinker. The story is very predictable but most of all very boring and annoying. It's one of those movies you wonder why they made it. Maybe with better actors it could go from really bad (what it is now) to mediocre at best. But the major problem are the actors, they are just bad. Robert Kazinsky (first time I saw the bloke if I have to be honest) is cringing to watch. When my wife told me he was in EastEnders I have to admit I was not surprised at all, as all failures of actors end up in sleezy soap series. The other 'main' character played by Samantha Barks looks also everything but professional. This movie is supposed to be a comedy but I didn't laugh once, and I can assure you there is nothing wrong with my sense of humor. And why do they need such an absurd title? The Revenger: An Unromantic Comedy or For Love Or Money, it doesn't matter which one, they are both stupid titles for a boring movie. Avoid at all costs.
Le saviez-vous
- AnecdotesCarolyn Jones' final film.
Meilleurs choix
Connectez-vous pour évaluer et suivre la liste de favoris afin de recevoir des recommandations personnalisées
- How long is For Love or Money?Alimenté par Alexa
Détails
- Durée
- 1h 35min(95 min)
- Couleur
Contribuer à cette page
Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant