Funhouse
- 2019
- 1h 46min
Lorsque huit célébrités du monde entier sont invitées à participer à une émission de téléréalité en ligne, elles se rendent vite compte qu'elles jouent pour leur vie, car ceux qui ont été ex... Tout lireLorsque huit célébrités du monde entier sont invitées à participer à une émission de téléréalité en ligne, elles se rendent vite compte qu'elles jouent pour leur vie, car ceux qui ont été exclus subissent des conséquences horribles.Lorsque huit célébrités du monde entier sont invitées à participer à une émission de téléréalité en ligne, elles se rendent vite compte qu'elles jouent pour leur vie, car ceux qui ont été exclus subissent des conséquences horribles.
- Réalisation
- Scénario
- Casting principal
- Récompenses
- 1 victoire au total
- Vapula
- (as Scotty Schnurr Mac)
- …
Avis à la une
Plot Overview The movie revolves around a group of international celebrities-each known for their moment of fame-who are invited to participate in a reality TV show called *Funhouse*. The catch? It's a deadly competition where the contestants must play sadistic games, and the loser of each round is brutally executed, live-streamed for the morbid entertainment of a worldwide audience. The last one standing wins a massive cash prize, but they must first survive the cruelty orchestrated by a puppet master behind the scenes.
Direction and Cinematography Jason William Lee's direction effectively captures the sleazy and exploitative tone that reflects the film's commentary on media and reality TV. The visual style is slick, with a digital sheen that complements the hyper-modern, almost dystopian setting of a reality show. However, the direction sometimes falters, leaning heavily into the more predictable tropes of modern horror, such as shock value gore and shallow characterizations.
The cinematography, handled by Shawn Seifert, is sharp and appropriately claustrophobic, heightening the tension in confined spaces. There are some standout moments of visual storytelling, such as the contrast between the glitzy exterior of the show and the brutal reality lurking beneath the surface. This effectively mirrors the way reality TV glamorizes human suffering. However, as visually competent as the film is, it lacks a distinctive or innovative style that might have elevated the experience beyond its predictable structure.
Acting and Characters The cast does a decent job with the material, but the characters themselves are thinly drawn. Each contestant is a stereotypical caricature of a celebrity archetype: a fallen pop star, a controversial YouTuber, and so on. While this is a deliberate choice to emphasize the satirical nature of the film, it ends up making it difficult to truly care about any of them. Their fates feel more like fodder for the film's violence than individuals with meaningful arcs.
As the body count rises, so does the sense of detachment from their outcomes.
Themes and Social Commentary Where *Funhouse* shines is in its thematic exploration of society's obsession with fame, violence, and desensitization to suffering. The film critiques the voyeuristic nature of reality TV, the hunger for sensationalism, and the increasing normalization of cruelty in digital spaces. These ideas are highly relevant in today's media landscape, where reality shows push boundaries, and social media thrives on public humiliation and outrage.
Gore and Horror Elements For fans of the horror genre, particularly those who enjoy survival horror and gore, *Funhouse* delivers on its promise of shocking violence. The deaths are creative in their brutality, and the tension builds effectively in some of the elimination sequences. However, the film relies too heavily on these moments to sustain interest, which can make the overall experience feel repetitive.
Conclusion *Funhouse* is a competent but flawed horror film that offers a scathing, if somewhat shallow, critique of media consumption and the dark side of reality television. While its thematic ambitions are clear, the execution often feels derivative and lacks the nuance to fully engage its audience beyond surface-level thrills. For those intrigued by the concept of a twisted, *Black Mirror*-esque game show, it provides some gruesome entertainment, but it ultimately fails to break new ground in the horror genre.
The damnation of meaningless celeb status is constantly waved in the audiences face which doesn't help the characters feel relatable, but perhaps thats the point? Non of these feelings are aided by the tepid script and questionable acting either, which led me into a sort of numb coma halfway through the film as I watched fictional instagram people being killed one by one and feeling nothing.
I recognise and respect that the film had a smaller budget and lesser known cast than most mainstream releases and aesthetically it was fairly pleasing and some scenes hit the mark and just about kept my interest afloat despite my often deflating attention. However I still ended the film feeling beaten down by the film's lacking apsects and especially the ending monologue delivered by the villain (AKA poundland moriarty) was so on the nose even Christopher 'headstone'Gerard would have been K.O'ed by it.
We get it, Instagram is bad, you didn't need to make a movie to tell us.
Turn off the brain, and just enjoy it.
Le saviez-vous
- AnecdotesIn demonology, Furcas is a Knight of Hell and rules 20 legions of demons.
- GaffesWhen Ula loses voting contest, the amount of all players is more than100%, actually it is 134%.
- Citations
James 'Headstone' Malone: The bold will die, as will the strong. As legends, we go on.
- ConnexionsReferences The Friendly Ghost (1945)
Meilleurs choix
Détails
- Date de sortie
- Pays d’origine
- Site officiel
- Langues
- Aussi connu sous le nom de
- 殺戮實境秀
- Lieux de tournage
- Sociétés de production
- Voir plus de crédits d'entreprise sur IMDbPro
Box-office
- Montant brut aux États-Unis et au Canada
- 507 $US
- Week-end de sortie aux États-Unis et au Canada
- 251 $US
- 30 mai 2021
- Montant brut mondial
- 110 571 $US
- Durée1 heure 46 minutes
- Couleur
- Rapport de forme
- 2:1