NOTE IMDb
3,6/10
1,2 k
MA NOTE
Une tempête s'annonce. Personne n'a pu la prédire, personne ne peut la mesurer. Personne ne peut la mesurer. Une famille doit maintenant y survivre. Vous ne pouvez pas rentrer par le froid.Une tempête s'annonce. Personne n'a pu la prédire, personne ne peut la mesurer. Personne ne peut la mesurer. Une famille doit maintenant y survivre. Vous ne pouvez pas rentrer par le froid.Une tempête s'annonce. Personne n'a pu la prédire, personne ne peut la mesurer. Personne ne peut la mesurer. Une famille doit maintenant y survivre. Vous ne pouvez pas rentrer par le froid.
- Réalisation
- Scénario
- Casting principal
- Récompenses
- 1 victoire au total
Lauren K. Robek
- Candace Summers
- (as Kirsten Robek)
Avis à la une
The movie doesn't make any sense from beginning to end. The script is crazy bad. At the beginning there was a little bit of action. But every single thing was so obvious. I have to say I like the general idea of the movie I mean that's why I bought it. But the execution was really sad... I really think with a slightly better script and little bit more scientific backup the movie could be a average movie. And also I have to say the visual effects where incredibly bad and unfortunately there were too many of them... also that the ice storm has a sound like a monster in a horror movie I mean come on it's a storm not a monster.
But I have to say are probably worse movies out there so I won't give this movie a 1 Star Review rather a 3 star one.
But I have to say are probably worse movies out there so I won't give this movie a 1 Star Review rather a 3 star one.
Not much to say about this one, Family holiday gets ruined by mini ice age caused by manmade global warming that was predicted by scientist who has a petty party and hides in the woods. We have the standard family with an annoying teenager with Daddy issues that you get in most family holiday / disaster movies, you know the one, who you hope gets chopped quickly. The plot is so close to day after tomorrow that I'm surprised the makers haven't been in court yet. All good predictable end of the world stuff, improved by the use of locations with real snow, and some not too bad CGI. Shame they couldn't find an original script though.
As a Canadian the Hollywood idea of cold is so stupid. People with their coat opened, no gloves, mittens, no snow pants, or even a scarf over their face. And what about their feet?
Plus the cold weather can brake the windows !!!
Plus the cold weather can brake the windows !!!
Yes, I wanted to save as many as I can ... from watching this absolute stinker. So if you've seen "The Day After Tomorrow" you know the general deal. There's really only one difference between the two movies - Tomorrow doesn't want to make you gouge your eyes out with an ice pick.
Having a science background, I am mildly entertained when concepts follow the general laws of physics. Luckily I didn't have to worry here because there was no science to evaluate as nothing made sense. Again and again the laws were broken with clear abandonment. It might have been helpful to have this improve the story, develop a character or idea, but alas no
I don't want to see any of the actors again as none of them performed with any degree of conviction, except maybe the paycheck. I rather pity any of the cast that took shares in the movie in lieu of payment - unlikely they'd have got bus fare.
To make it fair, I gave 1 star for committing this to celluloid, probably against the advice of family, friends and anyone who actually read the script before committing to star in it, and another star for the cast surviving to the end of the movie with straight faces. I've seen better acting in commercials.
Having a science background, I am mildly entertained when concepts follow the general laws of physics. Luckily I didn't have to worry here because there was no science to evaluate as nothing made sense. Again and again the laws were broken with clear abandonment. It might have been helpful to have this improve the story, develop a character or idea, but alas no
I don't want to see any of the actors again as none of them performed with any degree of conviction, except maybe the paycheck. I rather pity any of the cast that took shares in the movie in lieu of payment - unlikely they'd have got bus fare.
To make it fair, I gave 1 star for committing this to celluloid, probably against the advice of family, friends and anyone who actually read the script before committing to star in it, and another star for the cast surviving to the end of the movie with straight faces. I've seen better acting in commercials.
.... and that it is what it's like going through when watching this.
I know we are currently suffering extremes of weather, which the producers of this film are exploiting, but this is a bit over the top, the "special effects" are not so special, they keep repeating a satellite image of a white cloud with a hole in it, exactly the same - no movement, repeating it several times throughout the film, one scene involves the main hero burying himself in a snow hole to survive being frozen, with a candle which burns the oxygen in the hole uo, so either he should have frozen to death or died of lack of oxygen, but he was not even that cold when he came out.
The acting is poor, the dialogue terrible, the emotional scenes look put on, which of course they are (real actors make the emotional scenes look real), continuity is not good, scenes where there are frozen people show the area frost free, it would take a while to defrost! And despite recently been frozen, the roads have wet puddles, not ice!
The music is poor, and sound effects are annoying.
I am looking for the good points, maybe the story is good, but the screenplay has ruined it.
Poor, interesting, but poor. Like a disaster movie from the 70's but without star actors.
I know we are currently suffering extremes of weather, which the producers of this film are exploiting, but this is a bit over the top, the "special effects" are not so special, they keep repeating a satellite image of a white cloud with a hole in it, exactly the same - no movement, repeating it several times throughout the film, one scene involves the main hero burying himself in a snow hole to survive being frozen, with a candle which burns the oxygen in the hole uo, so either he should have frozen to death or died of lack of oxygen, but he was not even that cold when he came out.
The acting is poor, the dialogue terrible, the emotional scenes look put on, which of course they are (real actors make the emotional scenes look real), continuity is not good, scenes where there are frozen people show the area frost free, it would take a while to defrost! And despite recently been frozen, the roads have wet puddles, not ice!
The music is poor, and sound effects are annoying.
I am looking for the good points, maybe the story is good, but the screenplay has ruined it.
Poor, interesting, but poor. Like a disaster movie from the 70's but without star actors.
Le saviez-vous
- AnecdotesThis is set in Alaska USA, but at 15:55 the cyclists pass a sign showing Pemberton Health Centre. The Canadian spelling of "Center" tells us where the outside locations were filmed.
Meilleurs choix
Connectez-vous pour évaluer et suivre la liste de favoris afin de recevoir des recommandations personnalisées
- How long is Cold Zone?Alimenté par Alexa
Détails
- Date de sortie
- Pays d’origine
- Site officiel
- Langue
- Aussi connu sous le nom de
- Cold Zone
- Lieux de tournage
- Pemberton British Columbia, Canada(final credits page)
- Société de production
- Voir plus de crédits d'entreprise sur IMDbPro
- Durée
- 1h 25min(85 min)
- Couleur
- Rapport de forme
- 1.78 : 1
Contribuer à cette page
Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant