Ask for Jane

This was a nice attempt to elaborate on the significance of an absurdly persisting issue in today's world. It was clearly a low budget film but the perspective, story, and the message allow you to look beyond the shortcomings.

I first saw this film at the Athens Film Fest in NY this spring in a packed theatre where it was enthusiastically received. The praise was well deserved. The history of the Jane Collective in Chicago in the late 60s was both enlightening- I had never heard of it- and unfortunately timely (although the film was produced before the SCOTUS threat to Roe v. Wade was quite as pronounced). Everyone should see this film - it is a solid reminder of the actual dangers and fear that women faced before pro-choice legislation, which is rarely showcased.

As several reviewers pointed out, the small budget limited the cinematography to mainly right/small shots- but rather than this being a distraction, I found that this created a more intimate relationship with the characters- much like a play. The story was- and should be- the focus here, and it is an important one.

It's a shame that the issue of abortion is still one that plagues the political dialogue. With the recent law passed in Alabama, we are one step closer to the nightmarish implications women faced in pre-Roe v. Wade America, where obtaining an abortion was difficult, painful, and often impossible. The Jane Collective, the basis for "Ask for Jane", was one of the groups who defied the laws, helping women obtain safe abortions and providing a support network. Unfortunately, the brave efforts of these women has not received the film adaptation they deserved in "Ask for Jane".

For starters, the main thing holding this film back is it's budget. According to what I can find online, the film had a budget of $250,000. Even when considering that shoestring budget, this film is incredibly lacking. Films like "Thunder Road" (with a budget of $200,000) and "Upstream Color" ($50,000) look leagues better than "Ask for Jane". Perhaps that is because, unlike those other films (or most low-budget films, for that matter), "Ask for Jane" is a period film, set in the late 60s/early 70s in Chicago. In my initial viewing, I wasn't aware of the exact budget, but began to notice that 90% of the scenes were shot indoors, and the framing of the few outdoor scenes was very tight and claustrophobic. I soon realized that this is because if the shots were any wider, we'd catch the modern stores and cars they were walking past. I will give the filmmakers credit that I wasn't able to catch any Starbucks or SUVs in the background. However, with limited resources, a film should be able to trick it's viewers into not seeing it's shortcomings. This film fails in that respect, with the cheap synthetic costumes, hastily decorated starter apartments, and all cars or other expensive spectacle occurring offscreen (save for one powder-blue Oldsmobile the film was able to secure).

Even if the budget was sufficient for this film, there were still other issues to overcome. A rushed feel, a lack of coverage, and a script that has characters randomly being introduced and dropped until almost the very end of the 108-minute film kill the pacing of the project.

The tone of the film is also over the place. Abortion is probably one of the most difficult subjects to tackle in storytelling, and "Ask for Jane" can't decide what tone it wants to take. In some scenes, abortion is treated with solemn urgency. In others, it's treated with blase flippancy ("My parents are really religious", one pregnant character cries. "So just get an abortion", says her roommate, with the significance of telling her to run to the supermarket to get milk.) In one very strange moment in a montage, abortion is played for comedy, when a frazzled mother of four chokes out "I CAN'T have another."

For the most part, the performances were fine. The main seven women portrayed their roles with conviction, and the peripheral characters fulfilled their purposes. The only weak link was main character Rose's fiance, who woodenly leaves her after her involvement in The Jane Collective would potentially ruin his chances of running for "office" (what office or political platform he takes, the movie doesn't seem to really care about). His main problem is that he doesn't seem convincingly upset about Rose's part-time job as an abortionist, so his decision to leave her doesn't make any sense.

The biggest shame of "Ask for Jane" is that I wish a better film would be made about The Jane Collective. This group helped thousands of women reclaim their lives and their bodily autonomy. However, the filmmakers seem to be mistaken that historical importance is a substitute for competent production design, nuanced direction, or defined characters.

This film takes you back to 1969 to remind you what life was like in the pre roe days. But it's more than that. How do some college women become abortion providers? How do you find a Doctor willing to go to jail? How do you let women know that you have a service, without going afoul of the police? Exactly how condescending were doctors to women back then? This film deftly interweaves multiple stories to give a full picture. And it has a great ensemble cast.

A different movie and was really worth watching. I liked sets and designs.