Julian Reed et Barbara Sullivan créent un bébé en utilisant l'ancien ADN d'un corps de Néandertal. William doit apprendre à exister dans un monde où il est le seul homme de Néandertal de la ... Tout lireJulian Reed et Barbara Sullivan créent un bébé en utilisant l'ancien ADN d'un corps de Néandertal. William doit apprendre à exister dans un monde où il est le seul homme de Néandertal de la planète.Julian Reed et Barbara Sullivan créent un bébé en utilisant l'ancien ADN d'un corps de Néandertal. William doit apprendre à exister dans un monde où il est le seul homme de Néandertal de la planète.
- Réalisation
- Scénario
- Casting principal
- Récompenses
- 2 victoires et 4 nominations au total
Avis à la une
A very interesting movie..
I'm not much into anthropology. But if does touch some anthropological discussions in a very subtle but thought provoking way.
The director laid out the premise very well but then had to squeeze the rest with a 100 minute time limitation in mind while not forgetting to add some relational issues into the mix.
As for the ending, it would have probably be different if the story was set in any other country than US. Can you imagine why??
The initial premise isn't too bad. There are some problems. For example when the science on recovering and using A(ancient)-DNA gets better, you aren't going to see these types of experiments in North America, or Europe as in both surveys show a very large amount of resistance. But rather in east Asia where the surveys show a lot more borad public acceptance of human DNA experimentation.
There is also an issue with the way the Neanderthal's boy's intelligence is dealt with. We know that on broad averages individuals and population groups with more Neanderthal DNA input have better spacial intelligence and comprehension of metaphor and symbol -- not less. In that sense this film inverts the science. Neaderthal most likely extinction was caused by competition and with Homo Sapiens with Homo Sapiens key advantages being in long, medium and short burst running speed and a couple of other attributes, including greater sexual dimporphism, that led to better specialization.
but those are not the main problems with this film. The main problem is shoehorning an interesting science fiction piece with a tired melodrama of a kid being different, wishing they were not, and then acceptance. it makes this film a hallmark card/lifetime channel trope that isn't even above average in that field.
There is also an issue with the way the Neanderthal's boy's intelligence is dealt with. We know that on broad averages individuals and population groups with more Neanderthal DNA input have better spacial intelligence and comprehension of metaphor and symbol -- not less. In that sense this film inverts the science. Neaderthal most likely extinction was caused by competition and with Homo Sapiens with Homo Sapiens key advantages being in long, medium and short burst running speed and a couple of other attributes, including greater sexual dimporphism, that led to better specialization.
but those are not the main problems with this film. The main problem is shoehorning an interesting science fiction piece with a tired melodrama of a kid being different, wishing they were not, and then acceptance. it makes this film a hallmark card/lifetime channel trope that isn't even above average in that field.
Very short review here. This story was building up to have some kind of an amazing conclusion and then it's like the writer just ran out of money or time and was told that the story needs to end by noon today, so it was rushed. Very big let down for having invested my time.
Interesting idea but it wasn't really well done, far too much of everyday life was simply left out like social media etc etc.
It has a really meh ending to boot. I have to wonder if the people writing these stupid endings think it's fun, or unique from the myriad other movies with suck endings? Frankly it adds nothing but a negative star.
I think maybe the people that made this saw "Iceman 1984" one time too many.
It has a really meh ending to boot. I have to wonder if the people writing these stupid endings think it's fun, or unique from the myriad other movies with suck endings? Frankly it adds nothing but a negative star.
I think maybe the people that made this saw "Iceman 1984" one time too many.
Le saviez-vous
- AnecdotesThe film explores themes of ethics, human nature, the definition of humanity, and the impact of scientific advancements.
Meilleurs choix
Connectez-vous pour évaluer et suivre la liste de favoris afin de recevoir des recommandations personnalisées
- How long is William?Alimenté par Alexa
Détails
- Durée
- 1h 40min(100 min)
- Couleur
Contribuer à cette page
Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant