[go: up one dir, main page]

    Calendrier de sortiesLes 250 meilleurs filmsLes films les plus populairesRechercher des films par genreMeilleur box officeHoraires et billetsActualités du cinémaPleins feux sur le cinéma indien
    Ce qui est diffusé à la télévision et en streamingLes 250 meilleures sériesÉmissions de télévision les plus populairesParcourir les séries TV par genreActualités télévisées
    Que regarderLes dernières bandes-annoncesProgrammes IMDb OriginalChoix d’IMDbCoup de projecteur sur IMDbGuide de divertissement pour la famillePodcasts IMDb
    OscarsEmmysSan Diego Comic-ConSummer Watch GuideToronto Int'l Film FestivalSTARmeter AwardsAwards CentralFestivalsTous les événements
    Né aujourd'huiLes célébrités les plus populairesActualités des célébrités
    Centre d'aideZone des contributeursSondages
Pour les professionnels de l'industrie
  • Langue
  • Entièrement prise en charge
  • English (United States)
    Partiellement prise en charge
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Liste de favoris
Se connecter
  • Entièrement prise en charge
  • English (United States)
    Partiellement prise en charge
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Utiliser l'appli
Retour
  • Distribution et équipe technique
  • Avis des utilisateurs
IMDbPro
Hayflick Limit (2017)

Avis des utilisateurs

Hayflick Limit

2 commentaires
6/10

A mystery thriller with an original plot...

Several mysteries develop in this film: Who is Rosie (the protagonist played by Brittany Kragerud) and where did she come from? Why is her memory so spotty and why is she being so evasive? Why was she in that illicit medical lab and what were they doing to her in there? Why are those scientists so intent on recapturing her? And who can she trust?

All of these mysteries are eventually answered at the end of the film, with an unexpected twist. (Warning: The distribution company for this film put out a synopsis of this film which was full of spoilers and which revealed all of the major plot points including the surprise ending. If you like mysteries without spoilers, don't read anything about this film before you see it! -- except this review, of course:)

Production-wise, the cinematography was very good for a low-budget, independent film. Technically the DP handled both interior and exterior scenes well; and the angles, tone and editing were supportive of the what was happening in the story. The score was good with the exception of some upbeat rock music played at the end (and the beginning) which was completely out of place. This movie was not a happy-go-lucky romp through the park. It's a suspenseful, scary thriller with suspenseful orchestrated music throughout, so rock music doesn't fit. Also, this film doesn't have a happy ending (and can't have a happy ending for reasons I can't explain without spoilers), so putting in that upbeat rock music at the end was huge blunder by the filmmakers.

One note on the editing/script -- there was one very long scene in the middle of the film showing one of the support characters, the sheriff, sitting in his car doing nothing for what seemed like an eternity. I mean the guy just sat there motionless, no cuts, no changes in camera angle at all, nothing. I thought maybe my video stream had frozen or something. I have no idea why the filmmakers did that. It didn't add anything to the story or the character. Weird.

The acting from this unknown cast was really spotty. In the beginning the performances were okay, but there were some scenes in the middle of the film that were really awful. But there were some good performances too. Tom Isenberg, playing Joe the scientist/father, really gave a great performance as a creepy psycho. Kragerud also did well for a young unknown actress. Sonya Katarina Isenberg, who had a smaller part, also did a good job for a teenager. There was another actor who also had the same last name, Patricia Isenberg, and there were lots of duplicate last names in the relatively small cast/crew, so I think maybe these independent filmmakers may have just picked some of their friends/families to help produce this film -- I'm not sure because there's not that much online about the film, producers and cast. Some of them may be associated with another independent film, "Dad's in Heaven with Nixon" (2010) which was actually a documentary about autism.

There was only one black actor in this film with a speaking part, a woman (played by Sharron Shannon) who had a small part with five or six lines and only 16 seconds of screen time. The black woman -- who was holding a baby (played by Rupert Shannon) -- was depicted in a favorable manner and had a positive interaction with one of the supporting actors. (There was a black extra -- who I believe was played by David Shannon, Jr. -- on screen for about a second or two, a child who was not really noticeable in the scene.) It was a small cast, but it would have been better if one of the main characters had been played by a black actor so that black characters had more screen time. The sheriff, Ben, is a Native American man played by Clint Hughes, who I assume is Native American himself. (Hughes gave a mostly good performance with a couple of exceptions.)

There was one other minor issue I had with the film. The dialog and character of the main protagonist was portrayed exactly as you'd expect from a young Earth woman. I think the credibility of the character and the plot would have benefited if she would have "slipped up" a couple of times and maybe used some inaccordant phases. It would have given the audience more to chew on in this mystery.

Overall, the film was well produced for an independent film and the actors did a good job for an inexperienced cast (with a few glaring exceptions). The story was original and the dialog was mostly believable. And there was no racial bias or racial derision, which often occurs in traditional Hollywood-produced films. It's worth watching if you like suspense thrillers and original mystery stories (and you can tolerate some lousy acting in spots).

Advisory: Some violence (bludgeoning) but no gory scenes.

Rating: 6/10; (submitted August 25, 2020, 5:30 p.m. EDT)
  • ulisses_phoenix
  • 24 août 2020
  • Permalien
2/10

Now I see why I'm the first reviewer

First off, I almost NEVER give up on a movie Midway, no matter how what.

At 10-15 minutes in, we meet the protagonist. She escapes from her captor. NOTHING happens up to about the 45-minute mark, when it is revealed what any viewer would be suspecting. I watched another 10 minutes or so and that was all I could take.

I've literally seen better acting and better writing in a movie. I am not exaggerating. Stay away!
  • steveinillinois2006
  • 28 févr. 2020
  • Permalien

En savoir plus sur ce titre

Découvrir

Récemment consultés

Activez les cookies du navigateur pour utiliser cette fonctionnalité. En savoir plus
Obtenir l'application IMDb
Identifiez-vous pour accéder à davantage de ressourcesIdentifiez-vous pour accéder à davantage de ressources
Suivez IMDb sur les réseaux sociaux
Obtenir l'application IMDb
Pour Android et iOS
Obtenir l'application IMDb
  • Aide
  • Index du site
  • IMDbPro
  • Box Office Mojo
  • Licence de données IMDb
  • Salle de presse
  • Annonces
  • Emplois
  • Conditions d'utilisation
  • Politique de confidentialité
  • Your Ads Privacy Choices
IMDb, une société Amazon

© 1990-2025 by IMDb.com, Inc.