NOTE IMDb
4,8/10
6,4 k
MA NOTE
Ajouter une intrigue dans votre langueIn the 1950s in small-town Georgia, a pregnant young woman named Agatha seeks refuge in a convent.In the 1950s in small-town Georgia, a pregnant young woman named Agatha seeks refuge in a convent.In the 1950s in small-town Georgia, a pregnant young woman named Agatha seeks refuge in a convent.
- Réalisation
- Scénario
- Casting principal
- Récompenses
- 1 victoire au total
Marsha Fee Berger
- Sister Susan
- (as Marsha Berger)
Bobby C. King
- Strange Man
- (as Bobby King)
Rachael Gavrielli
- Veronica
- (as Rachael George)
Avis à la une
I don't even now why I gave this movie 2 stars, maybe for the colors? The movie is not enjoyable horror wise - just some demented people doing crazy things. Things that could be stopped but the main characters of the movie seem to be some brainless sheep.
There's some characters that were made to make you hate them and that's about it. There's no horror in this movie.
Darren Lynn Bousman has had some rough years as a director, yet his previous works, in my opinion, stand higher than this one.
"St. Agatha", as a horror, offers nothing new, original, amazing, extraordinary or even good. The writers responsible for the story and characters definitely do not deserve nor applause nor a subtle nod, maybe a little shaming. The story's fairly straight-forward, never builds up to anything unexpected, the suggested supernatural angle of the plot is not explored or explained much at all. The protagonist characters are traditionally dumb, the antagonist characters are sort of over-written, even annoying at some points. However, the acting did not bother me, given the variety of weakly written characters, the level of acting in "St. Agatha" is rather impressive.
Cinematography is decent, noticeably low-budget, but good enough to not annoy the eye of the viewer. There are a few decent, scattered scenes of violence & abuse - the short, more action-ey parts of the movie are at least average. All is accompanied by a soundtrack that's mostly noticeable only when the ominous, creepy choir voices join in. The pacing is pretty draggy, there's more lows than highs. If you don't have a strong principle of finishing whatever You've started watching, as I do, prepare for the risk of poor Agatha putting You to sleep.
"St. Agatha" is a painfully average, if not below, indie horror flick. Disappointing. My rating: 4/10.
"St. Agatha", as a horror, offers nothing new, original, amazing, extraordinary or even good. The writers responsible for the story and characters definitely do not deserve nor applause nor a subtle nod, maybe a little shaming. The story's fairly straight-forward, never builds up to anything unexpected, the suggested supernatural angle of the plot is not explored or explained much at all. The protagonist characters are traditionally dumb, the antagonist characters are sort of over-written, even annoying at some points. However, the acting did not bother me, given the variety of weakly written characters, the level of acting in "St. Agatha" is rather impressive.
Cinematography is decent, noticeably low-budget, but good enough to not annoy the eye of the viewer. There are a few decent, scattered scenes of violence & abuse - the short, more action-ey parts of the movie are at least average. All is accompanied by a soundtrack that's mostly noticeable only when the ominous, creepy choir voices join in. The pacing is pretty draggy, there's more lows than highs. If you don't have a strong principle of finishing whatever You've started watching, as I do, prepare for the risk of poor Agatha putting You to sleep.
"St. Agatha" is a painfully average, if not below, indie horror flick. Disappointing. My rating: 4/10.
Giving it 3 stars only because the acting was okay.... But the script and directing of it was absolutely horrendous.
It's one thing to give your screen characters the IQ's of a potato, but it's unforgivable to treat your audience as morons. Add to that a slow pacing only made even slower by numerous flashbacks.
It might have been saved by at least a good finale confrontation between the main protagonist and antagonist, but even that was omitted. Instead we were given a ridiculous ,unrealistic and almost laughable act at the end.
This movie isnt the worst but its far from good. the acting is actually quite good but the writing kinda sucks. there's plotholes and a whole lot of suspense building to the end but then we dont get a resolution. There's also some hints at there being a supernatural element but that never gets explored. Its not so much a horror film as a thriller or suspense perhaps. I wont rewatch it but its not a bad flick to put on while you do something else.
OK, so this isn't going to be a film for gore fans. It is more of a psychological thriller/horror than all out horror.
Even so, this film is well acted and produced with a solid story yo can become engrossed in.
Certainly worth a watch.
Even so, this film is well acted and produced with a solid story yo can become engrossed in.
Certainly worth a watch.
Le saviez-vous
- AnecdotesMost of the crew believed that the basement was haunted. The basement was actually an abandoned old morgue.
- GaffesWhen Mary/Agatha is going through Mother Superior's desk she happens upon a stack of money. At the top of the stack is a modern $100 bill with the enlarged face of Benjamin Franklin. These bills were not put into circulation until 1996, which is, at the very minimum 40 years after this film is said to have taken place.
Meilleurs choix
Connectez-vous pour évaluer et suivre la liste de favoris afin de recevoir des recommandations personnalisées
- How long is St. Agatha?Alimenté par Alexa
Détails
Box-office
- Montant brut mondial
- 1 468 454 $US
- Durée
- 1h 43min(103 min)
- Couleur
- Rapport de forme
- 2.39 : 1
Contribuer à cette page
Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant