Murder in the Woods

It's an average slasher/psycho flick that you will work out fairly quickly who, what and why. The acting is ok but patchy and .the cinematography about what you would expect from a slasher. OK for a lazy day.

At the moment this movie has 7 reviews. All of those 7 people have only reviewed this movie, and all of them have given it 10/10. Some of the usernames also bear resemblance to one another, and most of the accounts are brand new.

Make of that what you will. This isn't a 10/10 movie.

Music was garbage and forced in certain scenes... Only actor worth watching is the lead. the other actress just screams we gotta fet outta here like 10 times... Trejo is on film for 5 mins... Its sad because I love the lighting and area they shot... Could have been great if not for a shoddy script... terrible dialogue and horrible cringeworthy actors.

It's pretty much all I wanted it to be.

All the actors did good. Watching Catherine Toribio as Celeste was extra fun to me because of her mannerisms at times, which made me go, "What the?" in a way that I like. I like the song choices as well, which is not normal for my experience with these type of slasher flicks. I really like Soledad St. Hilaire as Nana. The last half of the third act, I found done quite well.

Ending kept me wondering. All in all, I really dig it!

José Julián Bad acting at its finest. BTW do all These young actors go to the same acting school that teaches " no, no ,no, no" it's in most of these B movies that are poorly made.

Go back to acting and writing school. The movies coming out of Hollywood are mostly B fast tracked to meet a certain criteria and pushed out to the public to watch.

Creativity is gone and no one has an imagination enough to create something special, different and worthy for the public to spend time watching.

These writers can learn from the greats like Alfred Hitchcock. Let the audience imagine what's coming next, without you, having to show them all the blood and guts..