Ajouter une intrigue dans votre langueIn 2037, humanity faces extinction from a virus causing global infertility. No births in 25 years. Corporations control puppet governments, while Biocorp, the largest, dangles false hopes of... Tout lireIn 2037, humanity faces extinction from a virus causing global infertility. No births in 25 years. Corporations control puppet governments, while Biocorp, the largest, dangles false hopes of a cure.In 2037, humanity faces extinction from a virus causing global infertility. No births in 25 years. Corporations control puppet governments, while Biocorp, the largest, dangles false hopes of a cure.
- Réalisation
- Scénario
- Casting principal
Photos
Avis à la une
Just one pathetic scene was all it took for me to think:
"I'd better check the rating on IMDB in case I'm just wasting my time hoping that this will get better".
Ha ha ha ha. Rating of 2.2!
And it didn't get any better.
So only about 10 minutes wasted. Thanks IMDB reviewers.
"I'd better check the rating on IMDB in case I'm just wasting my time hoping that this will get better".
Ha ha ha ha. Rating of 2.2!
And it didn't get any better.
So only about 10 minutes wasted. Thanks IMDB reviewers.
Look I don't want to say more then I hope the whole team learned something about each details on this movie
I saw the cover and read the plot I was excited to see it
But with this kind of money u could of done better job guys , I know I admire film makers
I know it's tough out there but at least for .Fur the next time move the story ,
Audiences get bored even though I supported u and rented it .
The title says it all: they ripped off the premise of the film (and later television show) 12 Monkeys. Period. That's it. They made some VERY minor changes, hired some less than stellar actors, and viola - there you have it.
12 Monkeys (as a film) wasn't great, even with Brad Pitt and Bruce Willis. To my surprise, I liked the Sci-Fi Channel iteration much better, but even that wasn't Grade A.
Save the hour or so of your life you'll never get back and skip this.
12 Monkeys (as a film) wasn't great, even with Brad Pitt and Bruce Willis. To my surprise, I liked the Sci-Fi Channel iteration much better, but even that wasn't Grade A.
Save the hour or so of your life you'll never get back and skip this.
I don't want to be cruel here but I have to because this movie tried to be terminator and it came off as boring and confusing, I watched 30 minutes of it and was so bored and didn't get part of the storyline. Wish I could get that $1.75 I spent at Redbox for this movie.
'Mad World' drew me into seeing it, with a cool poster/cover, an intriguing if not particularly original premise and as someone with a general appreciation for the genre. That it was low-budget, which from frequent personal experience is rarely a good sign due to that there are so many poor ones out there, made me though apprehensive as well as the low rating and poor reviews.
It is sadly however yet another film seen recently, hence some reiteration because the exact same strengths and flaws those films have are present here, that to me was incredibly disappointing considering its potential which it doesn't do anywhere near enough with. 'Mad World' is yet another terrible film, with a plethora of problems (huge ones too). There is nothing to recommend here, no redeeming qualities at all.
The acting all round is pretty diabolical, exceptions are none, with a bad mix of hamminess and phoning in.
Visually, 'Mad World' looks drab and far from slick, with a cheap, limited set that completely fails to show any sense of claustrophobia or tension, drab photography and not always cohesive editing. The dialogue is from the very start to the silly and anti-climactic finish has no natural flow and makes one cringe. The ending doesn't feel like one at all, it feels unresolved, abrupt and incomplete.
Characters have minimal at best development and are either bland, ridiculously annoying or both with some illogical decision making. The story is dull, never coming to life, dreary in atmosphere with no tension or suspense at all and fails to make sense too often. The direction is as flat as a pancake and what should have been intriguing was instead ridiculous and barely plausible.
Overall, terrible. 1/10 Bethany Cox
It is sadly however yet another film seen recently, hence some reiteration because the exact same strengths and flaws those films have are present here, that to me was incredibly disappointing considering its potential which it doesn't do anywhere near enough with. 'Mad World' is yet another terrible film, with a plethora of problems (huge ones too). There is nothing to recommend here, no redeeming qualities at all.
The acting all round is pretty diabolical, exceptions are none, with a bad mix of hamminess and phoning in.
Visually, 'Mad World' looks drab and far from slick, with a cheap, limited set that completely fails to show any sense of claustrophobia or tension, drab photography and not always cohesive editing. The dialogue is from the very start to the silly and anti-climactic finish has no natural flow and makes one cringe. The ending doesn't feel like one at all, it feels unresolved, abrupt and incomplete.
Characters have minimal at best development and are either bland, ridiculously annoying or both with some illogical decision making. The story is dull, never coming to life, dreary in atmosphere with no tension or suspense at all and fails to make sense too often. The direction is as flat as a pancake and what should have been intriguing was instead ridiculous and barely plausible.
Overall, terrible. 1/10 Bethany Cox
Meilleurs choix
Connectez-vous pour évaluer et suivre la liste de favoris afin de recevoir des recommandations personnalisées
- How long is Dystopia?Alimenté par Alexa
Détails
Box-office
- Budget
- 1 $US (estimé)
- Durée1 heure 37 minutes
- Couleur
- Rapport de forme
- 1.78 : 1
Contribuer à cette page
Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant