Un remake en images de synthèse du film Disney de 1989.Un remake en images de synthèse du film Disney de 1989.Un remake en images de synthèse du film Disney de 1989.
- Réalisation
- Scénario
- Casting principal
- Récompenses
- 2 victoires et 31 nominations au total
7,2172.7K
Activité inhabituelle
Our rating mechanism has detected unusual voting activity on this title. To preserve the reliability of our rating system, an alternate weighting calculation has been applied.
Résumé
Reviewers say 'The Little Mermaid' live-action remake garners mixed reactions. Halle Bailey's Ariel and Melissa McCarthy's Ursula are praised for their performances. Visual effects and underwater scenes are lauded, yet CGI for animals is criticized. Pacing and runtime issues are noted, alongside mixed feedback on new songs and plot changes. The film is seen as decent, with strong performances and visuals, but flawed storytelling and character designs.
Avis à la une
The cgi in some scenes looks pretty weird, as avatar has elevated the way you record and do cgi underwater. The way they made the animals are so strange it seems that they have no life or emotions, as if it were all superfluous, the way the villain is not afraid, I tried to like it more it's just another live action to get rid of sales and reversals of products, without anything very original and without any kind of Disney charm and magic that we were I'm used to seeing it, anyway the Ericks don't have much charisma and it's just Erick with nothing, at the end of it all it's just another live action to be forgotten in a few months.
One actress is not enough to save a movie even if she plays the main character. This happens all the time and this remake is proof of it. The weakest thing in this version, of course, is the CGI characters. I thought the worst thing ever seen in these remakes was the dog from 2019's Lady and the Tramp, but this Flounder is outrageous. It's the Jar Jar Binks of Disney's remakes. And this Sebastian looks odd and graceless. Three years and Disney couldn't do any better? Are you serious? In overall, the underwater scenes are not what I expected to see and, as some critic says, "recreated with Windows 10 screensaver graphics".
Now let me explain what is the problem with Ursula. In an animated feature you can exaggerate the expressions any way you like but you can't do that in live action. This is not Melissa McCarthy's fault, of course, but I don't lend ears to those who praise her performance with biased reasonings. And the changes in the final scene were simply the last straw but I won't spoil anything here. Seriously, I couldn't believe it when I watched it.
In summary, the movie doesn't work because Halle Bailey is surrounded by things that don't work. And that's not Halle's fault, it's all Disney's fault.
Now let me explain what is the problem with Ursula. In an animated feature you can exaggerate the expressions any way you like but you can't do that in live action. This is not Melissa McCarthy's fault, of course, but I don't lend ears to those who praise her performance with biased reasonings. And the changes in the final scene were simply the last straw but I won't spoil anything here. Seriously, I couldn't believe it when I watched it.
In summary, the movie doesn't work because Halle Bailey is surrounded by things that don't work. And that's not Halle's fault, it's all Disney's fault.
Missed the mark in so many ways:
It's a children's movie, why are the colors so dark and muted (I did like Ursula's glowing tentacles)? Not saying it had to be bright, bubble gum pop colors but I could barely see what was going on half the time. Just doesn't seem the imagery was made with children in mind.
Why no background vocals? The musical numbers in the original Little Mermaid were FANTASTIC. This time they tuned them way down and took away all the excitement. Hallie sings well, but I still think background vocals would have made all of the songs sound soooo much better.
Loved Melissa McCarthy as Ursula.
Since they went out of their way to explain why Eric had parents of two races where was the explanation for why King Tristan had daughters of all races?
It was a decent attempt, but an absolute fail at being anywhere close to as good as the original. Meh.
Why no background vocals? The musical numbers in the original Little Mermaid were FANTASTIC. This time they tuned them way down and took away all the excitement. Hallie sings well, but I still think background vocals would have made all of the songs sound soooo much better.
Loved Melissa McCarthy as Ursula.
Since they went out of their way to explain why Eric had parents of two races where was the explanation for why King Tristan had daughters of all races?
It was a decent attempt, but an absolute fail at being anywhere close to as good as the original. Meh.
The Little Mermaid is a good example of what's wrong with Disney these days (at least in my opinion) - besides some casting choices that may rise pro and contra voices (I don't care), this movie is dead like plastic. The songs are stale and uninspired, the special effects department did okay, the actors did okay, but well, the formula of Disney movies is now a walking dead corpse, too many times chewed on. But this is not only a question of modern changes to fit to the taste of zeitgeist but for a long time Disney is like a recycling factory: with every turn of the machine the product gets worse and worse, at least if you don't add something new, fresh and substantial, something creative. So my greatest complain: the music is average, the visuals are average, the story is the typical Disney blabla, the entertaining factor is rather low. A typical movie made from the construction kit branded "Disney". But maybe I'm just getting old and grumpy and my by age weakened eyes and heart cannot see the beauty in this, well, product.
This movie just wasn't good... They added something like 50 minutes but it didn't improve the movie one it, it only made it drag on.
The CGI is poorly done and the tone of the film is dark and gloomy, not bright and colorful as it should be.
The animal characters look terrible. The changes to the songs are ridiculous, the original lyrics weren't problematic in the slightest.
Scuttle's voice is really jarring and the added song is just bad.
The changes made to the ending make the story worse, not better. They didn't need to make Eric weaker to build up Ariel.
The best thing about the movie was Ursula. At least they didn't ruin her.
The CGI is poorly done and the tone of the film is dark and gloomy, not bright and colorful as it should be.
The animal characters look terrible. The changes to the songs are ridiculous, the original lyrics weren't problematic in the slightest.
Scuttle's voice is really jarring and the added song is just bad.
The changes made to the ending make the story worse, not better. They didn't need to make Eric weaker to build up Ariel.
The best thing about the movie was Ursula. At least they didn't ruin her.
Le saviez-vous
- AnecdotesJodi Benson: the original voice of Ariel in La Petite Sirène (1989), appears as the person who gives Ariel a "dinglehopper" (fork) during her and Prince Eric's tour of the market.
- GaffesWhen Ariel jumps into the water and swims to go back to the castle to stop Eric and Vanessa's engagement party, she should be soaking wet, however, she is completely dry.
- Citations
Sir Grimsby: Don't be held back by what you think should be. Think of only what is.
- Crédits fousThe film opens with a quote by "The Little Mermaid" writer Hans Christian Andersen: "But a mermaid has no tears, and therefore she suffers so much more."
- ConnexionsFeatured in AniMat's Crazy Cartoon Cast: Purple Octopus Melissa McCarthy (2019)
- Bandes originalesPart of Your World
Music by Alan Menken
Lyrics by Howard Ashman
Produced by Michael Higham (as Mike Higham) and Alan Menken
Performed by Halle Bailey
Meilleurs choix
Connectez-vous pour évaluer et suivre la liste de favoris afin de recevoir des recommandations personnalisées
Détails
Box-office
- Budget
- 355 100 000 $US (estimé)
- Montant brut aux États-Unis et au Canada
- 298 172 056 $US
- Week-end de sortie aux États-Unis et au Canada
- 95 578 040 $US
- 28 mai 2023
- Montant brut mondial
- 569 626 289 $US
- Durée2 heures 15 minutes
- Couleur
- Mixage
Contribuer à cette page
Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant