NOTE IMDb
4,1/10
23 k
MA NOTE
Un voyou envoyé par Lord Clive pour espionner une bande de pirates révolutionnaires indiens les rejoint à l'improviste, ce qui aboutit, entre 1790 et 1805, à une saga épique de révolte et de... Tout lireUn voyou envoyé par Lord Clive pour espionner une bande de pirates révolutionnaires indiens les rejoint à l'improviste, ce qui aboutit, entre 1790 et 1805, à une saga épique de révolte et de guerre pour la liberté.Un voyou envoyé par Lord Clive pour espionner une bande de pirates révolutionnaires indiens les rejoint à l'improviste, ce qui aboutit, entre 1790 et 1805, à une saga épique de révolte et de guerre pour la liberté.
- Réalisation
- Scénario
- Casting principal
- Récompenses
- 2 victoires et 1 nomination au total
Mohd. Zeeshan Ayyub
- Shanichar
- (as Mohammed Zeeshan Ayyub)
Avis à la une
If u want to see an amazing Amir khan again just see the movie. Everything else is just r u bb i s h. And amir seems so powerful and energetic in his 50s same as he was in his 30s. Hats of to u man.
Don't get me wrong, it's not a good film be any measure. But it's not nearly as bad as the reviews and press makes out to be. There are far
Worse movies out there that deserve the 3/10 score much more than this one. Aamir Khans acting for one was very refreshing. It was a difficult role to play, and despite some really lousy direction and dialogue, he did a fantastic job. I thought the overall story wasn't bad, the period/pirate setting was good as well (could've done without the Jack Sparrow inspiration and slaps though). But it was the direction and execution that just was of very very low quality. On top of that they were way too ambitious with CGI and action sequences given their skills, and that backfired.
Overall a decent story line, fantastic acting by Aamir, but let down by terrible direction and dialogue. Aamir and the audience should probably stay away from this director as a general rule.
Overall a decent story line, fantastic acting by Aamir, but let down by terrible direction and dialogue. Aamir and the audience should probably stay away from this director as a general rule.
I usually never miss an Aamir Khan movie but this time I did due to health issues and time constraints. But I did manage to watch this movie on DVD and I regret not watching it on big screen. Pay no heed to negative reviews as plenty of them are baseless and they have not watched the movie at all.
No, its not like Pirates at all. It may look like coz of the look and feel of the set. But thats the only similarity. I had mixed feelings bcoz of so many negative reviews when I started to watch the movie and just 5 minutes into the movie, I was in complete awe of it. Without giving much on the lines of story and screenplay, I would like to end here by giving this masterpiece an 8 out of 10 for such a visual treat.
No, its not like Pirates at all. It may look like coz of the look and feel of the set. But thats the only similarity. I had mixed feelings bcoz of so many negative reviews when I started to watch the movie and just 5 minutes into the movie, I was in complete awe of it. Without giving much on the lines of story and screenplay, I would like to end here by giving this masterpiece an 8 out of 10 for such a visual treat.
I really like the character of Frangi. Even though he is a trickster, as Azaad say,
Frangi is actually on a quest so independence and freedom consist of breathing for him. Is that really so? Katrinan's role as a dancer was a good decision because even if she can dance very nicely but her acting performance is not enough yet. After performance of Fatima in DANGAL, I watched her for the second time with this film and I liked her again(also very similar to katrina). And Amitabh Bachchan, living legend of India has performed well in this film with Aamir. In short, I think the film was beautiful.
Indian audience have never been kind to an ambitious period drama ever since Mughal e Azam. TOH could have been way better but considering it was made to lure the masses, it did not lack the content as advertised by many negative views.
This project had great detail to production design and background score was gripping. Fatima could have done better and dialogues could have been more impactful. Even with these shortfalls the movie is worth a decent watch and should not have been penned so horribly.
Le saviez-vous
- AnecdotesIt's production in Malta made it the most expensive outdoor production in Indian cinema history.
- ConnexionsReferenced in Kaun Banega Crorepati?: Épisode #9.46 (2018)
Meilleurs choix
Connectez-vous pour évaluer et suivre la liste de favoris afin de recevoir des recommandations personnalisées
- How long is Thugs of Hindostan?Alimenté par Alexa
Détails
Box-office
- Budget
- 20 000 000 $US (estimé)
- Montant brut aux États-Unis et au Canada
- 1 449 848 $US
- Week-end de sortie aux États-Unis et au Canada
- 1 185 386 $US
- 11 nov. 2018
- Montant brut mondial
- 39 570 044 $US
- Durée
- 2h 44min(164 min)
- Couleur
- Mixage
- Rapport de forme
- 2.35 : 1
Contribuer à cette page
Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant