Sodom

It is a film of atmosphere. Two men in an apartment, after one of them helps the other in an embarassing situation. A night and the connection. Options, realities, intentions and a bitter final.

A film proposing reflection. Less exactly a story or solutions but gifted by the fair exploration of ordinary dilemmas, choices, doubts and expressions of help and affection and loneliness.

It is the kind of film selecting in precise manner its audience. And doing that in subtle manner. Because not the subject is axis but the answers , to their reality, of the men.

And the end as a sort of deserved conclusion .

Sodom is nothing very new. But it is a graceful, artful, masterpiece set to beautiful photography and music. Generational conflict makes this film interesting and alive. I can't understand how anyone would dislike or hate it. A film-goer inspects all parts of a film, not just the plot. Although important, the plot is not everything. This film is alive and carried beautifully by only two actors the entire film. Both men are beautiful and perfectly cast. This film is nothing short of beautiful and is a positive image in the genre.

A low-key, intimate character study of two men, an older gay man and a younger, not so straight guy who meet under a unique circumstance late one evening and spend the night together discussing their pasts, their present, and maybe their future. Jo Weil's performance as Michael, the handsome, seasoned older man, is a revelation. A haunting piece of cinema that stays with you long after the film is over.

Jo Weil gives a hypnoticperformance as Michael. Though I'm unsure what the attraction is for him in Will, this was a pretty decent movie about exploring and relationships. If course the ending is something to be desired. The biggest complain I have are the random beach shots to signify inner turmoil. I don't believe that was needed as all it did was take me out of the action.

First Brignall was miscast, and Weir was not. Second the title with its Biblical title and its association with a city damned by supposedly divine intervention was utterly inappropriate. The casting of two men talking and sexually relating through the night did not bore me, as I like that sort of film that is intimate, and no two encounters are ever the same, and the nuances of such meetings can be full of human insight. Eric Rohmer's films are a perfect example on how to succeed in that. But to be honest I did not quite believe that these two would have much to say, and when they did I responded and despite misjudged casting the film has its merits. I disliked the ending, which was as negative as the title. No spoilers although other reviewers have. Sadly again the final scenes reminded me of those novels of the 1950's when it was obligatory ( publishers colluding with public opinion demanded it ) to be negative, but I switched off. A pity as the film could have totally succeeded.