Dispossession: The Great Social Housing Swindle

The documentary is right in the sense that social housing is virtually being eradicated as a consequence of classic market failure coupled with failure from successive government policies. However, the documentary looks at demonizing corporation with fabricated claims which are simply misleading and false. I fear that this movie has an overall negative propaganda effect on uninformed viewers and is too quick to point the finger at corporations and governments as a scapegoat on what has gone wrong with the system with fully acknowledging the good these market participants has done. Being informed on both sides is hugely important, not only does this film not do that but they make unsubstantiated claims which is ill and wrong.

"Dispossession" delves into the escalating attack on social housing estates, and social housing tenants, in London. The phenomenon is global, but the film goes directly to those affected and those who are attempting to fight back against aggressive (big-money, low-ethics) interests driving predatory development. The film is very timely, having come out within weeks of the Grenfell Tower fire, and in the midst of ongoing UK election.

Anyone interested in housing as a civil right, and a human right, must see this film. Interviews with tenants, community organizers, architects, urbanist, scholars and involved politicians, provide a wide range of genuinely informed testimony.

Ted Landrum co-curator, Architecture + Design Film Festival Winnipeg

I don't have tons to add since I believe 'landrum' captured it perfectly. What I took away from this film though, was how we're seeing similar things happen with your typical market rentals.

Currently in Ontario, the dogged determination to build every condo development in the Downtown core went from interesting to obscene over the last five years. If there's a patch of green somewhere, they're building on it. Tear down historic buildings and throw two 50+ monstrosities opposite each other on the same street.

The developers went as far as to band together and start running ads on TV and YouTube for their YIMBY (Yes, In My Backyard) campaign, as a direct counter to residents saying - NIMBY (Not In My Backyard). The ads themselves were too close in style to some Gov't of Ontario ad campaigns which felt like some sneaky, subliminal attempt to link the two.

The basic selling point is, "It's great to have all these new developments! It'll give people places to live that's closer to the economic hub, it'll stimulate the economy, it'll improve property values, etc. etc." Question is, HOW MANY PEOPLE do they think can afford a 400 sq. ft. shoebox starting at $450K??? No one disagrees that people need housing, but everyone knows they're cramming them into downtown Toronto because they can get the most $$$ for it, period. Location, location, location! No one (including our gov't) seems interested in providing standard apartment rentals for the regular Joe.

It's a safe bet to say 60-70% of the people working downtown, don't make enough to afford those properties. But with regular apartment buildings in limited supply now, there are bidding wars (it happened to a friend) on basic apartments. Property managements are harassing long-standing tenants out of properties because they're missing out on $600+/month increases. There are three seniors on my floor who've lived here for over 20 years and the things theycra receive eviction threats over are mind boggling!!!! Luckily, these seniors are fighters, but not everyone is.

Many of these condos are also "self-contained" with their own mini-malls, gyms etc. They don't integrate into the community (unless it's already high end)--they tolerate it. So now, the Tim Horton's employee working 60hrs a week downtown has to trek to the far reaches of the city and hope to *maybe* find a crappy basement apartment. Because yes, with regular rentals in short supply, these are now worth $1,200+/month with landlords doing the bare minimum....because what choices do renters have? But ya, keep selling us the story about how they're doing a public good and providing housing "for all."

It's a disgusting money grab from developers and government alike. That's why this film resonated with me so much. It's not just about developers and tenants, or gov't housing vs. regular rentals. It's about the haves vs. have nots....it's a scary place to be.