Un agent de la CIA et son traducteur échappent aux forces spéciales en Afghanistan après avoir démasqué une mission secrète.Un agent de la CIA et son traducteur échappent aux forces spéciales en Afghanistan après avoir démasqué une mission secrète.Un agent de la CIA et son traducteur échappent aux forces spéciales en Afghanistan après avoir démasqué une mission secrète.
- Réalisation
- Scénario
- Casting principal
Avis à la une
This is a perfectly good movie. The comparisons to The Covenant, Guy Ritchie's movie with Jake Gyllenhaal are understandable, and while there are some similarities, it is not a like for like by any means. There are in fact many differences. I won't spell them out for fear of giving spoilers, but if you watch both movies you will get my point. Gerard Butler does seem to be the go to guy for an awful lot of action movies over the last five plus years, but there is a good reason for that. He meets the requirements of a Hollywood hero very well; handsome, likeable, tough and and pretty decent actor for the most part. I enjoyed the movie and would recommend to anyone who likes action/military type movies.
The film's strengths lie in its action sequences and Butler's performance. The action sequences are well-choreographed and exciting, and Butler gives a strong performance as the CIA operative. However, the film's weaknesses are its predictability and lack of originality. The plot is very predictable, and the film relies heavily on clichés and stereotypes. Overall, Kandahar is an average action thriller film that is worth watching for Butler's performance, but it is not a must-see film.
Here are some of the pros and cons of the film:
Pros:
Gerard Butler gives a strong performance.
The action sequences are well-choreographed and exciting.
The film is shot beautifully, capturing the harsh beauty of the Afghan landscape.
Cons:
The plot is predictable.
The film relies heavily on clichés and stereotypes.
The film is slow-paced at times.
Overall, Kandahar is an average action thriller film that is worth watching for Butler's performance, but it is not a must-see film.
Here are some of the pros and cons of the film:
Pros:
Gerard Butler gives a strong performance.
The action sequences are well-choreographed and exciting.
The film is shot beautifully, capturing the harsh beauty of the Afghan landscape.
Cons:
The plot is predictable.
The film relies heavily on clichés and stereotypes.
The film is slow-paced at times.
Overall, Kandahar is an average action thriller film that is worth watching for Butler's performance, but it is not a must-see film.
After the explosion i got lost in this movie. Everyone is against each other and all together are chasing the spy and the poor translator. Every force that passed ftom the region in the last 20 years (USA,Talibans,ISIS,Al Quaeda,Pakistan) are put in a mixer with no begging and no end. There are many plotholes and some times is slow paced. It is so tiring that i hardly kept myself of not falling asleep.
There are some good action scenes. Many collateral plots running together made the movie complicated. Nothing to compare to the Convenant. I'd rather compare it to "Plane",Buttler's previous movie.
Really,does Hollywood lacks of military and geostrategical advisors?
The scenario is like it is written by a 10 years old kid.
The duration should be max 90' no more because it is too tiring. It is from the kind of movies that i'd expect from netflix,and i would watch it only once.
There are some good action scenes. Many collateral plots running together made the movie complicated. Nothing to compare to the Convenant. I'd rather compare it to "Plane",Buttler's previous movie.
Really,does Hollywood lacks of military and geostrategical advisors?
The scenario is like it is written by a 10 years old kid.
The duration should be max 90' no more because it is too tiring. It is from the kind of movies that i'd expect from netflix,and i would watch it only once.
Butler is always good for the slick action movie, and has made a career as some of the most consistent action stars. While he never achieved anything compared to 300, it's hard to point a finger at a film that did not entertain.
Butler goes somewhat beyond his limited range in Kandahar with some success. There is a real attempt to create character and suspense, which is at points refreshing and at points boring. Nothing is revolutionary, the baddies get some lines of dialogue (be warned, you will have to read a lot of subtitles!) and there is some sad music playing, but that's about the extent of it. Richie's Covenant also tackles the same setting, with overall better results.
The ending is predictable and ridiculous, devolving into explosion city, but what did I expect?
There is about 20 mins to be cut from this, but it has enough going for it that I can forgive the draggy parts, and appreciate the attempt at substance.
7/10 - if your expectations are right...
Butler goes somewhat beyond his limited range in Kandahar with some success. There is a real attempt to create character and suspense, which is at points refreshing and at points boring. Nothing is revolutionary, the baddies get some lines of dialogue (be warned, you will have to read a lot of subtitles!) and there is some sad music playing, but that's about the extent of it. Richie's Covenant also tackles the same setting, with overall better results.
The ending is predictable and ridiculous, devolving into explosion city, but what did I expect?
There is about 20 mins to be cut from this, but it has enough going for it that I can forgive the draggy parts, and appreciate the attempt at substance.
7/10 - if your expectations are right...
An OK movie with nice action scenes...
Very flawed when it comes to script, and one of the worst jobs in soundtracking (songs have absolutely nothing to do with the scenes).
But acting is solid, it has nice visuals, camera work is nice, director does a reasonably good job.
You can watch it for the nice actions sequences and ok plot, but the movie is quite forgettable in terms of writing and does not know what it really wants...tries to focus on too many things (character drama, action, war, politics) but not cohesively.
Anyway...nice fun, nice action, but do not expect much more than that.
(I'm done but I still have to type a fewore characters before IMDb allows me to publish)
But acting is solid, it has nice visuals, camera work is nice, director does a reasonably good job.
You can watch it for the nice actions sequences and ok plot, but the movie is quite forgettable in terms of writing and does not know what it really wants...tries to focus on too many things (character drama, action, war, politics) but not cohesively.
Anyway...nice fun, nice action, but do not expect much more than that.
(I'm done but I still have to type a fewore characters before IMDb allows me to publish)
Le saviez-vous
- AnecdotesThis is the second American movie to shoot entirely in Saudi Arabia.
- Gaffes1 hour and 20 minutes into the movie, there is a scene with 4 executed people lying on the floor. The dead person in the middle left of the row, opens his eye and looks at the camera.
- Citations
Mohammad 'Mo' Doud: You must go home to remember what you are fighting for.
- ConnexionsFeatured in Brad Tries Podcasting: Fast X/Kandahar/Martyrs (2023)
Meilleurs choix
Connectez-vous pour évaluer et suivre la liste de favoris afin de recevoir des recommandations personnalisées
- How long is Kandahar?Alimenté par Alexa
Détails
- Date de sortie
- Pays d’origine
- Site officiel
- Langues
- Aussi connu sous le nom de
- Escape bajo fuego
- Lieux de tournage
- Sociétés de production
- Voir plus de crédits d'entreprise sur IMDbPro
Box-office
- Montant brut aux États-Unis et au Canada
- 4 813 132 $US
- Week-end de sortie aux États-Unis et au Canada
- 2 325 388 $US
- 28 mai 2023
- Montant brut mondial
- 9 387 311 $US
- Durée1 heure 59 minutes
- Couleur
- Rapport de forme
- 2.39 : 1
Contribuer à cette page
Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant