[go: up one dir, main page]

    Calendrier de sortiesLes 250 meilleurs filmsLes films les plus populairesRechercher des films par genreMeilleur box officeHoraires et billetsActualités du cinémaPleins feux sur le cinéma indien
    Ce qui est diffusé à la télévision et en streamingLes 250 meilleures sériesÉmissions de télévision les plus populairesParcourir les séries TV par genreActualités télévisées
    Que regarderLes dernières bandes-annoncesProgrammes IMDb OriginalChoix d’IMDbCoup de projecteur sur IMDbGuide de divertissement pour la famillePodcasts IMDb
    EmmysSuperheroes GuideSan Diego Comic-ConSummer Watch GuideBest Of 2025 So FarDisability Pride MonthSTARmeter AwardsAwards CentralFestivalsTous les événements
    Né aujourd'huiLes célébrités les plus populairesActualités des célébrités
    Centre d'aideZone des contributeursSondages
Pour les professionnels de l'industrie
  • Langue
  • Entièrement prise en charge
  • English (United States)
    Partiellement prise en charge
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Liste de favoris
Se connecter
  • Entièrement prise en charge
  • English (United States)
    Partiellement prise en charge
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Utiliser l'appli
  • Distribution et équipe technique
  • Avis des utilisateurs
  • Anecdotes
  • FAQ
IMDbPro

Sorry to Bother You

  • 2018
  • Tous publics avec avertissement
  • 1h 52min
NOTE IMDb
6,9/10
92 k
MA NOTE
POPULARITÉ
3 897
1 010
LaKeith Stanfield in Sorry to Bother You (2018)
In an alternate present-day version of Oakland, telemarketer Cassius Green discovers a magical key to professional success, propelling him into a macabre universe.
Lire trailer2:31
35 Videos
99+ photos
Dark ComedySatireWorkplace DramaComedyDramaFantasySci-Fi

Dans la ville d'Oakland d'un monde parallèle, Cassius Green découvre une clé magique pour atteindre le succès professionnel le propulsant dans un univers d'avidité.Dans la ville d'Oakland d'un monde parallèle, Cassius Green découvre une clé magique pour atteindre le succès professionnel le propulsant dans un univers d'avidité.Dans la ville d'Oakland d'un monde parallèle, Cassius Green découvre une clé magique pour atteindre le succès professionnel le propulsant dans un univers d'avidité.

  • Réalisation
    • Boots Riley
  • Scénario
    • Boots Riley
  • Casting principal
    • LaKeith Stanfield
    • Tessa Thompson
    • Jermaine Fowler
  • Voir les informations de production sur IMDbPro
  • NOTE IMDb
    6,9/10
    92 k
    MA NOTE
    POPULARITÉ
    3 897
    1 010
    • Réalisation
      • Boots Riley
    • Scénario
      • Boots Riley
    • Casting principal
      • LaKeith Stanfield
      • Tessa Thompson
      • Jermaine Fowler
    • 520avis d'utilisateurs
    • 219avis des critiques
    • 78Métascore
  • Voir les informations de production sur IMDbPro
    • Récompenses
      • 20 victoires et 56 nominations au total

    Vidéos35

    Red Band Trailer
    Trailer 2:14
    Red Band Trailer
    Official Trailer
    Trailer 2:31
    Official Trailer
    Official Trailer
    Trailer 2:31
    Official Trailer
    Sorry To Bother You
    Trailer 2:32
    Sorry To Bother You
    A Salute to Black Directors
    Clip 4:16
    A Salute to Black Directors
    IMDbrief: Meet the Top Stars & Breakout Stars of 2018
    Clip 2:49
    IMDbrief: Meet the Top Stars & Breakout Stars of 2018
    White Voice
    Clip 0:46
    White Voice

    Photos155

    Voir l'affiche
    Voir l'affiche
    Voir l'affiche
    Voir l'affiche
    Voir l'affiche
    + 150
    Voir l'affiche

    Rôles principaux93

    Modifier
    LaKeith Stanfield
    LaKeith Stanfield
    • Cassius Green
    • (as Lakeith Stanfield)
    Tessa Thompson
    Tessa Thompson
    • Detroit
    Jermaine Fowler
    Jermaine Fowler
    • Salvador
    Omari Hardwick
    Omari Hardwick
    • Mr. _______
    Terry Crews
    Terry Crews
    • Sergio
    Kate Berlant
    Kate Berlant
    • Diana DeBauchery
    Michael X. Sommers
    Michael X. Sommers
    • Johnny
    Danny Glover
    Danny Glover
    • Langston
    Steven Yeun
    Steven Yeun
    • Squeeze
    Armie Hammer
    Armie Hammer
    • Steve Lift
    Robert Longstreet
    Robert Longstreet
    • Anderson
    David Cross
    David Cross
    • Cassius's White Voice
    • (voix)
    Patton Oswalt
    Patton Oswalt
    • Mr. _______'s White Voice
    • (voix)
    Lily James
    Lily James
    • Detroit's White British Voice
    • (voix)
    Forest Whitaker
    Forest Whitaker
    • First Equisapien…
    Rosario Dawson
    Rosario Dawson
    • Voice in Elevator
    • (voix)
    Shelley Mitchell
    Shelley Mitchell
    • Mrs. Costello
    Jerry McDaniel Jr.
    Jerry McDaniel Jr.
    • Man Eating Dinner
    • (as Jerry Mcdaniel Jr.)
    • Réalisation
      • Boots Riley
    • Scénario
      • Boots Riley
    • Toute la distribution et toute l’équipe technique
    • Production, box office et plus encore chez IMDbPro

    Avis des utilisateurs520

    6,992K
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10

    Avis à la une

    8buttonsforeyes

    If Terry Gilliam were black . . . .

    Marvellous, odd ball & a great way to spend a couple of hours. If you like wacky story telling or anything by the great Gilliam then this will work for you. American cinema needs this kind of indie style movie, to offset the general bilge produced by US mainstream cinema. Beautifully shot, with a barking story line - A fine way to pass an evening.
    7Bertaut

    A sharp satire that runs a little too long and takes a bizarre left-turn that will alienate many

    A paean to the proletariat. A pro-union battle cry. An ideological evisceration of late capitalism. A deconstruction of corporate greed and the concomitant commercialisation of self-worth necessary to succeed. A critique of identity politics. An allegory of institutional racism in big business. A lampooning of Silicon Valley bro culture. Sorry to Bother You, the debut feature of writer/director Boots Riley, is all this, and more. Very much in the key of absurdist fiction such as Dino Buzzati's Il deserto dei Tartari (1940) and Ralph Ellison's Invisible Man (1952), as well as race-conscious satirical cinema such as Putney Swope (1969) and Watermelon Man (1970), the film draws more direct inspiration from Johann Wolfgang von Goethe's Faust (c.1806-1831), Repo Man (1984), and the work of Spike Jonze, Michel Gondry, and, bizarrely, Ken Loach.

    A black comedy/Juvenalian satire/science fiction/horror/magic realist/allegorical character study, it's impossible to classify. Dealing with the obstacles facing African Americans in a white-dominated corporate milieu, and positing that the experience of workers is determined by both labour conditions and race, the film examines labour relations, wage issues, worker solidarity, unionism, mass media, and the dangers of betraying oneself and choosing corporate advancement over friendships, relationships, and personal integrity. Although it's a beat or two too long, and although the spectacularly bizarre left-turn at the end of the second act will surely alienate a lot of viewers, the deconstruction and comic appropriation of code-switching results in a film that is constantly inventive, highly confrontational, and extremely funny.

    Set in Oakland, California in an "alternate present", the company WorryFree offers food and lodging in exchange for a lifetime labour contract with no wages, a practice which the Supreme Court has deemed legal and not equivalent to slavery. Standing against WorryFree is the radical group "Left Eye", who organise protests and vandalise WorryFree's billboards. Meanwhile, Cash Green (LaKeith Stanfield) is a telemarketer working for RegalView, who, upon the advice of a veteran co-worker (Danny Glover), discovers his "white voice" and rises to the top of the company's food chain. Gradually, however, he learns that RegalView is selling slave labour to WorryFree. Torn between exposing WorryFree and his substantial earnings, Cash's dilemma is exacerbated when WorryFree CEO, Steve Lift (a spectacular Armie Hammer) offers him a $1 million a year contract. However, Cash then makes a discovery that changes everything, not just for himself, but potentially for all of humanity.

    At its heart, Sorry to Bother is an anti-corporate, proletarian rally cry, something with which Riley has been engaged for decades as lead vocalist for The Coup and Sweet Sweeper Social Club. However, unlike the recent satire Assassination Nation (2018), Sorry to Bother You is not especially interested in politics per se, certainly not in the explicit sense of films such as La grève (1925), Objectif vérité (1969), or Bulworth (1998).

    This is not to say that the film ignores politics completely, rather it approaches the subject obliquely. For example, the country's most popular TV show, I Got the S--t Kicked Out of Me, involves people being violently assaulted by family and friends and then dunked in a vat of faeces, with Riley providing little to no contextualisation (think It's Not My Problem! from RoboCop (1987), where Bixby Snyder's (S.D. Nemeth) catchphrase, "I'd buy that for a dollar", is used as a one-size-fits-all response to every situation). This mindless consumption of meaningless and morally questionable content indicates the passivity of the masses, their critical faculties either dormant or absent entirely (an inverse verfremdungseffekt, if you will). Clips of the show feature prominently throughout the film, allowing Riley to depict a milieu where popular entertainment has reached an unimaginable low. Another example of a pseudo-political aspect of the film are the ubiquitous billboards and TV commercials advertising WorryFree, suggesting the corruption or co-opting of mass media.

    Riley's focus is very much on economic issues, with a lot of the humour derived from pecuniary-based situations. One of the easiest ways to parse the film is to approach it as a parable about selling out, equal parts polemic and acknowledgement that it's next to impossible not to sell out in some way. Indeed, the last act of the film explicitly deals with the literal dehumanisation of the workforce (and I do mean "literal"). RegalView and WorryFree exist in an economic system built upon impoverishing the many for the benefit of the few, with Riley attempting to expose the importance of a poverty line for the continued functioning of late capitalism. Within such a system, he suggests, it is exceptionally difficult for African Americans to succeed unless they are willing to code-switch. In this sense, although the concept of "white voice" does have a practical function within the narrative, its most salient characteristic is as an object of allegorical satire, a hyperbolic caricature of what African Americans need to do to survive in the Caucasian bro-culture corporate ranks of Silicon Valley; they must literally relinquish part of the self and pretend to be something Other.

    Aesthetically, the film adopts a visual style obviously influenced by Michel Gondry, and, to a lesser extent, Terry Gilliam. An especially interesting aesthetic device, as anyone who has seen the trailer can attest, is how white voice is handled - rather than having the actors simply speak in a different voice, Riley instead has the white actors' voices overdubbed; when Cash's friend Salvador (Jermaine Fowler) first hears Cash's white voice, he literally tells him "you sound overdubbed". However, the lip syncing is, presumably intentionally, far from perfect, with the voice not quite aligning with the actors' mouth movements. This throws the scenes "off" ever so slightly, creating an extra layer of surreality, and highlighting just how absurd the whole thing is, drawing attention to the lengths these people have to go to achieve real success. The fact that our culture places such value on "correct" intonation is, in and of itself, absurd, like an extreme version of the phone voice that pretty much everyone has, and by failing to perfectly sync white voice to black actor, Riley is able to deconstruct and draw attention to this absurdity.

    The film's other big aesthetic innovation is having Cash plunge (not especially gracefully) into the living room of the people he calls, desk and all. Obviously, this draws attention to the level of intrusion with which most people greet telemarketers, but, at least in the early stages, it also highlights Cash's own discomfit at being the intruder, seen most clearly when he drops in on a couple having sex. This is an excellently-handled piece of visual shorthand, conveying Cash's internal process, without having him verbalise it at any point.

    Also impressive is the acting. While the standout performances are definitely Hammer and Omari Hardwick (playing Mr. _______, Cash's superior at WorryFree), Stanfield certainly holds his own, with his body-language providing a clinic of wordless performing. Early on in the film, he's hunched over and put-upon, his every movement seemingly uncomfortable, as if ill at ease in his own skin. Later on, however, after his promotion at RegalView, his physicality acquires a more easy nature, he carries himself more confidently, as if high-powered telemarketing has helped him to find himself, something which is, in the context of the whole, doubly ironic. And no matter how surreal things get (and trust me, they get very, very surreal), the cast keep everything grounded, as if what they're experiencing at any given moment is the most natural thing in the world.

    Of course, it isn't all perfect. The wildly unexpected plot twist at the end of the second act will be too much for some people (there were multiple walk-outs at the screening I attended). The film is also just a beat or two too long, and the bottom does fall out to an extent before it reaches its madcap dénouement. There's also a mid-credit scene that serves as a kind of epilogue that I'm led to believe was a re-shoot when test audiences found the initial ending too abrupt. For me, however, it doesn't entirely work, and I would have much preferred the original, somewhat darker, ending. Also, with so much satire and humour floating about, almost by definition, not every joke lands, However, the flip side to this is that when Riley's humour does hit the target, it's sublime - Mr. _______ literally beep-denied a name, for example, or Cash's two-word rap being gleefully cheered by Lift's assembled yuppies.

    Sorry to Bother You is as timely and relevant as it is funny and irreverent, as progressive as it is radical, and as inventive as it is confident. Exploring the intersection between race and economics from a wholly satirical point-of-view, the film both condemns and sympathises with those who choose to sell-out in some way so as to climb the ladder of success. Now in his late-40s, Riley is a veteran political protestor, a Chomsky-literate agitator, who is here positing that the most significant divide in the US isn't between white and black, it's between those with money and those without. Suggesting that the desire to cross this divide can lead to a herd mentality, the film argues that the labour force must never forget their collective strength, and must never turn on one another, as in such a situation, management will use workers like horses.
    7zfischer-20437

    A Darkly Funny Satire

    Sorry To Bother You is a weird film. Not that that's a bad thing. It takes strange twists and turns, all while saying interesting things and presenting something thought provoking.

    STBY is about Cassius "Cash" Green, a man who just needs to make a buck at his horrible telemarketer job and just get by. After finding he has a talent for sales while using his "white voice", he's propelled to the upper echelon of elite salespeople at the company. But that's just the first act. Any more and I'll spoil what this film has in store for you. The pace of it all is very quick and kept me wondering what could happen next. Every time I thought I knew where it was going, it jerked me into another dimension. The only gripe I had with the story is that the side plot of the friend who is trying to get with his girlfriend seems totally unnecessary. It could be taken out of the movie completely and nothing would be different.

    The acting is great, with all the actors either embracing the insanity or not knowing what exactly to do with it. Everyone is fun to watch and see how they would react to their new situations.

    The cinematography was excellent. From the first act and how dull and drab and out of focus everything is due to our main character's disinterest in his life and job, to the second act's sharp clarity where he is focused on doing the best he can at his job. The third act feels like a dream where everything is bright but hazy. There's a lot of great subtle visual metaphors throughout that make it fun to analyze as well. I would love to watch this again and see what I missed.

    The soundtrack for this is just as trippy and weird. Lots of loops and weird instrumentation can be heard. Some members of the band Tune-Yards do the composition and it really does show. It keeps the kooky and psychedelic atmosphere alive.

    Aside from some wonky "white voice" lip sync and the one story gripe, this is an awesome movie. Don't expect to laugh as much, but definitely expect to say "WTF???!!???" a whole lot.
    7djbattick

    Hmm

    I always try to base my judgement of a film, on how much it can bring forth my emotions. The more a film can invoke my feelings the; whether that be love, fear or joy. That is what makes a movie great. I have stuck to that rule my whole life, and whether I am feeling in awe at another Nolan epic, or pure bitter frustration at sharknado 13, I have never stumbled across a single film to which I can make an exception.

    That was in fact until I embarked on the journey known as "sorry to bother you".

    This film is strange. I mean, reallyyy strange. A dystopian reality is constructed, using cheerful and colourful, mise-en-scene, picture and sound; as a poorly crafted mask to cover the dark undertones which hide in plain sight. The acting? Seamless. The humour? Hilarious. The plot? A positive unorthodox. And yet what emotion of mine does this film invoke? Misery.

    The alternative reality conjured is so surreal, yet so real. The psychopathic nature of every single aspect of this creation bears all too many similarities to the world we too live in. So hyperbolized, so ridiculous, but still so true. Immediately after whatching this film I had to call my best friend, just to hear a sane voice, as even the one in my own head was failing to provide me that comfort.

    This film does exactly what it sets out to do, it does so in stupendous fashion. And yet, I hated it. I recommended that none of my friends watch it. Though smiling throughout, my overall emotion was of such discomfort, that I really did not want anybody to go through the same. This is the best worst film I have ever seen. My rating has fluctuated from 4-10 throughout the writing of this review. But here you have it. 7/10. My final answer, a mediocre score, for a far from mediocre film.
    8bkickish

    This Movie Will Mess You Up a Little

    I won't give anything away, but just prepare to be shocked and a little messed up by this movie. It's an understatement to say that it's not the movie you think you're gonna see. With that being said, it's got plenty of humor and we really liked it...but it definitely messed us up a little. You're gonna want to phone a friend after the movie ends so you can re-adjust to the real world.

    Vous aimerez aussi

    Ils ont cloné Tyrone
    6,6
    Ils ont cloné Tyrone
    Judas and the Black Messiah
    7,4
    Judas and the Black Messiah
    Blindspotting
    7,4
    Blindspotting
    BlacKkKlansman : J'ai infiltré le Ku Klux Klan
    7,5
    BlacKkKlansman : J'ai infiltré le Ku Klux Klan
    Dope
    7,2
    Dope
    Signe astrologique : Vierge
    7,1
    Signe astrologique : Vierge
    Sorry to Bother
    Sorry to Bother
    Atlanta
    8,6
    Atlanta
    Swiss Army Man
    6,9
    Swiss Army Man
    The Big Sick
    7,5
    The Big Sick
    Uncut Gems
    7,4
    Uncut Gems
    Je veux juste en finir
    6,5
    Je veux juste en finir

    Histoire

    Modifier

    Le saviez-vous

    Modifier
    • Anecdotes
      At one point, Detroit wears a pair of earrings with the phrases BURY THE RAG and DEEP IN YOUR FACE. These are lyrics from "The Lonesome Death of Hattie Carroll" by Bob Dylan, which is a protest song about a poor African-American woman murdered by a wealthy white man. ("Bury the rag deep in your face/ Now's the time for your tears".)
    • Gaffes
      When Detroit is caught while vandalizing an advertisement for WorryFree, the letters she spray paints on the wall change from "S" to "SL" and back to "S" between shots.
    • Citations

      Sergio: Hey, Cash. How much longer I gotta wait for my money?

      Cassius Green: God made this land for all of us. Greedy people like you want to hog it to yourself, and your family.

      Sergio: Me and my family?

      Cassius Green: Yeah.

      Sergio: Cassius, I'm your fuckin' uncle.

    • Crédits fous
      There's a mid-credits scene.
    • Connexions
      Featured in The Tonight Show Starring Jimmy Fallon: Armie Hammer/Meghan Trainor/Rupi Kaur/Bebe Rexha (2018)
    • Bandes originales
      Victors of the Age
      Written by Boots Riley and Damion Gallegos

      Performed by The Coup

    Meilleurs choix

    Connectez-vous pour évaluer et suivre la liste de favoris afin de recevoir des recommandations personnalisées
    Se connecter

    FAQ20

    • How long is Sorry to Bother You?Alimenté par Alexa

    Détails

    Modifier
    • Date de sortie
      • 30 janvier 2019 (France)
    • Pays d’origine
      • États-Unis
    • Sites officiels
      • Official Facebook
      • Official site
    • Langue
      • Anglais
    • Aussi connu sous le nom de
      • Вибач, що турбую
    • Lieux de tournage
      • Franklin Street between 19th and 17th, Oakland, Californie, États-Unis(Protest scene)
    • Sociétés de production
      • Cinereach
      • MACRO
      • MNM Creative
    • Voir plus de crédits d'entreprise sur IMDbPro

    Box-office

    Modifier
    • Budget
      • 3 200 000 $US (estimé)
    • Montant brut aux États-Unis et au Canada
      • 17 493 096 $US
    • Week-end de sortie aux États-Unis et au Canada
      • 727 266 $US
      • 8 juil. 2018
    • Montant brut mondial
      • 18 170 707 $US
    Voir les infos détaillées du box-office sur IMDbPro

    Spécifications techniques

    Modifier
    • Durée
      1 heure 52 minutes
    • Couleur
      • Color
    • Mixage
      • Dolby Digital
    • Rapport de forme
      • 2.39 : 1

    Contribuer à cette page

    Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant
    LaKeith Stanfield in Sorry to Bother You (2018)
    Lacune principale
    What was the official certification given to Sorry to Bother You (2018) in Italy?
    Répondre
    • Voir plus de lacunes
    • En savoir plus sur la contribution
    Modifier la page

    Découvrir

    Récemment consultés

    Activez les cookies du navigateur pour utiliser cette fonctionnalité. En savoir plus
    Obtenir l'application IMDb
    Identifiez-vous pour accéder à davantage de ressourcesIdentifiez-vous pour accéder à davantage de ressources
    Suivez IMDb sur les réseaux sociaux
    Obtenir l'application IMDb
    Pour Android et iOS
    Obtenir l'application IMDb
    • Aide
    • Index du site
    • IMDbPro
    • Box Office Mojo
    • Licence de données IMDb
    • Salle de presse
    • Annonces
    • Emplois
    • Conditions d'utilisation
    • Politique de confidentialité
    • Your Ads Privacy Choices
    IMDb, une société Amazon

    © 1990-2025 by IMDb.com, Inc.