NOTE IMDb
4,8/10
8,1 k
MA NOTE
Ajouter une intrigue dans votre langueDocumentarian Dinesh D'Souza analyzes the history of the Democratic Party and what he thinks are Hillary Clinton's true motivations.Documentarian Dinesh D'Souza analyzes the history of the Democratic Party and what he thinks are Hillary Clinton's true motivations.Documentarian Dinesh D'Souza analyzes the history of the Democratic Party and what he thinks are Hillary Clinton's true motivations.
- Récompenses
- 4 victoires et 1 nomination au total
Michael Clemons
- President Barack Obama
- (as Michael Clemmons)
Gidget Taylor
- Ida B. Wells
- (as Alesia Gidget Taylor)
‘Snow White’ Stars Test Their Wits
Histoire
Le saviez-vous
- AnecdotesThis is the first movie that critic Brad Jones walked out on. He ranked it #1 in his list of the worst movies of 2016.
- GaffesAt the beginning, Dinesh D'Souza says he was wrongly accused of making a campaign contribution in someone else's name. He actually pleaded guilty to that charge before the court rendered a verdict.
- Citations
One of two unspecified governors on Air Force One: Why do you want these War on Poverty and Great Society programs so much?
President Lyndon B. Johnson: I'll have them niggers voting Democratic for the next two hundred years.
[re: "Inside the White House" by Ronald Kessler, p.33]
- Crédits fousThe opening credits contain the lines "This is a true story. No names were changed to protect the democratic party."
- ConnexionsFeatured in Cinematic Excrement: Hillary's America (2017)
Commentaire à la une
I'll let an intelligent human being see the film and make up their own mind, but for two salient points:
First, the "critics" and "reviewers"on IMDb without a doubt belong to the world of almost 100% left wingers of the entertainment industry. Trying to get an objective review of anything to do with Hillary from out and out libs is impossible. It doesn't matter that every hit Hillary takes has been supported in writing, in the dozens of books that are out showing what a disgrace she is, have never - not once - been sued for slander, misrepresentation, or false testimony. NOT ONCE. That they ducked out of Hillary's way in the WH was quoted by several WH employees in several books. Her vicious and foul language appears on page after page of literally dozens of books. And the lib reviewers here, like all libs, say that "allegations" are not true. If you are going to review a film based upon its fitting your political mode or not, you should recuse yourself. Sounds like the ultra-left wing Vanity Fair at work. Money talks.
Second, expecting an honest review free of personal political input from a person who is supposedly a viable, open, fair minded writer who supposedly has perspective in a movie such as this is about the same as American colleges today. The vast - well over 90% of American colleges and universities - are so far left that any student in them today fears to open his or her mouth with anything that smacks of center or god forbid Republican views. Since the faculties of most, if not all, of those institutions are out and out liberal democrats, the student who wants to get any sort of a recommendation for grad school learns not to open his or her mouth to challenge the overbearing liberal practice of teaching and putting down at every chance anything not liberal. For example, my alma mater (Bowdoin College) a couple years ago reported that 151 of the 156 faculty were liberals. It is pathetic to see reviewers do the same.
Don't be afraid to see the truth. The reason it is not as well known as it could be ("why haven't I heard this before?") is very simple. If you think the entertainment world is left wing, what do you think the media is?
First, the "critics" and "reviewers"on IMDb without a doubt belong to the world of almost 100% left wingers of the entertainment industry. Trying to get an objective review of anything to do with Hillary from out and out libs is impossible. It doesn't matter that every hit Hillary takes has been supported in writing, in the dozens of books that are out showing what a disgrace she is, have never - not once - been sued for slander, misrepresentation, or false testimony. NOT ONCE. That they ducked out of Hillary's way in the WH was quoted by several WH employees in several books. Her vicious and foul language appears on page after page of literally dozens of books. And the lib reviewers here, like all libs, say that "allegations" are not true. If you are going to review a film based upon its fitting your political mode or not, you should recuse yourself. Sounds like the ultra-left wing Vanity Fair at work. Money talks.
Second, expecting an honest review free of personal political input from a person who is supposedly a viable, open, fair minded writer who supposedly has perspective in a movie such as this is about the same as American colleges today. The vast - well over 90% of American colleges and universities - are so far left that any student in them today fears to open his or her mouth with anything that smacks of center or god forbid Republican views. Since the faculties of most, if not all, of those institutions are out and out liberal democrats, the student who wants to get any sort of a recommendation for grad school learns not to open his or her mouth to challenge the overbearing liberal practice of teaching and putting down at every chance anything not liberal. For example, my alma mater (Bowdoin College) a couple years ago reported that 151 of the 156 faculty were liberals. It is pathetic to see reviewers do the same.
Don't be afraid to see the truth. The reason it is not as well known as it could be ("why haven't I heard this before?") is very simple. If you think the entertainment world is left wing, what do you think the media is?
Meilleurs choix
Connectez-vous pour évaluer et suivre la liste de favoris afin de recevoir des recommandations personnalisées
Détails
- Date de sortie
- Pays d’origine
- Sites officiels
- Langue
- Aussi connu sous le nom de
- Hillary's America
- Lieux de tournage
- Société de production
- Voir plus de crédits d'entreprise sur IMDbPro
Box-office
- Budget
- 5 000 000 $US (estimé)
- Montant brut aux États-Unis et au Canada
- 13 099 931 $US
- Week-end de sortie aux États-Unis et au Canada
- 74 814 $US
- 17 juil. 2016
- Montant brut mondial
- 13 099 931 $US
- Durée1 heure 46 minutes
- Couleur
- Mixage
Contribuer à cette page
Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant
Lacune principale
By what name was Hillary's America: The Secret History of the Democratic Party (2016) officially released in India in English?
Répondre