Lumina suit quatre amis qui recherchent désespérément leur ami enlevé dans un DUMB. Qu'ils retrouvent ou non leur ami dans les déserts des États-Unis ou dans les sables du Sahara, leur vie e... Tout lireLumina suit quatre amis qui recherchent désespérément leur ami enlevé dans un DUMB. Qu'ils retrouvent ou non leur ami dans les déserts des États-Unis ou dans les sables du Sahara, leur vie en sera changée à jamais.Lumina suit quatre amis qui recherchent désespérément leur ami enlevé dans un DUMB. Qu'ils retrouvent ou non leur ami dans les déserts des États-Unis ou dans les sables du Sahara, leur vie en sera changée à jamais.
- Réalisation
- Scénario
- Casting principal
Sidney Nicole Brooks
- Patricia
- (as Sidney Nicole Rogers)
Avis à la une
Film starts with a lot of potential, but after about 20 mins it really takes a dive. Plot, script, acting, makeup, location, editing, continuity all dive very low and the originally promising elements evaporate and a low low really low budget poorly thought out and painfully lacking flick emerges. I'm currently 1 hour 15 mins in and I am not sure I can watch any more of it.
If you try it, about 20 mins in when you get to the cop by the pool delivering his line , you'll see the film for what it really is. A disappointing cringeworthy effort (or lack of it).
The stuff that gets through selection for Prime is becoming a joke. A bad one at that.
If you try it, about 20 mins in when you get to the cop by the pool delivering his line , you'll see the film for what it really is. A disappointing cringeworthy effort (or lack of it).
The stuff that gets through selection for Prime is becoming a joke. A bad one at that.
I suppose I should start with the positives, there aren't many so this shouldn't take long. The cinematography is rather good in some parts. And that....is that.
Everything else is terrible. The script. The plot. The acting. The screenplay. The direction. The editing. The CGI. The music. All of it objectively bad. Not poor, but really bad.
The worst thing about it is the unstructured, uninteresting meandering nature of the film. It is just a collection of scenes that mean nothing.
The characters and their relationship to each other is non existent.
You always know a bad movie when Eric Roberts turns up to collect his pension. Although he was in The Dark Knight, so I will cut him some slack.
Everything else is terrible. The script. The plot. The acting. The screenplay. The direction. The editing. The CGI. The music. All of it objectively bad. Not poor, but really bad.
The worst thing about it is the unstructured, uninteresting meandering nature of the film. It is just a collection of scenes that mean nothing.
The characters and their relationship to each other is non existent.
You always know a bad movie when Eric Roberts turns up to collect his pension. Although he was in The Dark Knight, so I will cut him some slack.
Even in a world where sharknado and its ilk are made, I find it difficult to believe that someone would invest in and produce this.
The "plot" simultaneously is all over the place and goes absolutely nowhere. It is truly baffling that someone paid for this script and said, "I HAVE to make this".
You may think, "Well at least there must be some decent acting in it". You would be incorrect. Small town theaters provide more convincing performances than anyone involved in this delivers.
It is so very bad that I'm almost convinced that someone in charge decided early on that they were going to go for a Razzie or something.
The movie does not even have enough substance to be considered for a Golden Raspberry.
I've seen better things made by kids with cheap equipment on YouTube.
The "plot" simultaneously is all over the place and goes absolutely nowhere. It is truly baffling that someone paid for this script and said, "I HAVE to make this".
You may think, "Well at least there must be some decent acting in it". You would be incorrect. Small town theaters provide more convincing performances than anyone involved in this delivers.
It is so very bad that I'm almost convinced that someone in charge decided early on that they were going to go for a Razzie or something.
The movie does not even have enough substance to be considered for a Golden Raspberry.
I've seen better things made by kids with cheap equipment on YouTube.
In the vast cosmos of science fiction cinema, where imaginative storytelling and visual spectacle often collide, "Lumina" attempts to carve out its own niche. However, it tragically falls short, earning its place in the annals of film history as one of the worst sci-fi movies ever made.
At its core, "Lumina" revolves around a dystopian future where humanity has harnessed a mysterious energy source known as Lumina, which promises to solve the world's energy crisis. Unfortunately, the film's premise is one of its few redeeming qualities. The narrative quickly devolves into a muddled mess, with plot holes so vast they could swallow entire planets. Characters are introduced with little to no development, leaving audiences struggling to connect with their motivations or stakes. The protagonist, a lackluster hero named Zara, played by an uninspired actress, is a prime example of this failure. Her journey from a disillusioned scientist to a reluctant savior feels more like a series of obligatory tropes than a coherent arc.
Visually, "Lumina" is a mixed bag. The film boasts some ambitious set designs and special effects, yet they are undermined by a glaring lack of coherence in execution. The CGI, which could have elevated the film's otherworldly aesthetic, often appears unfinished or poorly integrated. In one particularly egregious scene, a supposed alien landscape looks more like a poorly rendered video game from the early 2000s, pulling viewers out of the narrative and into a realm of unintentional comedy.
The dialogue is another significant flaw, with cringe-worthy lines that are more likely to elicit laughter than emotional engagement. The attempts at philosophical musings on energy consumption and environmentalism feel forced and preachy, lacking the subtlety that great sci-fi often employs to provoke thought. Instead, they come off as hollow platitudes, further distancing the audience from the film's already flimsy narrative.
Despite its shortcomings, "Lumina" does offer a few moments of unintentional humor and absurdity that may appeal to audiences seeking a so-bad-it's-good experience. However, these fleeting moments are not enough to redeem the overall experience.
In conclusion, "Lumina" serves as a cautionary tale about the pitfalls of sci-fi filmmaking. With a weak script, poor character development, and lackluster visuals, it's a film that squanders its potential. While some might find enjoyment in its flaws, for most viewers, it will remain a forgettable entry in the sci-fi genre-an unfortunate reminder that not all journeys through the stars are worth taking.
At its core, "Lumina" revolves around a dystopian future where humanity has harnessed a mysterious energy source known as Lumina, which promises to solve the world's energy crisis. Unfortunately, the film's premise is one of its few redeeming qualities. The narrative quickly devolves into a muddled mess, with plot holes so vast they could swallow entire planets. Characters are introduced with little to no development, leaving audiences struggling to connect with their motivations or stakes. The protagonist, a lackluster hero named Zara, played by an uninspired actress, is a prime example of this failure. Her journey from a disillusioned scientist to a reluctant savior feels more like a series of obligatory tropes than a coherent arc.
Visually, "Lumina" is a mixed bag. The film boasts some ambitious set designs and special effects, yet they are undermined by a glaring lack of coherence in execution. The CGI, which could have elevated the film's otherworldly aesthetic, often appears unfinished or poorly integrated. In one particularly egregious scene, a supposed alien landscape looks more like a poorly rendered video game from the early 2000s, pulling viewers out of the narrative and into a realm of unintentional comedy.
The dialogue is another significant flaw, with cringe-worthy lines that are more likely to elicit laughter than emotional engagement. The attempts at philosophical musings on energy consumption and environmentalism feel forced and preachy, lacking the subtlety that great sci-fi often employs to provoke thought. Instead, they come off as hollow platitudes, further distancing the audience from the film's already flimsy narrative.
Despite its shortcomings, "Lumina" does offer a few moments of unintentional humor and absurdity that may appeal to audiences seeking a so-bad-it's-good experience. However, these fleeting moments are not enough to redeem the overall experience.
In conclusion, "Lumina" serves as a cautionary tale about the pitfalls of sci-fi filmmaking. With a weak script, poor character development, and lackluster visuals, it's a film that squanders its potential. While some might find enjoyment in its flaws, for most viewers, it will remain a forgettable entry in the sci-fi genre-an unfortunate reminder that not all journeys through the stars are worth taking.
Gino McKoy's Lumina is a visually stunning and intellectually engaging sci-fi film. It challenges viewers with its complex narrative and philosophical themes, making it a standout in the genre. The cinematography is gorgeous, and the performances are compelling. While not a film for those seeking fast-paced action, Lumina is perfect for viewers who appreciate a blend of style and substance in their science fiction. Lumina is a remarkable achievement in science fiction cinema. Gino McKoy has crafted a film that is both visually stunning and intellectually challenging, offering a unique and thought-provoking experience. While it may not be for everyone, particularly those who prefer their sci-fi with more action and less introspection.
Le saviez-vous
- AnecdotesThe film underwent a serious period of development hell and the deal for producing the film nearly went up in literal flames. During pre-production, one of the producer's planes crashed due to bad weather into the Colorado mountains and caught on fire upon crashing. Despite receiving severe burns and injuries, the producer miraculously survived and was rescued by firefighters. Among one of the few things to barely survive the crash fire was the producer's paper contract. Following the producer's survival and recovery, production on the film went forward.
- Crédits fousThere is a scene in the end credits.
- ConnexionsReferences Le Magicien d'Oz (1939)
- Bandes originalesE2ME3
composed by Gino McKoy
Meilleurs choix
Connectez-vous pour évaluer et suivre la liste de favoris afin de recevoir des recommandations personnalisées
- How long is Lumina?Alimenté par Alexa
Détails
- Date de sortie
- Pays d’origine
- Sites officiels
- Langue
- Aussi connu sous le nom de
- Kummaline juhtum
- Lieux de tournage
- Marrakech, Maroc(Hotel)
- Société de production
- Voir plus de crédits d'entreprise sur IMDbPro
- Durée1 heure 53 minutes
- Couleur
- Rapport de forme
- 2.39:1
Contribuer à cette page
Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant