Killers of the Flower Moon
Des membres de la tribu Osage aux États-Unis sont assassinés dans des conditions mystérieuses dans les années 1920, donnant lieux à une investigation de grande envergure du FBI impliquant J.... Tout lireDes membres de la tribu Osage aux États-Unis sont assassinés dans des conditions mystérieuses dans les années 1920, donnant lieux à une investigation de grande envergure du FBI impliquant J. Edgar Hoover.Des membres de la tribu Osage aux États-Unis sont assassinés dans des conditions mystérieuses dans les années 1920, donnant lieux à une investigation de grande envergure du FBI impliquant J. Edgar Hoover.
- Réalisation
- Scénario
- Casting principal
- Nommé pour 10 Oscars
- 135 victoires et 421 nominations au total
Janae Collins
- Reta
- (as JaNae Collins)
Résumé
Reviewers say 'Killers of the Flower Moon' is acclaimed for its powerful performances by Lily Gladstone, Leonardo DiCaprio, and Robert De Niro. The film is lauded for its historical significance and emotional depth. However, criticisms include its lengthy runtime, pacing issues, and missed opportunities to explore the Osage Nation's cultural and historical context more deeply. Despite these drawbacks, the cinematography and production values are generally appreciated.
Avis à la une
This is my fifth??? Martin Scorsese movie, so I was expecting to like it since I liked/loved most of his other works. My verdict: yes, I really like this one too. I have to note that the cinema I watched it in had a pretty bad sound system and a few times I couldn't hear characters whispering. So I might rate this even higher on a future rewatch, hopefully on Apple TV soon.
Killers of the Flower Moon is based on a book, which is based on a true and forgotten story of the Osage Nation in the 1920s.
All the cast members really did great, which is an understatement. This is the first I see of Lily Gladstone, and she's just superb. Leonardo di Caprio, my favorite in this movie, is at the top of his game as well, and Robert de Niro is unsurprisingly amazing too. Despite a three-hour run, the story feels well-paced and doesn't really drag much. The story is also really distressing in some parts as well and this might be his most brutal film yet. I really cannot forget it, some of those scenes are still stuck in my mind and still makes me feel a bit emotional. I also love the minimal use of score, makes things feel more...I dunno...raw?
I also love the ending, very creative. I highly recommend for you to watch this.
Killers of the Flower Moon is based on a book, which is based on a true and forgotten story of the Osage Nation in the 1920s.
All the cast members really did great, which is an understatement. This is the first I see of Lily Gladstone, and she's just superb. Leonardo di Caprio, my favorite in this movie, is at the top of his game as well, and Robert de Niro is unsurprisingly amazing too. Despite a three-hour run, the story feels well-paced and doesn't really drag much. The story is also really distressing in some parts as well and this might be his most brutal film yet. I really cannot forget it, some of those scenes are still stuck in my mind and still makes me feel a bit emotional. I also love the minimal use of score, makes things feel more...I dunno...raw?
I also love the ending, very creative. I highly recommend for you to watch this.
I really loved this movie but it simply was way too long. I like long movies, I like slow cinema but there is still the concept of economy or story telling. I wish he would allow himself to "kill his darlings" and cut like almost an hour out of this. One of his justifications is that people "sit and binge tv shows for 4-5 hours" but it's not at all the same. The form and structure of television and film are completely different, he knows that. It really just feels like self indulgence because he's at the end of his career and nobody is going to tell him no. Self indulgence is the death of a lot of great artist once they find success. Particularly Scorsese, all of his most respected films (maybe with the exception of casino) even if they had a slightly longer run-time were completely trimmed of fat. Every shot, every line has a point in advancing the plot and was very economical. This adaptation felt like it made all the mistakes of adapting from a novel to film. I would absolutely love an edit of this film that is maybe 2 hours long and could easily been done. It would have been more emotionally impactful, interesting and still honored the story and the people it was about. The Osage, which was definitely the most interesting part of the film. But gets swept up in a stale courtroom drama that we've seen a million times and could have been a couple of short scenes.
This is a very good movie, but it could have been told in an hour less. The material is grim, but I guess that's part of the story telling.
I can't understand why this couldn't have been done in 2 hours. The plot didn't warrant it, and the acting almost held it up. But we could all see where this was going.
The court sequence was way too long and muddled the nature of the story. Is it an historical account of what happened to these poor people? Is it a story about duplicity in a relationship? Is it about greed and human nature? Is it about psychopaths? Or a court room drama?
For me, it would have been an 8/10 if it didn't drag on unnecessarily. Great acting. Great story. Just drawn out.
I can't understand why this couldn't have been done in 2 hours. The plot didn't warrant it, and the acting almost held it up. But we could all see where this was going.
The court sequence was way too long and muddled the nature of the story. Is it an historical account of what happened to these poor people? Is it a story about duplicity in a relationship? Is it about greed and human nature? Is it about psychopaths? Or a court room drama?
For me, it would have been an 8/10 if it didn't drag on unnecessarily. Great acting. Great story. Just drawn out.
The film is ultimately hampered by its miscasting and excessive length.
Leonardo DiCaprio and Robert De Niro are both undeniably talented actors, but they are simply too old to play their respective roles. DiCaprio is 47 years old, but he is supposed to be playing a man in his early 30s. De Niro is 79 years old, and he is supposed to be playing a man in his early 60s. The age difference is distracting and makes it difficult to believe in their characters.
The film's runtime of 206 minutes is also excessive. The story could have easily been told in 2.5 hours or less. The film's slow pace and meandering plot make it feel much longer than it actually is.
Leonardo DiCaprio and Robert De Niro are both undeniably talented actors, but they are simply too old to play their respective roles. DiCaprio is 47 years old, but he is supposed to be playing a man in his early 30s. De Niro is 79 years old, and he is supposed to be playing a man in his early 60s. The age difference is distracting and makes it difficult to believe in their characters.
The film's runtime of 206 minutes is also excessive. The story could have easily been told in 2.5 hours or less. The film's slow pace and meandering plot make it feel much longer than it actually is.
I never heard of Osage Nation before this. It was a 3 hour 26 minute education not just of the oil wealth and of American Indian culture but of sensitive filmmaking crafted so beautifully Michelangelo would have cried. Lily Gladstone has a classic, timeless, renaissance Madonna face and Robbie Robertson's tender score embellished her sensitive performance perfectly. True to Mr Scorsese's form, it ran so long and needed a deus ex machine ending that while innovative, brought (for me) the film to a premature end. Dessert was served too soon. Otherwise, I could not say a bad thing about this show. Mr Scorsese, I wish you a very long life so you can continue your master craft for mere mortals like me for a long time to come.
What Scorsese Film Ranks Highest on IMDb?
What Scorsese Film Ranks Highest on IMDb?
Cinema legend Martin Scorsese has directed some of the most acclaimed films of all time. See how IMDb users rank all of his feature films as director.
Le saviez-vous
- AnecdotesThe case in Osage County was the first investigation presented to the newly-formed Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI). It was led by J. Edgar Hoover, whom Leonardo DiCaprio portrayed in J. Edgar (2011).
- GaffesAt the end of William Hale spanking Ernest Burkhart, Robert De Niro hits Leonardo DiCaprio so hard that the paddle breaks, with a splintered crack in the middle of the paddle. An indication that this was accidental comes with De Niro attempting to hide it behind his leg, while the next scene has an unbroken paddle placed on the floor against the podium.
- Citations
Ernest Burkhart: I don't know what you said, but it must've been Indian for "handsome devil".
- Versions alternativesThe Australian theatrical version was cut for an M rating, given on 9 Oct 2023. The uncut version was previously rated MA15+ on 5 Sep 2023. Based on the two classifications, 'strong injury detail' was removed or replaced to obtain the new, more accessible rating.
- Bandes originalesBull Doze Blues
Written by Henry Thomas
Performed by Henry Thomas
Courtesy of Document Records
Meilleurs choix
Connectez-vous pour évaluer et suivre la liste de favoris afin de recevoir des recommandations personnalisées
Détails
- Date de sortie
- Pays d’origine
- Langues
- Aussi connu sous le nom de
- Los asesinos de la luna
- Lieux de tournage
- Sociétés de production
- Voir plus de crédits d'entreprise sur IMDbPro
Box-office
- Budget
- 200 000 000 $US (estimé)
- Montant brut aux États-Unis et au Canada
- 68 035 488 $US
- Week-end de sortie aux États-Unis et au Canada
- 23 253 655 $US
- 22 oct. 2023
- Montant brut mondial
- 158 772 599 $US
- Durée3 heures 26 minutes
- Couleur
- Mixage
- Rapport de forme
- 2.39 : 1
Contribuer à cette page
Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant