NOTE IMDb
4,8/10
3,4 k
MA NOTE
Dans une zone de quarantaine infestée de zombies à East Mission City, le journaliste d'investigation Chase Carter doit mettre fin à une conspiration secrète du gouvernement.Dans une zone de quarantaine infestée de zombies à East Mission City, le journaliste d'investigation Chase Carter doit mettre fin à une conspiration secrète du gouvernement.Dans une zone de quarantaine infestée de zombies à East Mission City, le journaliste d'investigation Chase Carter doit mettre fin à une conspiration secrète du gouvernement.
- Réalisation
- Scénario
- Casting principal
- Récompenses
- 2 victoires et 4 nominations au total
Avis à la une
If you enjoyed the first one, I think you will enjoy this one as well. It's about the same quality etc. I didn't personally jump or get scared, but few movies do that to me anyhow.
2 out of 5 stars.
Dead Rising Endgame is a disappointing sequel to the action zombie genre. Worst than the first movie. First of all the plot is boring. About a government conspiracy and cover ups with the zombrex chips. While the good guys have to travel into a quarantined infected city to stop there servers. Yes. Some things do get left open. Maybe for another sequel. It also lacks the action than the first. But when Chase does fight against zombies. It does get entertaining and creative for those rare moments. Especially during the escalators scene. Also a new addition is the zombies are faster and stronger which makes it a little exciting. The acting has yet to improve. The script and direction is filled with bad dialogue. Slow and boring direction with its sub plot. And uneven pacing. I hope they get to reboot the adaptations and make better movies out of them.
Dead Rising Endgame is a disappointing sequel to the action zombie genre. Worst than the first movie. First of all the plot is boring. About a government conspiracy and cover ups with the zombrex chips. While the good guys have to travel into a quarantined infected city to stop there servers. Yes. Some things do get left open. Maybe for another sequel. It also lacks the action than the first. But when Chase does fight against zombies. It does get entertaining and creative for those rare moments. Especially during the escalators scene. Also a new addition is the zombies are faster and stronger which makes it a little exciting. The acting has yet to improve. The script and direction is filled with bad dialogue. Slow and boring direction with its sub plot. And uneven pacing. I hope they get to reboot the adaptations and make better movies out of them.
Picking up 2 years after the events in Wachtower, Chase has been discredited, trying to redeem himself continues his investigation aided by new allies. Television series veteran director Pat Williams infuses better pacing. Stylish camera shots, yet somehow it never rises above that feeling of a TV movie of the week. Jesse Metcalfe shows of his action hero chops taking on faster moving Zombies. Billy Zane is wasted as a evil Scientist his scenes are few. Throughout there's this feeling that something is missing, in some ways it's better than the first in other ways it fails overall it's still above your acreage zombie movie. I might need to watch it again, I gave the first an 8 giving this sequel a 7 mainly because it the only improvement is in style and pacing.
The first time Dead Rising transitioned into cinema was not met with critical acclaimed, but at least it has familiarity with the game's brash and quirky nature. This time around, it delves right back into zombie infested world using a lot of action movie settings, but surprisingly slim on action itself. It takes itself seriously with predicaments and characters audience would barely care about.
Story continues along with the group of journalists who stumbles on a government secret. The characters from the first movie are not that memorable and as they are dropped into hot zone straight away, there's no connection with audience, especially since they seem to squabble on every issues. The silly antics from the game are almost buried, which is ironic since that is the main draw, not the conspiracy thriller.
Cinematography looks bland, with occasional cool shots before more dialogues transpire blandly, even then it only looks like ordinary city scenery. It doesn't convey the hectic atmosphere for infected world. Action is thin as well, only occurring about halfway through and not that lengthy or well-choreographed either.
The sequel not only lost its core foundation, it strays too far into thriller with ill-equipped script and characterization.
Story continues along with the group of journalists who stumbles on a government secret. The characters from the first movie are not that memorable and as they are dropped into hot zone straight away, there's no connection with audience, especially since they seem to squabble on every issues. The silly antics from the game are almost buried, which is ironic since that is the main draw, not the conspiracy thriller.
Cinematography looks bland, with occasional cool shots before more dialogues transpire blandly, even then it only looks like ordinary city scenery. It doesn't convey the hectic atmosphere for infected world. Action is thin as well, only occurring about halfway through and not that lengthy or well-choreographed either.
The sequel not only lost its core foundation, it strays too far into thriller with ill-equipped script and characterization.
Fifteen minutes into this wasteland and first question popped out - How - or why - does junk like this get produced and actually make any money?
Boring and predictable plot quickly wears thin and gave easy odds on how soon we would bail out of this film. We made it to the 65 minute mark.
For those excited about the first movie, this sequel didn't do anything new or exciting - more stupid characters doing predictably stupid things.
We had the ability to fast forward on this (and we used it!) in the hopes of it getting better - it doesn't.
So many zombies where getting offed in predictable ways it seemed like a game of marathon Whack-a-Zombie. You lost track after the first 50 zombies.
Too much gratuitous profanity, too many characters without depth, all making it hard to care for any of the characters.
Skip this one - hundreds of better zombie flicks out there!
You been warned.
Boring and predictable plot quickly wears thin and gave easy odds on how soon we would bail out of this film. We made it to the 65 minute mark.
For those excited about the first movie, this sequel didn't do anything new or exciting - more stupid characters doing predictably stupid things.
We had the ability to fast forward on this (and we used it!) in the hopes of it getting better - it doesn't.
So many zombies where getting offed in predictable ways it seemed like a game of marathon Whack-a-Zombie. You lost track after the first 50 zombies.
Too much gratuitous profanity, too many characters without depth, all making it hard to care for any of the characters.
Skip this one - hundreds of better zombie flicks out there!
You been warned.
Le saviez-vous
- AnecdotesThe film's sequel was announced a month later after Dead Rising (2015).
- GaffesAt the beginning of the movie when you had the two women in the surveillance van, you can see traffic moving freely at the intersection behind them.
Which is because they are actually waiting outside of the Quarantine Zone. That is evident when they are picking up Chase who has just left the QZ.
- ConnexionsFollows Dead Rising (2015)
Meilleurs choix
Connectez-vous pour évaluer et suivre la liste de favoris afin de recevoir des recommandations personnalisées
- How long is Dead Rising: Endgame?Alimenté par Alexa
Détails
- Date de sortie
- Pays d’origine
- Site officiel
- Langue
- Aussi connu sous le nom de
- Uzdizanje mrtvih 2: Kraj igre
- Lieux de tournage
- Sociétés de production
- Voir plus de crédits d'entreprise sur IMDbPro
- Durée1 heure 36 minutes
- Couleur
- Rapport de forme
- 2.35 : 1
Contribuer à cette page
Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant
Lacune principale
By what name was Dead Rising: Endgame (2016) officially released in Canada in English?
Répondre