Un médecin prospère qui a perdu son petit frère lors d'une agression liée à un gang abandonne sa vie privilégiée pour devenir un guerrier masqué et venger la mort de son frère.Un médecin prospère qui a perdu son petit frère lors d'une agression liée à un gang abandonne sa vie privilégiée pour devenir un guerrier masqué et venger la mort de son frère.Un médecin prospère qui a perdu son petit frère lors d'une agression liée à un gang abandonne sa vie privilégiée pour devenir un guerrier masqué et venger la mort de son frère.
- Réalisation
- Scénario
- Casting principal
- Récompenses
- 7 victoires et 19 nominations au total
Jacob Lohmann
- Torben
- (as Jakob Ulrik Lohmann)
Avis à la une
Director and Writer " Fenar Ahmed" have made a Clever , Solide Action, Dark Thrill and a pinch Drama. Great Work!
7,3/10 ;)
7,3/10 ;)
THOROUGHLY enjoyed this movie.
For me it wasn't about the "predictability" of the film.... nor was it about the "modern-day revenge" theme as indicated by others.
For me it was all about the back-story.... the story behind the apparent tale. oh yeah.... very current... and very valid in today's society....
For me it was all about the back-story.... the story behind the apparent tale. oh yeah.... very current... and very valid in today's society....
I'm closer to Thobias on this one.
Sure, it's an easy watch, quick and stylish to a fault, and certainly raises highly pertinent questions about Danish (or any OECD) society.
But I found that the script didn't take anywhere near enough effort to make it plausible. So, here we have this highly integrated professional, Dr Jekyll, with a great marriage. He's consciously walked away from his culture and ethnicity, goes out of his way to abuse his poor old dad for being mentally stuck in Iraq.
Then, on behalf of a loser brother he doesn't even like, he suddenly turns into Mr Hyde on steroids? The only partial explanation we're offered is guilt, but it didn't wash for me.
Sure, it's an easy watch, quick and stylish to a fault, and certainly raises highly pertinent questions about Danish (or any OECD) society.
But I found that the script didn't take anywhere near enough effort to make it plausible. So, here we have this highly integrated professional, Dr Jekyll, with a great marriage. He's consciously walked away from his culture and ethnicity, goes out of his way to abuse his poor old dad for being mentally stuck in Iraq.
Then, on behalf of a loser brother he doesn't even like, he suddenly turns into Mr Hyde on steroids? The only partial explanation we're offered is guilt, but it didn't wash for me.
This is a great movie. It's very realistic, not just like other movies where one guy is beating hundreds of bad guys. In this Movie also the bad guys are punching back. It's a great story which shows the side effects of revenge.
It's nice how the movie deals with the violence and verbal attacks of criminals now a days. There is no honor or respect in this generation.
It's nice how the movie deals with the violence and verbal attacks of criminals now a days. There is no honor or respect in this generation.
Nice camera work shot beautifully on a Danish setting, cold, wet and dreary weather condition in blueish sharp tint. With such nice cinematography, the movie is supposed to be very good, but regretfully, the lousy script with poor directing sequences from the very beginning has narrowed the film into a mediocre predictable one-way street.
The heavily flawed screenplay and its storyline could be spotted a mile away from the very beginning within 5 minutes:
1) A prearranged traffic accident on a crossroad, with two cars collided and crashed in a city center was pretty good trick to divert everybody to focus on the accident, allowing the bank robbery to be carried out without anybody on the street paying attention; a good touch here but simply failed to justify a robbery with only one carry-on bag, even its full of money, it might be able to cover the values of two crashed cars. Or, did that car crash get nothing to do with the bank robbery but an unpredictable real traffic accident?
2) Robbing a bank with a bright shinny orange-red carry-on bag? How stupid it could be?
3) The robber, the younger brother of a medical doctor, ran away from the bank on a motorbike through a city sidewalk, how stupid it was! Then out of the blue, a police cruiser suddenly appeared from nowhere and started to chase him with no sirens blasted loudly. WTF?! Was the money he robbed and stuffed into his bag had some micro electronic GPS device that could alert the police to follow him with such ease? What a stupid lousy script, absolutely ridiculous!
If a film started with such a stupid and illogic beginning, from the first scene to the next couple of minutes' development, it was doomed, like a still-born child, no breath, no burst of a first cry, eyes totally shut, no body heat, and this film was dead as a still-born from the very beginning.
I don't think what I write here got anything to do with "Sproiler" at all, because what I point out here is just at the beginning of this mediocre film, badly scripted and blindly directed.
The heavily flawed screenplay and its storyline could be spotted a mile away from the very beginning within 5 minutes:
1) A prearranged traffic accident on a crossroad, with two cars collided and crashed in a city center was pretty good trick to divert everybody to focus on the accident, allowing the bank robbery to be carried out without anybody on the street paying attention; a good touch here but simply failed to justify a robbery with only one carry-on bag, even its full of money, it might be able to cover the values of two crashed cars. Or, did that car crash get nothing to do with the bank robbery but an unpredictable real traffic accident?
2) Robbing a bank with a bright shinny orange-red carry-on bag? How stupid it could be?
3) The robber, the younger brother of a medical doctor, ran away from the bank on a motorbike through a city sidewalk, how stupid it was! Then out of the blue, a police cruiser suddenly appeared from nowhere and started to chase him with no sirens blasted loudly. WTF?! Was the money he robbed and stuffed into his bag had some micro electronic GPS device that could alert the police to follow him with such ease? What a stupid lousy script, absolutely ridiculous!
If a film started with such a stupid and illogic beginning, from the first scene to the next couple of minutes' development, it was doomed, like a still-born child, no breath, no burst of a first cry, eyes totally shut, no body heat, and this film was dead as a still-born from the very beginning.
I don't think what I write here got anything to do with "Sproiler" at all, because what I point out here is just at the beginning of this mediocre film, badly scripted and blindly directed.
Le saviez-vous
- AnecdotesDirector and writer Fenar Ahmad has admitted that a real life experience where his own brother got 'into trouble' inspired him to make this film.
- ConnexionsFollowed by Darkland Undercover (2023)
Meilleurs choix
Connectez-vous pour évaluer et suivre la liste de favoris afin de recevoir des recommandations personnalisées
- How long is Darkland?Alimenté par Alexa
Détails
- Date de sortie
- Pays d’origine
- Sites officiels
- Langues
- Aussi connu sous le nom de
- Karanlık Şehir
- Lieux de tournage
- Gemini Residence, Islands Brygge, Copenhague, Danemark(Zaid's apartment)
- Sociétés de production
- Voir plus de crédits d'entreprise sur IMDbPro
Box-office
- Montant brut mondial
- 20 827 $US
- Durée
- 1h 52min(112 min)
- Couleur
- Mixage
- Rapport de forme
- 2.35 : 1
- 2.39:1
Contribuer à cette page
Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant