NOTE IMDb
7,4/10
4,2 k
MA NOTE
Ajouter une intrigue dans votre langueA journalist who intends to write an article on traffic rule breakers gets dragged into a whirlpool of murder cases and deception.A journalist who intends to write an article on traffic rule breakers gets dragged into a whirlpool of murder cases and deception.A journalist who intends to write an article on traffic rule breakers gets dragged into a whirlpool of murder cases and deception.
- Réalisation
- Scénario
- Casting principal
- Récompenses
- 3 victoires et 7 nominations au total
Radhika Narayan
- Maya
- (as Radhika Chetan)
Dileep Raj
- Aditya
- (as Dilip Raj)
Skanda Ashok
- Ritesh
- (as Skanda)
Ram Manjjonaath
- Police Constable Muddanna
- (as Rramprasadd Banavara)
Avis à la une
8/10..Thanks Pawan Kumar for bringing the much-needed road-safety message hard-hittingly and convincingly in a very innovative way from your movie 'U-Turn'. Being a Kannadiga, I am ashamed to say that when driving on roads and following traffic rules, Bengalureans behavior is most inhumane, indiscipline, inconsiderate and insensitively rash especially bikers then cabs, small trucks, buses...And this rhetoric is coming from who have experience living in top metro cities across world. Even the most populated and impoverished Mexico City drivers follow traffic rules at their best. Looking at Bengaluru mad and chaotic traffic, it is hard to defend foreigners calling India a shxtty hole. It is shocking that India renews its Guinness records for having most number of road accidents and deaths in world every year. About 15 lakhs Indians have died in last 10 years and in Bengaluru alone, I believe 10-20 people die every day, mostly bikers again. Bengaluru 'Adjust Madi' attitude on roads is wiping out people mainly youth.
About 'U-Turn' movie qualities, it is good but not up to expectations of 'RangiTaranga', 'KendaSampige' or even Pawan Kumar's own 'Lucia'.
Pros -
1. Good road-safety message delivered to society especially the much needed one for Bengalureans.
2. Innovative storytelling with good thrilling elements.
3. Technically decent - sleek direction, good screenplay, decent background score and editing.
4. I personally felt the climax is good, contrary to popular verdict, as I have experienced and heard about similar paranormal happenings in life.
Cons -
1. Movie felt predictable with mystery elements given away with unnecessary special effects before murders.
2. Protagonist actress Shraddha's Kannada pronunciation was not up to mark. Her expressions felt similar in most scenes lacking shades and micro-expressions.
3. Acting by most actors felt flat and routine even in some intense scenes e.g. post jeep and jail murders the actors expressions lacked intensity , fear and depth.
4. Over usage of Kanglish (Kannada with English) in conversations and impractical American words (viz. Homicide for Murder, Cheque for Bill) in Indian culture should have been avoided.
5. Some scenes were not convincing e.g. a beggar residing on flyover and that too watching over people whole time looks filmy.
6. Movie felt hastily shot with minimal budget with sincerity lacking in some places.
7. Inclusion of few preachy scenes on traffic safety would have been good.
Despite the flaws, 'U-Turn' should be watched by everyone for its innovative storytelling and convincing social message on road safety.
About 'U-Turn' movie qualities, it is good but not up to expectations of 'RangiTaranga', 'KendaSampige' or even Pawan Kumar's own 'Lucia'.
Pros -
1. Good road-safety message delivered to society especially the much needed one for Bengalureans.
2. Innovative storytelling with good thrilling elements.
3. Technically decent - sleek direction, good screenplay, decent background score and editing.
4. I personally felt the climax is good, contrary to popular verdict, as I have experienced and heard about similar paranormal happenings in life.
Cons -
1. Movie felt predictable with mystery elements given away with unnecessary special effects before murders.
2. Protagonist actress Shraddha's Kannada pronunciation was not up to mark. Her expressions felt similar in most scenes lacking shades and micro-expressions.
3. Acting by most actors felt flat and routine even in some intense scenes e.g. post jeep and jail murders the actors expressions lacked intensity , fear and depth.
4. Over usage of Kanglish (Kannada with English) in conversations and impractical American words (viz. Homicide for Murder, Cheque for Bill) in Indian culture should have been avoided.
5. Some scenes were not convincing e.g. a beggar residing on flyover and that too watching over people whole time looks filmy.
6. Movie felt hastily shot with minimal budget with sincerity lacking in some places.
7. Inclusion of few preachy scenes on traffic safety would have been good.
Despite the flaws, 'U-Turn' should be watched by everyone for its innovative storytelling and convincing social message on road safety.
We see umpteen traffic breaks on b'lore roads everyday – but have you seen a U-Turn which went wrong big time ? Pawan Kumar (of 'Lucia' fame) narrates a gripping tale of Double-road flyover in his style. "U- turn" (with English subtitles) is about an ambitious intern journalist craving for excellence in her field. How the story unfolds
.. ?? Naaaaaaaaaaaa – why should I have all the fun ? Take a break and see the story unfold on big screen :-) Cinematography and BGM – These are the make/break areas of any suspense flick, and they have been well taken care of to deliver chills to the audience. Performances – Pawan Kumar has hit bull's eye again in terms of casting. The protagonist (Shraddha Srinath) is impressive and so are the supporting characters (including Roger Narayan of Hollywood fame) who deliver convincingly. Screenplay, Editing & Direction – Kudos to the young director for venturing into this genre and delivering it yet again. The story & screenplay is well-crafted and engaging, especially, the 1st half keeps the suspense intact and audience guessing (similar to the movie's trailer). Editing is crisp and straightforward, without any unwanted footage annoying the viewers. Minuses: The 2nd half is a bit predictable and unraveling of an important twist may not go too well with a few. Verdict: A lesson well-conveyed through a mysterious tale – a suspense thriller not to be missed by the Bengalureans !!
"It may not be the best from Pawan(director of lucia) but his making style is really good and message was rightly portrayed which makes it a good horror mystery thriller film with social message.'U-Turn' should be watched by everyone for its innovative storytelling and convincing social message on road safety"
Positives- 1.)Direction and script- Pawan who earlier directed lucia was excellent movie which i rated 5 out of 5 but if i compare with this film then it may not be that great. He was trying to add horror thriller to a social message driven film which may have its flaws but he did a different attempt and i must appreciate him for that. Script was engaging along with direction.
2.)Shradda srinath , roger narayan and dilip raj- These 3 actors portrayed their roles properly and out of them shradda was outstanding and she was able to bring out those emotions perfectly without any flaws. Roger narayan as inspector was right choice by director. Dilip raj was fine.
3.)cinematography and edits 4.)Bg score 5.)Message about road safety was rightly conveyed.
Negatives- 1.)Cliches in second half - First half went with introduction of characters and that was fine. But second half the director's vision of portraying certain elements had flaws and it disturbed the experience. Director could have taken care of that to avoid this type of mistakes.
2.)Predictability- Because of certain cliché'd scenes it was predictable for audience which spoiled the experience of mystery thriller.
Is it a must watch? Yes it is a must watch film and it has a great social message. It is a innovative movie on road safety.
Overall- Despite flaws Its a good film if you check the overall aspect. It could have been better if director had rechecked some scenes to avoid some errors. But its fine if you not go with high expectations. It tells about the mysterious events that occur on the double road flyover with great social message added to it. I recommend you to watch it but without much expectations.
My rating- 4/5(Brilliant Mystery Thriller and one of the best movie's of 2016)
Positives- 1.)Direction and script- Pawan who earlier directed lucia was excellent movie which i rated 5 out of 5 but if i compare with this film then it may not be that great. He was trying to add horror thriller to a social message driven film which may have its flaws but he did a different attempt and i must appreciate him for that. Script was engaging along with direction.
2.)Shradda srinath , roger narayan and dilip raj- These 3 actors portrayed their roles properly and out of them shradda was outstanding and she was able to bring out those emotions perfectly without any flaws. Roger narayan as inspector was right choice by director. Dilip raj was fine.
3.)cinematography and edits 4.)Bg score 5.)Message about road safety was rightly conveyed.
Negatives- 1.)Cliches in second half - First half went with introduction of characters and that was fine. But second half the director's vision of portraying certain elements had flaws and it disturbed the experience. Director could have taken care of that to avoid this type of mistakes.
2.)Predictability- Because of certain cliché'd scenes it was predictable for audience which spoiled the experience of mystery thriller.
Is it a must watch? Yes it is a must watch film and it has a great social message. It is a innovative movie on road safety.
Overall- Despite flaws Its a good film if you check the overall aspect. It could have been better if director had rechecked some scenes to avoid some errors. But its fine if you not go with high expectations. It tells about the mysterious events that occur on the double road flyover with great social message added to it. I recommend you to watch it but without much expectations.
My rating- 4/5(Brilliant Mystery Thriller and one of the best movie's of 2016)
So the beginning of the movie was promising and i was excited to know what happens further on. But somewhere in the middle it was clear that there will be some supernatural powers involved and the plot became predictable. Still there were some twists in the end but they didnt add much tension to the film, mabye the one at the end, which was inspired by a real incident. It was a certainly a decent movie, not perfect, the acting was really good and the camera technique also executed well. For a movie evening with friends or Family this movie is def. a good choice.
Between Stuttgart is not nice ;)
Good Kannada movies are hard to come by. This one alone can move the needle quite a bit to the high side.
I will not reveal plots. Except for some shaky scripting in the last few minutes, the movie is remarkably watchable.
I will not reveal plots. Except for some shaky scripting in the last few minutes, the movie is remarkably watchable.
Le saviez-vous
- AnecdotesThe director of the film, Pawan Kumar dubbed his voice for one of the charactets.
- GaffesRachana's cellphone keeps changing from a Moto G, to a One + One to a Nexus 5 through out the film.
- ConnexionsRemade as Careful (2017)
- Bandes originalesKarma Karma
Music composed by Poornachandra Tejaswi
Music Arrangement by Monish Kumar
(Opening scene, with aerial shots by Arvind S Kashyap)
Meilleurs choix
Connectez-vous pour évaluer et suivre la liste de favoris afin de recevoir des recommandations personnalisées
- How long is U Turn?Alimenté par Alexa
Détails
- Durée2 heures
- Couleur
- Rapport de forme
- 2.35 : 1
- 2.39 : 1
Contribuer à cette page
Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant