Indivisibili

Dasy and Viola (Angela and Marianna Fontana) are twin sisters on the verge of turning 18. They are blessed with beautiful voices and are sought after to sing at weddings, communions and baptisms. Their real draw is another trait which cloaks them in fascinating charm: they are conjoined twins.

Let us reflect for a moment on the broad history of conjoined twins in film. We have Tod Browning's "Freaks" (1932) and Harry Fraser's "Chained for Life" (1952), both starring the Hilton sisters (who, not coincidentally, have the names Violet and Daisy much like the girls in this movie). In both cases, the intent was to shock or to exploit. In 2003, we got the comedy "Stuck on You", which found this unfortunate birth defect something to be laughed at.

"Indivisible" is more bold than any of these. Rather than use the handicap to shock, exploit or poke fun, we get a very human set of twins, who are no different than you or me beyond that one thing (and we all have our unique features). Granted, the "conjoined" aspect here is relatively minor, and one has to wonder why they could not be separated at birth. But nitpick aside, we finally get to see two people who must share their lives without it being a spectacle.

The unusual factor in this story is not the twins themselves, but the way people around them see the girls as objects rather than people. There is an odd rejection by both their father and their priest (a very "cool" Gianfranco Gallo) when a doctor suggests that surgery is possible. We are left wondering at this point if their father truly loves them or merely sees them as income, a way to escape the crippling poverty of their community. The priest, likewise, strongly suggests people would not see the girls perform if they were separate... the crowd loves the gimmick, not their voices. We have to wonder: is he concerned about their success as performers, or his own connection to their success (they appear at his baptisms, weddings and first communions). No one seems to care about what the girls themselves think, want or feel. (One could argue this is a commentary on women in society, but this is likely unintentional.)

Perhaps most interesting of all is the fact the two girls see their own situation in different ways. One wants to live her own life, but the other is far too attached (no pun intended). The latter is hard to sympathize with, especially when we see what sort of romantic interludes can happen... physical encounters that leave one sister in the most awkward place possible. (Real-life conjoined twins have indeed had spouses and even children, so we can only imagine how this hurdle is overcome.)

Deborah Young with the Hollywood Reporter makes an interesting observation. She points out how the film takes place in the region around Naples, home of the camorra (a Mafia-like entity), and yet the first contains no violence (other than a tense scene on a yacht). When not watching film, my day job is writing books on organized crime, and yet this never occurred to me. A film can be set in Naples without the camorra, just as a film can be set in Sicily without the Mafia. Hopefully Italy is seen as more than just a criminal stereotype.

"Indivisible" is not your average film. Both heart-warming and heart-breaking, it ventures into the offbeat and unusual without ever becoming exploitation or B-movie material. While viewers are likely to sympathize with one sister over the other, we cannot help but see things from both sides. The film is currently playing in New York City and opens theatrically in Los Angeles September 29, 2017. A national release will follow at your finer theaters.

2 young conjoined twin sisters live their life as local scene freaky phenomenon and singing stars, managed by their ignorant and irresponsible parents. As they grow up one of them starts questioning their situation and the fragile balance falls apart.

Let's start with what I found to be the weak point of the movie: the script. One of the main characters (the "impresario" Gaetano Bruno who does a good job with what he's provided with) is unbelievable and his plot line is too predictable simply for the sake of the drama. Unfortunately this is only the major example: a lot of times a great acting performance barely covers the weakness of the context in which the plot throws the actors.

If you can deal with this, you will experience a sweet love story and you will see the appalling conditions in which people still live in one of the "advanced economies" of the world.

Good photography and very good music choices: a couple of songs from Neapolitan songwriter Enzo Avitabile are as decadent and beautiful as it gets.

A fictionalized story of conjoined late teen female twins who besides having their beauty as an asset also have good singing voices. In Italy they make appearances at various events to sing and to be touched which may sound odd, but if you're quite religious & superstitious (redundant) that act could bring good fortune; solve problems. Story loosely based on an actual pair of early 1900s twins named Daisy & Violet Hilton, but set in the present. Like many conjoined (Siamese twins is a misnomer) twins their income is partly from media or sideshow performances; sometimes being misused as it appears in this movie. The lower rating is not from the acting which was superb, but for the various implausible holes in the scenarios for the girls.

The story revolves around the 2 twins which are local stars both in feasts and the local, ex-catholic community (the director himself says this strange priest is an ex-priest, so...). Daisy wants to be free; Viola is very afraid of what such future will be.. the real reason to watch the movie is these first timers performances: they are just about perfect, either in the more intense scenes (perfect) or the more banal ones; they bring it home.

-The drama is not overplayed;

-the scenes are not cheap shots to the audience's emotions;

-the characters are conflicted, rich, not one dimensional;

-the message is not too obvious and may be read in many metaphorical ways;

-the direction is smart but not too artsy or headache inducing;

-yes there is beauty in the images (a throwback to some of Fellini's work);

-this is a movie probably suited for people over 13 (some sexual content, nothing serious);

-this could have been nominated for best non English language movie Oscar, but they went with "Fuocoammare", the politically correct movie on refugees (Sorrentino criticized this openly in Italy); -you owe it to yourself to watch this and avoid the crap they pass for cinema these days (give me another remake Hollywood, please!).

8 stars and I guarantee I am not close to anyone in the movie: I just had to write a review (my first here, after many years as a member) since there was none.

Go see it, for the sake of cinema that moves forward...

P. S.(edit): I am not sure why they would put the warning "this review may contain spoilers" on my review but I guess they just did it anyway...