NOTE IMDb
2,1/10
1,6 k
MA NOTE
Ajouter une intrigue dans votre langueA private investigator must unravel the murder of her uncle while keeping the secret that she is a descendant from a line of werewolves.A private investigator must unravel the murder of her uncle while keeping the secret that she is a descendant from a line of werewolves.A private investigator must unravel the murder of her uncle while keeping the secret that she is a descendant from a line of werewolves.
- Réalisation
- Scénario
- Casting principal
Avis à la une
I am actually a fan of B movies but this was an F movie it was just all out BAD. But if u plan on watching a terrible movie to make fun of this one will do the trick.
Absolute trash! Art work on the case is totally misleading and the best part of the film , Lohan is an 'and' to the feature, very poor production values, terrible acting and a unnecessary overcomplicated weak plot.
It has a quite high budget that i can only assume the heads enjoyed themselves with expenses as it certainly doesn't show in the film production.
If you like your low budget weak film that can be picked up for under a $1 this is a must for you.
In a word to sum up this film ..... excrement
Yes I have felt embarrassed to watch it...so disgraceful acting, story, editing, clue.....it is a mystery how the could have done such a awful "movie"..... shame of you......change your job making movies and acting is not for yous.....accept it.
First I should mention that I got to see this with two friends for free - if you search in the right spot and add "Lifetime movie" to the title you will find that someone has already pirated this piece of dross onto the internet.
This will never become a cult classic since it's not "awful but funny", it's just plain awful. The plot is impossible to follow, the actors are amateurish and some are downright impossible to understand, the lighting is abominable, werewolves and vampires come and go for no discernible reason, there's no continuity between scenes and . . . well I could go on but why bother.
And then there's this, what is the need of a smoke machine for an interior scene?
Since Lindsay Lohan is the only recognizable name in the cast(except maybe Charlotte Beckett), let's talk a bit about her performance:
Now let's talk about what's good about the film, or at least what didn't repulse me, and that would be the aforementioned Charlotte Beckett. She's pretty, she looks good in black, she's a passable actress who doesn't need to read her lines off of a large piece of markerboard. That's about it.
To sum it up, this will never be a cult favorite but it could be the final wooden stake in the heart of Lohan's career. On the other hand, that Saudi Arabian production of Lohan starring in an all female film about an American woman who comes to teach a harem about God knows what sounds intriguing (said no one, ever.)
This will never become a cult classic since it's not "awful but funny", it's just plain awful. The plot is impossible to follow, the actors are amateurish and some are downright impossible to understand, the lighting is abominable, werewolves and vampires come and go for no discernible reason, there's no continuity between scenes and . . . well I could go on but why bother.
And then there's this, what is the need of a smoke machine for an interior scene?
Since Lindsay Lohan is the only recognizable name in the cast(except maybe Charlotte Beckett), let's talk a bit about her performance:
- She delivers every line in a flat, gravely voice.
- Her eyes dart to the left and right as she reads her lines.
- I'm going to guess she blew off coming in every day after a while. In some scenes, it's obvious that they just put her in front of a green screen and spliced her in with actors who already filmed the scene without her.
- There are actually times when there's a body double who neither looks or sounds like Lohan reading her lines. BTW, this is not a bad thing since the anonymous person is a more convincing actress than Lohan.
- The only good thing is she's not in a whole lot of the film, at least for the 50 minutes or so that I managed to watch this.
Now let's talk about what's good about the film, or at least what didn't repulse me, and that would be the aforementioned Charlotte Beckett. She's pretty, she looks good in black, she's a passable actress who doesn't need to read her lines off of a large piece of markerboard. That's about it.
To sum it up, this will never be a cult favorite but it could be the final wooden stake in the heart of Lohan's career. On the other hand, that Saudi Arabian production of Lohan starring in an all female film about an American woman who comes to teach a harem about God knows what sounds intriguing (said no one, ever.)
Don't waste your time- I did it for you! The acting is atrocious.. the plot non existent
Le saviez-vous
- AnecdotesFirst film featuring Lindsay Lohan in 6 years, since The Canyons (2013), although the film was shot in 2015.
- GaffesToutes les informations contiennent des spoilers
- Bandes originales7 Years Ago
Performed by MANO
Meilleurs choix
Connectez-vous pour évaluer et suivre la liste de favoris afin de recevoir des recommandations personnalisées
- How long is Among the Shadows?Alimenté par Alexa
Détails
Box-office
- Budget
- 3 000 000 $US (estimé)
- Durée1 heure 36 minutes
- Couleur
- Rapport de forme
- 1.78 : 1
Contribuer à cette page
Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant