Dix ans avant Kirk, Spock et l'Enterprise, l'USS Discovery découvre de nouveaux mondes et de nouvelles formes de vie alors qu'un officier de Starfleet apprend à comprendre toute chose étrang... Tout lireDix ans avant Kirk, Spock et l'Enterprise, l'USS Discovery découvre de nouveaux mondes et de nouvelles formes de vie alors qu'un officier de Starfleet apprend à comprendre toute chose étrangère.Dix ans avant Kirk, Spock et l'Enterprise, l'USS Discovery découvre de nouveaux mondes et de nouvelles formes de vie alors qu'un officier de Starfleet apprend à comprendre toute chose étrangère.
- Récompensé par 2 Primetime Emmys
- 23 victoires et 92 nominations au total
Parcourir les épisodes
Résumé
Reviewers say 'Star Trek: Discovery' receives mixed reactions for its fresh take, impressive effects, and diverse cast. Fans appreciate modern themes and character development. Criticisms include Klingon redesigns, deviations from traditional values, and reliance on action over philosophical depth. Some find character arcs and storytelling lacking, while others praise progressive social justice themes. The series polarizes audiences with its approach to core Star Trek elements and new directions.
Avis à la une
I'm sort of enjoying this in parts, but why oh why is the main character, Michael Burnham, bursting into tears or looking tearful in nearly every one of her scenes? Who on earth would write a Commander who is supposed to have had a Vulcan upbringing but is both emotionally unstable and incapable of making the kind of flash, life and death decisions required of command? The whole of everything can be at stake and yet she stands around crying about one thing ot another, agonising with someone while people around her are suffering and dying and the world is coming to an end yet again and you are thinking for God's sake get on with it and stop blubbering. The amount of emotion had me in tears, not of empathy but boredom. The amount of slow moving, soul-searching scenes is a drag on what could otherwise be a good show. The gratuitous violence is too much and unnecessary. I have commented previously in another place about the current annoyingly cynical use of gay or lesbian relationships in every series and film these days. The right to a relationship of your choice and way of life is an accepted thing now, so why is there a pushy political agenda which I think is patronising to gay people in that the producers assume that gay people won't watch anything without a gay person in it? Sci-fi fans are sci-fi fans no matter who they are, and it is partitioning gay people rather than treating them as normal viewers like the rest od us. I also found some action very confusing. The special effects are great, though. We're into Series 3 so I don't expect the crying to lessen. I tend to go and make tea now in the blubbery moments, but one can only drink so much tea in an hour or so.
I just finished watching season 4 episode 1 and I don't know what to make of it. The show's script and dialogues feels like it's for an audience of 12 years old. The special effects are nicely done but the technology is borderline "magic" not believable.
Watching season 4 up to episode 4 at the moment i can't shake the feeling overly sensitive person or people are responsible for directing and producing this soap opera-like show. There is so much drama that it feels there is only drama. No dark and light areas, no contrast just heavy drama situations, overly acted, overly wise conversations. I don't want to point fingers at the actors but some of them make my stomach turn how absolutely terrible they are at conveying emotion on screen.
I love star trek but this is the most boring series I've ever seen.
I love star trek but this is the most boring series I've ever seen.
Where to begin...
For starters, it claims to be in line with the original series and its timeline yet nothing on display lines up with it or even visually resembles it. Instead it tries to replicate the look, feel, and energy of the JJ Abrams/Kelvin timeline movies(lens flares aplenty!) but it even fails at that.
The characters are mostly bland, stereotypical, and unlikeable.
It feels like everything that the original series tried to say has been thrown out the window to appeal to one-sided politics, Gene Roddenberry was trying to present hope and optimism for the future but here as far as Discovery is concerned the future is to be pretty but cold and uncaring.
As for the acting it ranges from good to okay mostly, very talented performers such as Jason Isaacs, Michelle Yeoh, Anson Mount, and Doug Jones all try their hardest but only in tiny glimpses are able to make the rough material work.
I would have to agree with other commenters that you are just better off with The Orville instead, far better Star Trek series.
For starters, it claims to be in line with the original series and its timeline yet nothing on display lines up with it or even visually resembles it. Instead it tries to replicate the look, feel, and energy of the JJ Abrams/Kelvin timeline movies(lens flares aplenty!) but it even fails at that.
The characters are mostly bland, stereotypical, and unlikeable.
It feels like everything that the original series tried to say has been thrown out the window to appeal to one-sided politics, Gene Roddenberry was trying to present hope and optimism for the future but here as far as Discovery is concerned the future is to be pretty but cold and uncaring.
As for the acting it ranges from good to okay mostly, very talented performers such as Jason Isaacs, Michelle Yeoh, Anson Mount, and Doug Jones all try their hardest but only in tiny glimpses are able to make the rough material work.
I would have to agree with other commenters that you are just better off with The Orville instead, far better Star Trek series.
The show started out techno-clever with interesting character interactions.
Now all we have is a bunch of needy characters episode after episode. Even the computer is needy. It is exhausting.
I give it a 6 because I still have hope, but the writing is being sucked into a black hole of neediness.
Now all we have is a bunch of needy characters episode after episode. Even the computer is needy. It is exhausting.
I give it a 6 because I still have hope, but the writing is being sucked into a black hole of neediness.
Stellar Photos From the "Star Trek" TV Universe
Stellar Photos From the "Star Trek" TV Universe
We've rounded up some of our favorite photos from across the "Star Trek" TV universe. Take a look at memorable moments from red carpet premieres and classic episodes.
Le saviez-vous
- AnecdotesThe Starfleet vessels seen in the first season, including the Discovery, the Shenzou and the redesigned Enterprise, were all designed by production artist John Eaves. Eaves' work with Star Trek spans three decades. Probably his most notable contribution was the design of the Enterprise-E for Star Trek : Premier Contact (1996).
- GaffesWith Michael being the adoptive sister of Spock, the series has many flashbacks to their childhood and upbringing on Vulcan. Spock's Vulcan half-brother, Sybok, does not appear nor is mention during these scenes. In Star Trek V : L'Ultime Frontière (1989), Spock says that he and Sybok grew up together. However, since it's never stated when Sybok joined Sarek's home - only that he did so following his mother's death - or when he was exiled from the family, it's not impossible Sybok moved in after Burnham, and left before she graduated (the two extremes of the flashbacks). Also, since Sybok was never mentioned before Star Trek V, it seems reasonable the family never spoke of him again after his estrangement.
- Versions alternativesThe serif-font legends and subtitles in the "broadcast" episodes are absent from the DVD versions, where they are replaced with the standard DVD subtitles.
- ConnexionsFeatured in MsMojo: Top 10 Female Lead TV Shows You Should Be Watching in 2017 (2017)
Meilleurs choix
Connectez-vous pour évaluer et suivre la liste de favoris afin de recevoir des recommandations personnalisées
- How many seasons does Star Trek: Discovery have?Alimenté par Alexa
- Why do the Klingons in this series look completely different to how they look in all of the previous Star Trek shows and films?
- Do I need to have seen any previous Star Trek TV series and movies in order to be able to understand and follow this show?
- Does this series take place in the alternate timeline of Star Trek (2009), or the timeline we are all used to from TOS?
Détails
- Date de sortie
- Pays d’origine
- Sites officiels
- Langues
- Aussi connu sous le nom de
- Star Trek: Hành Trình Khám Phá
- Lieux de tournage
- Sociétés de production
- Voir plus de crédits d'entreprise sur IMDbPro
- Durée1 heure
- Couleur
- Mixage
Contribuer à cette page
Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant